'Empathy' in cognitive empathy.What do you think I missed?
Like Elon Musk and Melania?That's just a twist of words. Citizenship is and should be more than just legality.
There are North Americans who hold citizenship in three or more countries. Yeah, your view that it's nothing more than a piece of paper would be correct for these "citizens".
If only she wasn't as evil as you.If only she was as smart as you are![]()
well saidIts just a piece of paper in the end?
This is just flippant bullshit.
I don't view those of us who were born and raised in our respective countries as just paper-holders.
I don't view those of us who served in our respective militaries as just paper-holders.
I don't view those of us who give back to our communities and serve communities as just paper-holders.
I view citizenship as a whole lot more than just a piece of paper in the end.
Lefties love to play the victim when theyre put in their place. Go fly a kite.'Empathy' in cognitive empathy.
You were too busy trying to appear to win.
Depends
Trump officially resigned from McDonald'sLefties love to play the victim when theyre put in their place. Go fly a kite.
Trump and Polievre will reshape North America for the better soon enough.
They are rich, powerful and white.Like Elon Musk and Melania?
and if you do not stay in the good graces of the CCP , you disappearThe national party works with the state parties to control much of corporate capitalism. As long as the states and executives don't threaten the party and its interests, they stay in the good graces of the CCP.
I never said citizenship should be excluded to a birth right. I stated "I view citizenship as a whole lot more than just a piece of paper in the end." Common definitions discuss rights and responsibilities. Without getting all law and order about it, responsibilities would include following the processes set forth by the country you want to make your new home.No it is not a twist of words.
You are conflating both.
And no it shouldn't.
No one can be a naturalized citizen if that was the case.
They are rich, powerful and white.
The right apply a different standard to them.
I am assuming you are not a CanadianI never said citizenship should be excluded to a birth right. I stated "I view citizenship as a whole lot more than just a piece of paper in the end." Common definitions discuss rights and responsibilities. Without getting all law and order about it, responsibilities would include following the processes set forth by the country you want to make your new home.
In the end, naturalization should involve more than crossing a border and being automatically cued up for a piece a paper as you describe it. I know a little about how naturalization works in the U.S. when the rules are followed. I don't know how Canada does it, but Canada doesn't have a border problem either.
There are a few members (very few) who are sympathetic of (or let's say charitable to) China. Some will disappointingly deny Hong Kong citizens (and perhaps even Taiwan) agency. This all goes through some progressive ideological mish-mash where the United States represents the Right and a lot of what is bad in the world. Countervailing forces are too be regarded and not judged.and if you do not stay in the good graces of the CCP , you disappear
Capitalism is so much easier when you can eliminate the domestic competition
how anyone can deem this a success is bewildering
I think its because the USA is the worlds most powerful country and our neighbor to the south. The dont care about canada because we are perceived as a weak country
Naturalization should only involve fulfilment of legal requirements which is the bucket all of what you said falls in.I never said citizenship should be excluded to a birth right. I stated "I view citizenship as a whole lot more than just a piece of paper in the end." Common definitions discuss rights and responsibilities. Without getting all law and order about it, responsibilities would include following the processes set forth by the country you want to make your new home.
In the end, naturalization should involve more than crossing a border and being automatically cued up for a piece a paper as you describe it. I know a little about how naturalization works in the U.S. when the rules are followed. I don't know how Canada does it, but Canada doesn't have a border problem either.
Ask that question to the right who seem to be applying double standards.hmmm ,....... judging someone based on the color of their skin ???
I doubt Dr. King would be proud of you
so what hypocritical standard works for you ?
You might be making more of it than is really there. I remember Reagan was a popular with many Canadians. Then of course there were liberal Canadians that cursed him.I doubt it. I think it is more of a vicarious symbolic representation of their political views. Or in the case of Trump... just plain Cult Worshippers.
Yes, you are correct a passport is a piece of paper. It's laminated of course. My driver's license which I also use for identification is a plastic card.Naturalization should only involve fulfilment of legal requirements which is the bucket all of what you said falls in.
As far as the immigrant is concerned citizenship is indeed a passport.
Which is a piece of paper.
Theres a lot of misconception with China in the west.There are a few members (very few) who are sympathetic (or let's say charitable) of China. Some will disappointingly deny Hong Kong citizens (and perhaps even Taiwan) agency. This all goes through some progressive ideological mish-mash where the United States represents the Right and a lot of what is bad in the world. Countervailing forces are too be regarded and not judged.
In this morality play in their minds, China was a victim and is now emerging to challenge American and Western hegemony around the world. The reality is China is still a developing country that has achieved a mid-level standard of living for its populace. It's sheer size allows it to project power on the world stage and intimidate its neighbors.
China resembles the Soviet Union more than many would want to admit. China's ability to graft market capitalism with a heavy government hand on to its autocratic governance has allowed it to go from being poor to an industrialized nation in one generation. This development path is actually not unique to China. What makes China different is its sheer size.
The next question is can China and its shaky economy persevere through the next step commonly called the middle income trap. Demographic headwinds caused by the CCP's one child policy will make the challenge greater. The easiest growth is now behind China.
Middle income trap - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
no !Ask that question to the right who seem to be applying double standards.