Recap of where we are:
It was pointed out that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights extends a right of entry to a country ONLY to people from that country. It uses the phrase "to his country" in describing who gets this right, in the text: "Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country. "
You haven't provided a single, solitary reason to think that someone born in Syria would have any way to claim that Israel was "his country", and in fact all the evidence we've seen would indicate that it is not his country--Syria, the country of his birth, is his country and not Israel, a country he has never even set foot in. The UDHR text has NOTHING to do with ethnic cleansing or even refugees, which you have brought up to make the argument emotional and try and obfuscate the issue. The text in the UDHR though, is straightforward and simple -- you have a right to return to your own country, and as such, you have to have some acceptable evidence that it's your country in order to claim that right.
Since failing utterly and completely to provide even a shred of evidence for your claim that this should apply to foreigners born outside a country just because of who their ancestors are, with no reason whatsoever given to justify your crazy belief, you have been yammering on trying to claim that you are right unless proved wrong.
You're just stupid. I note that you have totally failed to produce a UN resolution stating that you are stupid, and until you provide evidence of a treaty stating that you are not stupid, it has been proved that you are a complete fucking idiotic moro. Hey this is your line of argument, "my claim is true unless you prove it isn't" -- BULL SHIT.