I'll say this: Hillary wasn't well liked. But, Trump had a lot of outside help, and I'm not talking about the Russians.
Look at all the supposed leaks coming from supposed FBI agents in September and October of that year. Then you have James Comey break protocols to announce they're re-opening the Clinton email server case just weeks before the election....and come out and say it was nothing just after early voting happened. These two things sandbagged her in a way that Trump never experience.
The Comey thing was big, and it also shows how much the "We all know Trump can't win" belief fucked people.
Comey was positioning himself in context to her winning, he didn't think what he did would tip the scale (or so seriously contribute to it tipping).
Lots of people were making that calculation, I think.
AND....looking at Russia....major news outlets covered the hacked DNC server information and ran stories from Wikileaks. Happening right now, the major media outlets are refusing to run stories on Trump from the stolen data allegedly from Iran. Would that be another nail in Trump's coffin? Hard to say.
The difference in handling the leaks is striking, but I think something that is under-rated here is the Wikileaks factor.
The news outlets could point to Wikileaks and say the emails were "already out there". They could skirt the ethics by saying
they didn't release that material.
That doesn't seem to be the case with the Trump/Stone leaks here - those were sent to the news orgs themselves.
Now, the fact that this fig leaf conveniently lets them not damage Trump shouldn't be ignored, but they do
have that fig leaf.