Okay, another 0.02, I guess.
Point is, that the Xmas tree decision was likely made - or at least vetted - by a committe of all 6 of the judges at 311 Jarvis. It's unlikely to be Justice Cohen's own sudden brainstorm. And these are judges, so they make "decisions" twenty times a day and seven days a week. And most of their decisions involve issues which are far more important - at least to the individual litigants before the court - than a decision to remove a Xmas tree from the courthouse lobby.
I suspect that the judges simply felt that removing the tree would make some non-Christian litigants feel less alienated and this is a reasonable balancing of the competing interests involved re the tree's continued presence in the building.
Guys, this is a courthouse. Why does the tree have to be there are all?? In the balancing process, it's more important that all the people coming before the court feel recognized and accomodated than that a Xmas Tree lives in the lobby for a couple of weeks.
Most of you will never visit 311 Jarvis. (I certainly hope not anyway). And the removal of a Xmas tree is not a big deal. The real genius of the Media is that it can take an incident, blow it out of all proportion and make a whole bunch of people feel angry, sad or happy about stuff that isn't directly relevant to their lives. IMHO this is just another good illustration of the power of the Media.
Point is, that the Xmas tree decision was likely made - or at least vetted - by a committe of all 6 of the judges at 311 Jarvis. It's unlikely to be Justice Cohen's own sudden brainstorm. And these are judges, so they make "decisions" twenty times a day and seven days a week. And most of their decisions involve issues which are far more important - at least to the individual litigants before the court - than a decision to remove a Xmas tree from the courthouse lobby.
I suspect that the judges simply felt that removing the tree would make some non-Christian litigants feel less alienated and this is a reasonable balancing of the competing interests involved re the tree's continued presence in the building.
Guys, this is a courthouse. Why does the tree have to be there are all?? In the balancing process, it's more important that all the people coming before the court feel recognized and accomodated than that a Xmas Tree lives in the lobby for a couple of weeks.
Most of you will never visit 311 Jarvis. (I certainly hope not anyway). And the removal of a Xmas tree is not a big deal. The real genius of the Media is that it can take an incident, blow it out of all proportion and make a whole bunch of people feel angry, sad or happy about stuff that isn't directly relevant to their lives. IMHO this is just another good illustration of the power of the Media.