Trump is really Charles Manson ii. Only the gullible believe. Unfortunately there are 10s of millions of gullible people in the US
The Great Debate
- Thread starter Big Rig
- Start date
There's no occupation..hamas is reaping the consequences of their actions and they're taking Palestinians along...
Harris ups lead over Trump, although presidential race still on knife-edge
After another shocking week, latest Guardian 10-day polling averages survey shows vice-president ahead by 2.6 points
www.theguardian.com
Its amazing how blind people are to what they refuse to see.
The ICJ ruled Israel is illegally occupying Palestine and must return it and pay restitution.
The UN just passed a resolution saying Israel must end the occupation of Palestine within a year.
And yet you still make idiotic statements like the one above.
I saw clips of that interview. Embarrassing.
Oprah had to help her answer questions that the audience posed. Her answers were all the same scripted ones that she's given since the debate. Just empty rhetoric and platitudes.
Something along these lines:
Voters: "How will you bring living costs down?"
Kamala: "When I was a kid we used to go to movies and it was fun and cheap. We must be ambitious and believe in ourselves so our children can have the same as we did."
Okay great, but how are you going to achieve that?
Kamala is the least capable individual that has ever been VP and in the running for President.
This is the person they want to have negotiate with the world's strongest dictators, negotiate trade deals with the most savvy leaders worldwide, be in charge of the border (which she failed at as VP for 4 years), reduce crime, and turn the economy around.
Sounds like you watched a clip edited to make her look bad.
Was it the full answer?
How is Trump going to achieve these goals? Please show me how he's clearly stated he's going to bring down inflation. He's the one crying interest rates were too high and now they dropped by .5 he's crying they should not have done it yet, hmmm, I wonder why.
If there was clear evidence that there was indeed collusion it would have been found. Fact is, there wasn't because it didn't happen. The whole thing was a political tactic to smear an opponent and get people sucked into headlines.
The investigation was a sham from the beginning and anyone who can take a step back and look at it can clearly see it was an example of a weaponized justice system by the Dems.
They had the entire power of the FBI at their disposal and couldn't find any tangible evidence to prove Trump was involved in collusion.
That should concern you.
More doom/gloom prophecy...you need new tactics here. these aren't working for you.
Yes and you interpret that as guilt? I interpret that as protecting the landlord from fraudulent law suits thrown at them in the future.
It was all the indictments and convictions concerned me. Plus look at Muellers quote. He's saying Trump committed crimes. That too concerns me. And it's grand juries, and then juries - in which trumps lawyers chose those jurors - that convicted him and his associates and declared his company and its activities fraudulent.
In contrast, Durham and Jim Jordan spent more money and time pursuing your narrative and found nothing.
I dont expect it to work with people who deny reality and are beyond help. You can lead the horse to the water, you cannot make it drink it.
Seems like you already drank the water...or was it Kool Aid?
Yet Durham's investigation resulted in the FBI committing to making several "adjustments" to their practices including ethics training. Why would that be if their investigation was above board and not politically motivated?
"The report found that the FBI was justified in opening its investigation in the summer of 2016 into whether the Trump campaign was coordinating with Russia to tip the election in the president’s favor. But it also identified “serious performance failures” up the bureau’s chain of command, including 17 “significant inaccuracies or omissions” in applications for a warrant from the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to monitor the communications of former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page and subsequent warrant renewals.
The errors, the watchdog said, resulted in “applications that made it appear that the information supporting probable cause was stronger than was actually the case.”
https://apnews.com/general-news-2d46c5046088ed17e57758344c6ce1e1
People who say the Mueller Report found nothing never read the report.
They also tend not to understand it is a report about the decision of the prosecutor to indict or not indict, not an extensive list of everything they found or investigated.
