I don't think he is on the committee, so it would have to be on the floor.
I think it would depend a lot on how you define "integrity".
Vetting materials might result in bad things being uncovered.
www.govexec.com
www.lemonde.fr
If the materials are required for vetting and not being turned over then it would seem the GOP are the ones delaying things and playing games.
If only the Dems were as critical of proper vetting at the border....
When trump nominates an incompetent person that is a risk to such a critical position in the Government as it could compromise the security of all Americans then The Democrats are correct to get to the bottom of her meetings with Assad and her relationships with the likes of the Russians!!
She already has security clearance and submitted most of the paperwork.
I guess it turns out that nominees for senior cabinet positions have to submit ALL of the paperwork…not just most of it. That wouldn’t cut it if she was applying for her passport or drivers license…how can she be trusted to run a major government agency when she can’t even fill in the correct forms?
If she already has security clearance then she has nothing to hide. To obtain that clearance would require significant vetting just for that.
Probably nothing.
When Convicted Felon Trump's own former members of staff like Bolton are condemning her past record for the manner in which visited Syria to have multiple meetings with Assad and then praising him for his rule, especially when he gassed his own people on numerous occasions. She was also notorious for parroting The Russian "Biolabs" Conspiracy theory in order to sway the opinion against Ukraine in their war with Russia!!
Nope...paperwork.
The paperwork is important. She is applying for a senior cabinet position that directly affects national security. If it was a Dem nominee you would not be this dismissive of the vetting process.
Yes…Dems have been complaining about this for weeks while Tulsi and the GOP have refused to complete the required documents.
Same place it is now.
From my read, it isn't her holding up the paperwork, but government depts with in charge of the checks.
Gabbard became a controversial person and caused alarms in both Republican and Democratic Party over the manner in which she visited Syria and meeting Assad on three separate occasions. She did not inform the House about these meetings and even her own staff were not fully aware of her scheduled meetings. But during the 2020 nomination process is where she fell out with the Democrats and with Hillary Clinton in particular. They both attacked one another. But remember that this position as Director of National Intelligence is a cause for concern due to her support once again for the Russian backed Conspiracy Theories that I already posted. We know that the Republicans also have their concerns about this pick, but just do not have the balls to speak out against it. No doubt McConnell and maybe two other Republicans will vote against her nomination!!
www.forbes.com
I dunno…I suspect she will get through in the end.
Russian backed conspiracy theories, lol...My word, lol
All depends on Collins and Murkowski voting with the Democrats. But you are right as Lindsey Graham will not break ranks with Trump. He will rather crap his pants than get on Trump'sbad books. But it could be another tie breaker for Vance to decide!!Tulsi Gabbard Confirmation: Senate Approves Gabbard As Trump’s Spy Chief—McConnell Lone GOP ‘No’ Vote
After Gabbard faced a public questioning, she passed votes in the Senate Intelligence Committee and Senate.
From the article above:
I dunno…I suspect she will get through in the end.
You forgot about the "25+ US Funded Biolabs" in Ukraine Conspiracy Theory, that she was supposed to have "revealed".............Really??
Well Gabbard made some gaffes while in Syria such as:
www.theguardian.com
She already has security clearance.
