WSJ exposes Tesla’s faulty autopilot that has resulted in deaths
- Thread starter stinkynuts
- Start date
You believe a product put out by a con, this is what happens.
Revolutionizing and innovating new ways to die, eh?. @Skoob
Revolutionizing and innovating new ways to die, eh?. @Skoob
You think Tesla/Musk invented autonomous cars?
You do know when you try and peddle misinformation to support your confused narrative it just makes you look stupid right?
That's irrelevant.
You are implying that Tesla is a failure and that Musk is as well based on your comment.
You are slippery indeed.
Why is it irrelevant?
This thread is about Tesla deaths.
And I am implying, as I openly stated in my first post, that Musk is a con, who lies and doesn't deliver on his promises.
How will you counter this fact backed up by evidence?
Would you go into the backseat of a self driving car?
As a dude that worked in computer (developer, database specialist, project manager) I would never!!
Each time you read code written by another developer or a whole team in a program you always end up seeing comments in the code like:
- Below is the code to patch an urgent bug that was released early in V1. If this comment is still here in future version something's wrong
- Do not touch the code below unless you really know your shit. Hint... Nobody does...
- If the function below is used it means our code did not catch the error the monkey (the user) did. Better reset him to square one.
- When I wrote this only me and god knew what I was doing. Now only god knows.
- I dedicated all the code I wrote below to my wife, kids and dog, who will have to support me once this software is released.
- The code below was a temporary hack put in place just before release in January 2002.
- The code below was written by the late great David Bartner, may he rest in peace. And yes the incremental loop below actually starts at 100 and decrement to 0. David should have been a plumber or an horticulturist but never write a line of code...
- The function below always return TRUE. Go figure...
And you want me to trust developer with my life? Developers are in a hurry to get home and play games dude!
.
As a dude that worked in computer (developer, database specialist, project manager) I would never!!
Each time you read code written by another developer or a whole team in a program you always end up seeing comments in the code like:
- Below is the code to patch an urgent bug that was released early in V1. If this comment is still here in future version something's wrong
- Do not touch the code below unless you really know your shit. Hint... Nobody does...
- If the function below is used it means our code did not catch the error the monkey (the user) did. Better reset him to square one.
- When I wrote this only me and god knew what I was doing. Now only god knows.
- I dedicated all the code I wrote below to my wife, kids and dog, who will have to support me once this software is released.
- The code below was a temporary hack put in place just before release in January 2002.
- The code below was written by the late great David Bartner, may he rest in peace. And yes the incremental loop below actually starts at 100 and decrement to 0. David should have been a plumber or an horticulturist but never write a line of code...
- The function below always return TRUE. Go figure...
And you want me to trust developer with my life? Developers are in a hurry to get home and play games dude!
.
So by your measure all car manufacturers are cons because people have died driving their vehicles?
You keep tripping over your own argument.
No.
All car manufacturers are not touting FSD by a certain date and failing to deliver on them.
Only Musk is.
So only he is a con.
Careful. You are going to throw your back out doing your double twisting double backflip so many times instead of just admitting failure.
