Pickering Angels

US supreme court rules Trump has ‘absolute immunity’ for official acts

The Oracle

Pronouns: Who/Cares
Mar 8, 2004
24,962
49,852
113
On the slopes of Mount Parnassus, Greece
The lefties are calling for Trump to be poisoned or nuked. LOL. I thought they were worried about Trump doing that to his political opponent? Yet they are calling for it to be done to him. The TDS is strong in these guys. I think the left all needs to take a pill or seek mental help.
The sad part is most of them are on medication and still behave this way...
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
74,638
81,239
113
It could affect the hush money case. The payments were made after he was President. It could also affect the documents case, He was still President when he took them to Florida
But the hush money in particular isn't connected to any presidential duties.

It's like me paying off a blackmail threat by an escort after being made president.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shakenbake

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
10,081
1,931
113
Maybe Biden should exercise his newly declared immunity by sending a hit squad to take out the treasonous felon Trump, thereby saving democracy, and then fire 6 of the judges and have that immunity removed.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,112
1,901
113
Ghawar
Maybe Biden should exercise his newly declared immunity by sending a hit squad to take out the treasonous felon Trump, thereby saving democracy, and then fire 6 of the judges and have that immunity removed.
To follow up this feat Biden would have to make himself the
dictator, appoint his successor and scuttle the 2024 election
to preemptively take out Trump II.
 

Gooseifur

Well-known member
Aug 13, 2019
3,828
440
83
But the hush money in particular isn't connected to any presidential duties.

It's like me paying off a blackmail threat by an escort after being made president.
No but some of the communications were with white house staff such as Hope Hicks who testified, and communications sent through white house emails were used as evidence. I;m not saying it's valid but with the scope of immunity set by scotus who knows
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
88,810
21,063
113
To follow up this feat Biden would have to make himself the
dictator, appoint his successor and scuttle the 2024 election
to preemptively take out Trump II.
Nah, he could do the dirty work and then install a set of judges that would return the US to democracy and the law and then not run in 2024.
Save the country, take the fall for the GOP attack dogs and put the country back on track.

But would he?
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
19,836
14,202
113
The decision won't affect the hush money case, as this was when Trump was a private citizen BEFORE he became president. It probably won't affect the stolen documents case, as Trump was a private citizen AFTER he was president.
It already has albeit delayed only at this point but it can get worse or better if you're in Trump's camp.

 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
31,866
58,251
113
All decision-makers have immunity, as long as they stay within the proper ambit of their powers. Judges have judicial immunity. Legislators have legislative immunity.
Wasn't really in dispute in the case.
I remain baffled you think this is a good decision.

The decision won't affect the hush money case, as this was when Trump was a private citizen BEFORE he became president.
It has already affected the case, although Merchand may refuse the motion.

It probably won't affect the stolen documents case, as Trump was a private citizen AFTER he was president.
He took the documents before leaving the presidency.
Therefore it will affect the case.

The insurrection case is interesting, as it involves corrupt and bad faith conduct when Trump was still in office.
Which you aren't allowed to mention or infer.
All official acts are immune and motive can't be used to question that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
31,866
58,251
113
The question is whether the USSC ruling allows bad faith to be taken into account or confers absolute immunity.

Also a question of whether challenging the selection of his successor is within his role as president, as it doesn't involve enforcement and execution of Congress's decrees or his diplomatic duties?

If this is Trump qua private citizen / candidate, then immunity should not attach. And indeed, the president has no role in the selection of the incoming president. It's the Senate and the V-P who play the key roles.
You didn't read the case or summaries of it, did you?

Bad faith doesn't matter.
The court will decide if something is an official act.
In other words, challenging the selection (if it is Donald Trump) is immune.

There is no list of official acts, it is "what does this judge decide is an official act for this person".
(If you want the fig leaf, it is that the President's job is to ensure the elections ran properly.)


It's a power grab by the judiciary.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: mandrill

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
88,810
21,063
113
You didn't read the case or summaries of it, did you?

Bad faith doesn't matter.
The court will decide if something is an official act.
In other words, challenging the selection (if it is Donald Trump) is immune.

There is no list of official acts, it is "what does this judge decide is an official act for this person".
(If you want the fig leaf, it is that the President's job is to ensure the elections ran properly.)


It's a power grab by the judiciary.
Hopefully this is true, though unlikely and slow.
 

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
10,081
1,931
113
Is asking for 12000 votes to be fabricated in Georgia, an official act? If so, the SCOTUS is totally corrupt.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
31,866
58,251
113
Is asking for 12000 votes to be fabricated in Georgia, an official act? If so, the SCOTUS is totally corrupt.
SCOTUS didn't say.
They said that they get to decide later however they feel like.

So yes, if Trump did it, it is and he is immune as long as it is the current SCOTUS deciding.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: wigglee
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts