She's not a man.
Declaring her a man puts her in danger in Algeria, where there is serious anti trans hate.
Two Biological Males Allowed to Fight in Female Div. At Paris Olympics
- Thread starter TomFord1980
- Start date
Declaring her a man puts her in danger in Algeria, where there is serious anti trans hate.
It is so strange the IOC choose boxing to fuck around with. But then it finally hit me why. With boxing (and all other combat sports) there are no world records.... With sports that keep track of world records such as track events and swimming, the IOC won't be able to hide this. However the IOC decision to allow this to happen with combat sports is very flawed because with combat sports there is a higher risk for brain damage, physical injuries, or death.
I am making research as we speak. It seems that she was born a female. Assigned female sex at birth. She is also not trans nor never claim to be. She was cleared to participate at the last Olympics but didn't won anything.
Case closed
I won't question her heart or decision. I only question her decision to step into the ring, she should have refused to.
Loading…
www.cbc.ca
Last edited:
I am going to assume her blood testosterone levels are male. And technically she is probably both male and female (e.g. Caster Semenya) If that is the case, why did she choose to fight in the female division as oppose to the male division??
But she’s not a man. Do you really think a trained boxer who’s a woman could beat another trained boxer who’s a man? I guarantee you that a trained boxer who’s a male would NEVER lose to a trained boxer who’s a woman. Whether it be by points or knock out. Add in the fact that they’re the same weight classes too and that will never happen. You clearly know nothing about combat sports and in that case you need to sit down and shut up.
Because if she fought against men she’d get knocked the fuck out lol. But the fact is she’s not a man she’s a woman and that’s why she’s competing in the women’s division
Well what is she then?? Does this Algerian boxer have a penis?? He/she is obviously stronger than a normal woman. IMHO, this isn't like the Lia Thomas swimming fiasco. A biological woman fighting against this Algerian boxer, could get herself killed or get a serious concussion, as gollumtroll, said upthread!!
Well, she shouldn't be competing in the woman's division either!! As usual, just my opinion!!
Boxer previously barred from women’s events wins fight after opponent quits in 46 seconds
Trump, Elon Musk, J.K. Rowling, and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni all appeared to criticize the inclusion of boxer Imane Khelif of Algeria.
Don't repeat the fake news that the Algerian Olympic boxer, Imane Khelif, is 'trans', in the usual Western sense. Yes, they seem to be genetically male (XY chromosomes), but they seem to have a fairly rare disorder of sexual development that makes their phenotypic traits partly feminized. Not their choice, but just how they developed. Here's an excellent post by
@hoovlet
explaining the difference. (Fwiw, I don't think they should be competing against biological females. And the media coverage is mostly evading & dissembling about the whole situation. )
ps lots of replies here seem to think I'm advocating for people with XY disorders of sexual development to be competing in women's sports against women. Nope. I do NOT advocate for that. Read the end of my post, where I explicitly said 'I don't think they should be competing against biological females'.
Seems like a good time to re-post my older (now edited) post about athletes with XY DSDs (Disorder, or Difference of Sex Development). Lots of graphs and detail about the relevant biology at the end. * * * First: People living with DSDs should be treated with compassion and understanding, and receive any heath care they need. These can be challenging conditions for individuals and their families. But when male athletes have DSDs that give them an advantage over females, and they compete in the female category, this raises concerns about safety and fairness, and forces discussion of the relevant physical traits. Athletes with XY DSDs who have testes (usually internal), XY sex chromosomes, male-typical levels of testosterone, and functional androgen receptors are often described as females with "hyperandrogenism," i.e., abnormally high levels of testosterone. They experience physical benefits of this high testosterone during puberty, which translate into athletic advantages over females. The issue for sports is that athletes with the XY DSD 5-alpha reductase deficiency (5-ARD), may be socialized as female, may be legally female, and may live and identify as female; but they are male. These individuals are usually born with female-appearing genitalia, which can lead to being sexed as female. Here's why. 5-ARD is caused by a mutation in the gene that codes for the enzyme 5-alpha reductase, which converts testosterone into a more potent androgen, DHT. This androgen interacts with the androgen receptor, like testosterone, and is necessary for the typical development of male external genitalia (penis and scrotum) and the prostate. Without DHT, female-typical external genitalia develop. At the end of this monster post is a graphic of the relevant steroid production pathway, from my book T: The story of Testosterone. DHT is also responsible for male-pattern baldness and dark, coarse facial hair, which is why people with the condition have smooth skin that can give a feminine appearance. The “decision makers” are aware that athletes with 5-ARD are male, and that they experience the benefits of male puberty. The requirement to reduce their testosterone to typical female levels isn’t discriminatory, since these are males who are asking to compete in the female category. But more significantly, all the relevant scientific evidence shows that reducing male T in adulthood does not undo the physical benefits of male puberty. Here's more detail about T, DHT, and male advantage in strength and speed. I've been asked if men with the DSD 5-ARD (in which ppl cannot convert testosterone into the more potent androgen DHT) experience the typical benefits of male puberty, that would give them an advantage in strength and speed relative to women. This is relevant to questions about whether male athletes with 5-ARD should be allowed to compete in the female category. This is an excellent question, because it could be the case that DHT is necessary for the development and maintenance of male-typical muscle, lean body mass and strength. If that were the case, then people with 5-ARD might not have a typical male advantage, because the lack of DHT would perhaps lead to a more feminine pattern of fat, lean body mass and strength. I've wondered about this myself and have looked into the evidence. Perhaps the top researcher in this area, Shalendar Bhasin, who is scrupulous in his methods, has examined this very question. The answer appears to be: no, testosterone does not need to be converted to DHT to exert its typical anabolic effects. These findings are reported in his 2012 study, "Effect of Testosterone Supplementation With and Without a Dual 5α-Reductase Inhibitor on Fat-Free Mass in Men With Suppressed Testosterone Production, A Randomized Controlled Trial." (It is linked to below—and since it's paywalled, I've included the graphs that show comparisons between the placebo and DHT— inhibited conditions, with no difference on the various outcomes.) For more detail, the investigators wanted to examine the effects of suppressing DHT on muscle mass, strength, and sexual function. This important because one of the treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia and male-pattern baldness is to suppress DHT, but clinicians have been concerned about effects on other outcomes that affect health and quality of life. Participants (healthy men, 18 to 50, with normal T levels) had their T blocked, and were given graded doses of T, along with either placebo or a drug that blocked the conversion of T to DHT. So both groups had T, but only one, the placebo group, also had DHT. After 20 weeks of treatment, changes in lean body mass, muscle, and strength were assessed. There were no significant difference between the placebo and DHT-blocked groups in these outcomes. For LOTS more detail, here's the relevant text from the results. Please don't ask me questions about the study. Just look at the abstract and results which you can find by Googling. The main point is that while there are predicted effects of the different doses of T received, there were no differences in the outcomes according to whether they had DHT blocked (with dutasteride) or not (placebo). "Fat-Free Mass Fat-free mass and lean body mass increased in a dose-dependent manner in the placebo and dutasteride [THIS IS THE DRUG THAT BLOCKS CONVERSION OF T TO DHT] groups (Figure 2). The changes in fat-free mass were related to testosterone dose and changes in testosterone concentrations in the placebo and dutasteride groups but did not differ between groups; the dose-adjusted mean difference (placebo minus dutasteride) in fat-free mass was 0.50 kg (95% CI, −0.22 to 1.22 kg; P = .18). There was no significant interaction between testosterone dose and randomization to dutasteride or placebo, indicating a lack of evidence that the relationship of testosterone dose to change in fat-free mass differed between the dutasteride and placebo groups. The model-based smoothed regression lines, obtained by generalized additive models, describing the relationship between changes in testosterone concentrations and changes in fat-free mass and lean body mass were similar in the placebo and dutasteride groups. Changes in fat mass were negatively related to testosterone dose and concentrations, but the relationship between change in fat mass and dose did not differ significantly between the placebo and dutasteride groups (P = .41; Figure 2)." "Muscle strength Leg-press and chest-press strength increased dependently by dose in the placebo and dutasteride groups. Increases in leg-press and chest-press strength were greater with larger doses and higher concentrations of testosterone. These relationships did not differ between the placebo and dutasteride groups (Figure 2)." Really interesting commentary from the authors on the role of DHT in adult men: "Why then did the steroid 5α-reductase system evolve for androgens? Forty-six XY males with steroid 5α-reductase deficiency exhibited ambiguous or female external genitalia at birth and poor prostate development, but underwent normal muscle and bone development during pubertal transition. The phenotype of these patients suggests that steroid 5α-reductase plays an essential role in the development of prostate and phallus by providing local amplification of an androgenic signal without systemic hyperandrogenemia during critical periods of sexual differentiation, illustrating nature's extraordinary ingenuity in creating mechanisms for tissue-selective amplification during development. We speculate that in adult men, in whom this tissue-specific amplification is not essential because the circulating testosterone concentrations are substantially higher than those in the fetus, testosterone and DHT can interchangeably subserve many androgenic functions. When circulating testosterone concentrations are low, intraprostatic DHT formation may become important in maintaining prostate growth, thus buffering the effects of decreasing testosterone levels, which has been suggested by Marks et al. Our data are consistent with studies that have reported no effects of 5α-reductase inhibitors on muscle or bone mass. Inferences from these trials are limited by the fact that administration of 5α-reductase inhibitors increases testosterone levels, rendering it difficult to ascribe the outcomes to differences in DHT levels alone. In our trial, inhibition of endogenous testosterone by administration of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist eliminated this problem. Additionally, the high-dose dutasteride regimen effectively inhibited both steroid 5α-reductase isoenzymes."
They say "hard cases make bad law," and there is some of that here. If (big if, it seems unconfirmed) the boxer was born with DSD, then she could have female external genitals at birth, have been raised female, and ALSO have XY chromosomes and male puberty. This is getting lumped into the Trans Wars, but it really is its own thing. For sports purposes, excluding the athlete from female competition would be fair to the other athletes. That said, we should acknowledge that it isn't as simple as "a man beating up a woman" and consider that barring the athlete from competition does exclude a person that may have lived life as female.
That ‘female boxer’ had a full beard on just 3 weeks ago. 
A female boxer will die before people realize its a complete non sense.
A female boxer will die before people realize its a complete non sense.
