Thomas Jefferson

GlennQuagmire

New member
Feb 28, 2006
628
0
0
That is the type of nefarious equivocating Team 'w' engaged in the last 8 years with DICK being their chief spokesman from the 'darkside'!
Now Gagmire carries on DICK's mindset!
Think of Gagmire as sort of a 'mini-me' DICK!....:rolleyes:
Wow...double straw man argument. Old Jones invents a position for me and then Peckerwood runs with it. Why is it that liberals can only attack straw men? Intellectual pussies much?
 

capncrunch

New member
Apr 1, 2007
1,802
3
0
Jefferson was an absolutist when it came to the separation of church and state. See Jefferson's Wall of Separation Letter.

Oddly, righties tend to forget that.

Same goes with Ayn Rand. Plenty of righties kneel at the altar of Objectivism, conveniently ignoring the fact that Rand was an avowed atheist.

So if you're going to quote Jefferson, you have to take him at 100%. Unless, in typical rightie fashion, you conveniently "forget" or "ignore" bits that don't align with current right-wing dogma.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,880
197
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Jefferson was an absolutist when it came to the separation of church and state. See Jefferson's Wall of Separation Letter.

Oddly, righties tend to forget that.

Same goes with Ayn Rand. Plenty of righties kneel at the altar of Objectivism, conveniently ignoring the fact that Rand was an avowed atheist.

So if you're going to quote Jefferson, you have to take him at 100%. Unless, in typical rightie fashion, you conveniently "forget" or "ignore" bits that don't align with current right-wing dogma.
That's just stupid.

OTB
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,082
6,215
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Wow...double straw man argument. Old Jones invents a position for me and then Peckerwood runs with it. Why is it that liberals can only attack straw men? Intellectual pussies much?
LMFAO!
JAJA could not have said that better!....:p
 

Mervyn

New member
Dec 23, 2005
3,547
0
0
"A wise & frugal government, which shall leave men free 2 regulate their own pursuits of industry & improvement, & shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government." Thomas Jefferson

Comments?
I apoligize in advance for this off topic post but I just have to comment.

When quoting someone, please don't use the NUMBER 2 to represent the WORD Too. I may be wrong but I'm pretty sure Jefferson didn't "tweet"
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,709
3
0
Sorry Captain, without bothering to get into the details Jefferson was both an idiot and a hypocrite.

And I do not believe that Alisa Zinovyevna Rosenbaum (Ayn Rand) had any great insight into the truth.
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,082
6,215
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Jefferson was a founding father who fought for freedom from Blighty while being a slaveholder.....oh and since he was partial to boning his slave girls, he had a bit of that 'jungle fever'....:p
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,880
197
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Still no danmand, chicken little fark

OTB
 

GlennQuagmire

New member
Feb 28, 2006
628
0
0
I apoligize in advance for this off topic post but I just have to comment.

When quoting someone, please don't use the NUMBER 2 to represent the WORD Too. I may be wrong but I'm pretty sure Jefferson didn't "tweet"
Yes, I copied and pasted.
 

GlennQuagmire

New member
Feb 28, 2006
628
0
0
Jefferson was an absolutist when it came to the separation of church and state. See Jefferson's Wall of Separation Letter.

Oddly, righties tend to forget that.

Same goes with Ayn Rand. Plenty of righties kneel at the altar of Objectivism, conveniently ignoring the fact that Rand was an avowed atheist.

So if you're going to quote Jefferson, you have to take him at 100%. Unless, in typical rightie fashion, you conveniently "forget" or "ignore" bits that don't align with current right-wing dogma.
More interesting non-sequiturs. In the future, why not start a new thread?
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,082
6,215
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
More interesting non-sequiturs. In the future, why not start a new thread?
LMAO!
Funny how them 'non-sequiturs' make you look quite silly!.....:p
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,082
6,215
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
The US Constitution funny you bring that up Gagmire!
Bet you even parrot your hero Dubya and think it just a god damned piece of paper!....:rolleyes:
 

GlennQuagmire

New member
Feb 28, 2006
628
0
0
The US Constitution funny you bring that up Gagmire!
Bet you even parrot your hero Dubya and think it just a god damned piece of paper!....:rolleyes:
Why would I hold the liberal Bush as a hero? He understood a few basic conservative principles, but for the most part he continued the liberal practice of wasting trillions of dollars. I thought I would never again see such a disgusting display of big government expansion in my lifetime. And then came Odumbo.

One more thing - Bush for all his failings never blamed prior administrations for his shortcomings. Odumbo can't stop blaming Bush.
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,295
21
38
Oh I get it now....you didn't realize that at the time, slaves were legal property of the slave owner. Being property, slaves were not "free to regulate their own pursuits...." To answer your question - Tom's quote applies to slaves as property. Slavery was not prohibited by the Constitution at the time, so Jefferson would expect a "good government" to stay away from his slaves. Jefferson's quote became relevant to slaves only after the 13th Amendment changed their status from property to citizen.
I was gonna say to Woodpeckr that his criticism didn't apply since Jefferson's quote was before emancipation, however, as you pointed out, it is a timeless concept for more freedom and individual wealth through less government and lower taxes.
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,082
6,215
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net

GlennQuagmire

New member
Feb 28, 2006
628
0
0
I was gonna say to Woodpeckr that his criticism didn't apply since Jefferson's quote was before emancipation, however, as you pointed out, it is a timeless concept for more freedom and individual wealth through less government and lower taxes.
Indeed. Too bad it is beyond the conceptual grasp of a liberal.
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,082
6,215
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts