It's about intent. Their intent is to delay and to sabotage progress.What’s wrong with requesting the required vetting materials?
You know that right?
It's about intent. Their intent is to delay and to sabotage progress.What’s wrong with requesting the required vetting materials?
I don't think he is on the committee, so it would have to be on the floor.She might actually get Sanders.
I think it would depend a lot on how you define "integrity".I think Bernie has more integrity than you give him credit for…but we’ll see.
Vetting materials might result in bad things being uncovered.What’s wrong with requesting the required vetting materials?
If the materials are required for vetting and not being turned over then it would seem the GOP are the ones delaying things and playing games.It's about intent. Their intent is to delay and to sabotage progress.
You know that right?
If only the Dems were as critical of proper vetting at the border....If the materials are required for vetting and not being turned over then it would seem the GOP are the ones delaying things and playing games.
When trump nominates an incompetent person that is a risk to such a critical position in the Government as it could compromise the security of all Americans then The Democrats are correct to get to the bottom of her meetings with Assad and her relationships with the likes of the Russians!!More Democrat sabotage attempts (from your same source/article)...yawn...it's all they really have at this point.
Senate Democrats are forcing a delay in Tulsi Gabbard's confirmation hearing next week, claiming she hasn't provided required vetting materials — while Republicans accuse them of playing games, Axios has learned.
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/07/tulsi-gabbard-senate-democrats-delay-hearing
She already has security clearance and submitted most of the paperwork.When trump nominates an incompetent person that is a risk to such a critical position in the Government as it could compromise the security of all Americans then The Democrats are correct to get to the bottom of her meetings with Assad and her relationships with the likes of the Russians!!
Republicans have also done the same to less controversial appointments during The Obama and Biden eras. When the shoe is on the other foot as usual it is a "Yawn" to the right lies!!
I guess it turns out that nominees for senior cabinet positions have to submit ALL of the paperwork…not just most of it. That wouldn’t cut it if she was applying for her passport or drivers license…how can she be trusted to run a major government agency when she can’t even fill in the correct forms?She already has security clearance and submitted most of the paperwork.
Do you think the remaining form she needs to submit has anything to do with judging her for anything? Do you think the remaining form is the dealbreaker for whether she's qualified for that role?
They are desperately trying to sabotage and delay. It's the only thing they have left.
You would have to be an idiot not to see that.
If she already has security clearance then she has nothing to hide. To obtain that clearance would require significant vetting just for that.I guess it turns out that nominees for senior cabinet positions have to submit ALL of the paperwork…not just most of it. That wouldn’t cut it if she was applying for her passport or drivers license…how can she be trusted to run a major government agency when she can’t even fill in the correct forms?
Plus…What is she trying to hide on the forms she has not submitted? I’m not saying she is actually hiding anything…I’m just asking questions.
Probably nothing.I guess it turns out that nominees for senior cabinet positions have to submit ALL of the paperwork…not just most of it. That wouldn’t cut it if she was applying for her passport or drivers license…how can she be trusted to run a major government agency when she can’t even fill in the correct forms?
Plus…What is she trying to hide on the forms she has not submitted? I’m not saying she is actually hiding anything…I’m just asking questions.
When Convicted Felon Trump's own former members of staff like Bolton are condemning her past record for the manner in which visited Syria to have multiple meetings with Assad and then praising him for his rule, especially when he gassed his own people on numerous occasions. She was also notorious for parroting The Russian "Biolabs" Conspiracy theory in order to sway the opinion against Ukraine in their war with Russia!!She already has security clearance and submitted most of the paperwork.
Do you think the remaining form she needs to submit has anything to do with judging her for anything? Do you think the remaining form is the dealbreaker for whether she's qualified for that role?
They are desperately trying to sabotage and delay. It's the only thing they have left.
You would have to be an idiot not to see that.
When Convicted Felon Trump's own former members of staff like Bolton are condemning her past record for the manner in which visited Syria to have multiple meetings with Assad and then praising him for his rule, especially when he gassed his own people on numerous occasions. She was also notorious for parroting The Russian "Biolabs" Conspiracy theory in order to sway the opinion against Ukraine in their war with Russia!!
Stop your illiterate name calling scoob!!
Nope...paperwork.When Convicted Felon Trump's own former members of staff like Bolton are condemning her past record for the manner in which visited Syria to have multiple meetings with Assad and then praising him for his rule, especially when he gassed his own people on numerous occasions. She was also notorious for parroting The Russian "Biolabs" Conspiracy theory in order to sway the opinion against Ukraine in their war with Russia!!
Stop your illiterate name calling scoob!!
The paperwork is important. She is applying for a senior cabinet position that directly affects national security. If it was a Dem nominee you would not be this dismissive of the vetting process.Nope...paperwork.
Just another case of a former Democrat being attacked and bullied by the same party that used to cherish her.
Yes…Dems have been complaining about this for weeks while Tulsi and the GOP have refused to complete the required documents.The Jan. 30 hearing comes after Democrats resisted the scheduling of an earlier hearing, saying they still didn’t have the full slate of background checks, ethics disclosures and paperwork on a candidate whose overall qualifications have sparked their concern.
https://www.kxan.com/hill-politics/senate-panel-sets-hearing-on-tulsi-gabbard-nomination/
Sen. John Barrasso said Sunday that the confirmation hearing for Tulsi Gabbard, President-elect Donald Trump's pick for director of national intelligence, is being held up by "a paperwork problem" with the Office of Government Ethics.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/john-b...nate-whip-tulsi-gabbard-confirmation-hearing/
Same place it is now.btw Tulsi Gabbard met with Assad in 2017 when she was a member of the Democrat party. Where was your outrage then?
From my read, it isn't her holding up the paperwork, but government depts with in charge of the checks.The paperwork is important. She is applying for a senior cabinet position that directly affects national security. If it was a Dem nominee you would not be this dismissive of the vetting process.
Yes…Dems have been complaining about this for weeks while Tulsi and the GOP have refused to complete the required documents.
You know what would solve this problem? Filling in the required forms.
Tulsi is either incompetent or she is trying to hide something. I wouldn’t be able to cross the border to watch a Sabres game if I didn’t have my documents in order but you guys all wanna give Tulsi a free pass? smh
Same place it is now.
Gabbard became a controversial person and caused alarms in both Republican and Democratic Party over the manner in which she visited Syria and meeting Assad on three separate occasions. She did not inform the House about these meetings and even her own staff were not fully aware of her scheduled meetings. But during the 2020 nomination process is where she fell out with the Democrats and with Hillary Clinton in particular. They both attacked one another. But remember that this position as Director of National Intelligence is a cause for concern due to her support once again for the Russian backed Conspiracy Theories that I already posted. We know that the Republicans also have their concerns about this pick, but just do not have the balls to speak out against it. No doubt McConnell and maybe two other Republicans will vote against her nomination!!Nope...paperwork.
Just another case of a former Democrat being attacked and bullied by the same party that used to cherish her.
The Jan. 30 hearing comes after Democrats resisted the scheduling of an earlier hearing, saying they still didn’t have the full slate of background checks, ethics disclosures and paperwork on a candidate whose overall qualifications have sparked their concern.
https://www.kxan.com/hill-politics/senate-panel-sets-hearing-on-tulsi-gabbard-nomination/
Sen. John Barrasso said Sunday that the confirmation hearing for Tulsi Gabbard, President-elect Donald Trump's pick for director of national intelligence, is being held up by "a paperwork problem" with the Office of Government Ethics.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/john-b...nate-whip-tulsi-gabbard-confirmation-hearing/
btw Tulsi Gabbard met with Assad in 2017 when she was a member of the Democrat party. Where was your outrage then?
Gabbard became a controversial person and caused alarms in both Republican and Democratic Party over the manner in which she visited Syria and meeting Assad on three separate occasions. She did not inform the House about these meetings and even her own staff were not fully aware of her scheduled meetings. But during the 2020 nomination process is where she fell out with the Democrats and with Hillary Clinton in particular. They both attacked one another. But remember that this position as Director of National Intelligence is a cause for concern due to her support once again for the Russian backed Conspiracy Theories that I already posted. We know that the Republicans also have their concerns about this pick, but just do not have the balls to speak out against it. No doubt McConnell and maybe two other Republicans will vote against her nomination!!
I dunno…I suspect she will get through in the end.What Do Republicans Say About Gabbard?
So far, no Republican senators have said they’ll vote against Gabbard, but several, in addition to Graham, have expressed reservations, including Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine, John Cornyn, R-Texas, and Mike Rounds, R-S.D. Collins specifically citing her views on Russia as a deterrent. Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., also initially questioned whether Gabbard would support Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which allows the U.S. government to conduct surveillance of non-citizens abroad without a warrant. Gabbard voted against legislation authorizing the act during her time in Congress, but reversed course after she was nominated for director of national intelligence, issuing a statement earlier this month stating her support for the surveillance program. Lankford said publicly he would support her after she endorsed Section 702.
Russian backed conspiracy theories, lol...My word, lolGabbard became a controversial person and caused alarms in both Republican and Democratic Party over the manner in which she visited Syria and meeting Assad on three separate occasions. She did not inform the House about these meetings and even her own staff were not fully aware of her scheduled meetings. But during the 2020 nomination process is where she fell out with the Democrats and with Hillary Clinton in particular. They both attacked one another. But remember that this position as Director of National Intelligence is a cause for concern due to her support once again for the Russian backed Conspiracy Theories that I already posted. We know that the Republicans also have their concerns about this pick, but just do not have the balls to speak out against it. No doubt McConnell and maybe two other Republicans will vote against her nomination!!
All depends on Collins and Murkowski voting with the Democrats. But you are right as Lindsey Graham will not break ranks with Trump. He will rather crap his pants than get on Trump'sbad books. But it could be another tie breaker for Vance to decide!!![]()
Tulsi Gabbard Confirmation: Senate Approves Gabbard As Trump’s Spy Chief—McConnell Lone GOP ‘No’ Vote
After Gabbard faced a public questioning, she passed votes in the Senate Intelligence Committee and Senate.www.forbes.com
From the article above:
I dunno…I suspect she will get through in the end.
You forgot about the "25+ US Funded Biolabs" in Ukraine Conspiracy Theory, that she was supposed to have "revealed".............Really??Russian backed conspiracy theories, lol...My word, lol
And she fell out of favour with the Dems when she exposed Kamala Harris during the DNC debate. You seemed to skip over that one...Just like your news sources have a habit of.
Well Gabbard made some gaffes while in Syria such as:But Gabbard has repeatedly shared conspiracy theories, including claiming shortly after Russia invaded Ukraine that there are “25+ US-funded biolabs in Ukraine which if breached would release & spread deadly pathogens to US/world”. In fact, the US program stemming back to the 1990s is directed at better securing labs that focus on infectious disease outbreaks.
During a congressional trip in 2015, Moustafa recalled, Gabbard had asked three young Syrian girls whether the airstrike they had narrowly survived may not have been launched by Assad, but rather by the terrorist group Isis. The one problem? Isis did not have an air force.