Ah, the MAGA mantra has finally been found.
The Great Debate
- Thread starter Big Rig
- Start date
Right.
Which is why he would prefer someone who had all the same policies but was less personally corrupt and lying.
What a simplistic view of reality you have.
He didn't mess it up. He stood on the principles of the constitution, whether it's popular or not. Mass deportations may also be unpopular but he's drawn a line in the sand.
That's the difference between him and anything-goes Kamala. She'll support whatever she thinks is popular at any given time.
fraudsters and felons are well known for having firm principles and following them no matter what!
Last edited:
can i stipulate that Trump is truly a horrendous repugnant human being...................good.. i feel better now
but it matters not who won a debate
it matters not the concept of Democracy
it matters not abortion rights
it matters to voters all around the world their self interest,,,which means pocket book issues and the economy
i truly hope Harris wins....but unless she can convince voters about her economic vision and policies that it entails , she will lose
voters will turn and hold their nose and vote for a life long con artist and flim flam man.....God help America and the world if that happens
but it matters not who won a debate
it matters not the concept of Democracy
it matters not abortion rights
it matters to voters all around the world their self interest,,,which means pocket book issues and the economy
i truly hope Harris wins....but unless she can convince voters about her economic vision and policies that it entails , she will lose
voters will turn and hold their nose and vote for a life long con artist and flim flam man.....God help America and the world if that happens
Oh fuck off with that nimrod, wannabe intellectual act.
He HAS no "policy" except to further his own sense of grandiosity.
Healthcare? His "great" plan? He's had NINE years to set out ANY policy and the ONLY thing he accomplished was to get Roe v. Wade overturned... ONLY to further his own interests by feeding his base. He couldn't even LEAD anything on COVID except division. Takes credit for a vaccine, yet fans the flames of the conspiricy theorists.
Immigration? He managed to get a few hundred (at most) miles of fence built. Nothing else. No vision or ideas on how to deal with existing illegal immigrants or future ones. NOTHING except word salad at Rallies (his own jerk-off sessions) designed to dog whistle the inner racist iin his followers who longed for the days of (white) Leave it to Beaver. Except none of these mutts remember that the Italians, Irish, Catholics, Polish and other white immigrants were the target of anti-immigration then.
Taxes? Gave the RICHEST people a huge tax cut and NOTHING for the average Joe or family. NOTHING.
CHYNA? Tarriffs? He doesn't understand that ALL that money is passed on and paid for by the American CONSUMER.
And NONE of that is meaningful "policy" to lead a government and country as complex as the United States. It is the largest, most complex and sophisticated government, economy and country in the world. Led by a con-artist TV celebrity pussy grabbing bald faced liar.
So, no, there is no "policy" to talk meaningfully about with Trump. Because his followers see and hear what they want to see and hear in his words.
Jon Stewart Reacts to Donald Trump Saying January 6 Wasn't His Fault
Donald Trump thinks he had nothing to do with January 6? Jon Stewart can prove otherwise.» Sign up for our newsletter KnowThis to get the biggest stories of ...
youtube.com
The anti-abortion activist urging followers to abandon Trump
Among the more than 67 million people who tuned in to the first US presidential debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris was Lila Rose.
The young and charismatic founder of the anti-abortion group Live Action had hoped for big things from the Republican candidate: a bold display of anti-abortion beliefs and a promise to turn those beliefs into law.
She was quickly disappointed. While Trump criticised Democrats’ “extreme” abortion policies, he refused to take a position on a national ban, saying instead that the issue should be left to the states.
And he called himself a “leader” on IVF, putting himself at odds with Ms Rose and many in her movement, who oppose the procedure because it often involves destroying embryos.
“It was painful to watch,” Ms Rose said of Trump’s performance.
Ms Rose, 36, had always had reservations about Trump’s anti-abortion bona fides, after years of shifting positions (including previously declaring himself pro-choice) and his openness to what she called “concerning compromises”. But she, like most in her movement, had been encouraged by his first term and the three Trump-appointed Supreme Court nominees who went on to overturn Roe v Wade and end the nationwide right to abortion.
Then Trump changed course, and her disillusionment with the former president swelled. Now on his third White House run, Trump seems to be working to appeal to all sides.
He hinted he would sign federal abortion legislation, before later walking it back. He called the state-wide restrictions that came into place after Roe v Wade fell “a beautiful thing”. But later, he said abortion bans early in pregnancy went too far, suggesting Republican candidates needed to be moderate enough on the issue to “win elections”.
This summer, during the Democratic National Convention, the former president posted a statement online saying his future administration would be “great for women and their reproductive rights” - language typically used by pro-choice activists.
By late August, Ms Rose had had enough, telling her more than one million followers that Trump was “making it impossible” to vote for him.
Among the more than 67 million people who tuned in to the first US presidential debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris was Lila Rose.
The young and charismatic founder of the anti-abortion group Live Action had hoped for big things from the Republican candidate: a bold display of anti-abortion beliefs and a promise to turn those beliefs into law.
She was quickly disappointed. While Trump criticised Democrats’ “extreme” abortion policies, he refused to take a position on a national ban, saying instead that the issue should be left to the states.
And he called himself a “leader” on IVF, putting himself at odds with Ms Rose and many in her movement, who oppose the procedure because it often involves destroying embryos.
“It was painful to watch,” Ms Rose said of Trump’s performance.
Ms Rose, 36, had always had reservations about Trump’s anti-abortion bona fides, after years of shifting positions (including previously declaring himself pro-choice) and his openness to what she called “concerning compromises”. But she, like most in her movement, had been encouraged by his first term and the three Trump-appointed Supreme Court nominees who went on to overturn Roe v Wade and end the nationwide right to abortion.
Then Trump changed course, and her disillusionment with the former president swelled. Now on his third White House run, Trump seems to be working to appeal to all sides.
He hinted he would sign federal abortion legislation, before later walking it back. He called the state-wide restrictions that came into place after Roe v Wade fell “a beautiful thing”. But later, he said abortion bans early in pregnancy went too far, suggesting Republican candidates needed to be moderate enough on the issue to “win elections”.
This summer, during the Democratic National Convention, the former president posted a statement online saying his future administration would be “great for women and their reproductive rights” - language typically used by pro-choice activists.
By late August, Ms Rose had had enough, telling her more than one million followers that Trump was “making it impossible” to vote for him.
The anti-abortion activist urging followers to abandon Trump
Lila Rose says his more moderate stance has made it "impossible" to support him. Could it impact who wins the election?
www.bbc.com
If Haiti kicked out all the black people and was white only it would be a MAGA utopia. No government, lots of guns and a successful coup. What more could they ask for ?Odd how all these videos of dead cats are surfacing a week after the controversy started and not before and how no one ever called the cops and said their pet was missing.
Just putting it out there and asking questions....
great rant Shlong.....well done and well said
The Haitians are legal immigrants. He can't kick them out.
If he targets the Haitians, they will launch a slam dunk "denial of civil rights" mega-lawsuit that will make Jean Carroll and his other assinine legal capers look mild in comparison.
He can't touch the Haitians. He's fucked.
It's not like we're back in Nazi Germany and it's Hitler targeting the Jews. There's a little thing called the US Constitution.
Mitch. Those are chickens being grilled. Not cats. FFS!!!
x.com
x.com
This is what cats' legs look like!! They are totally different in shape!!!
The democrats caused Assad tear-gassing his own people and the civil war in Syria??......
Yeah. Good one!!
You're certainly entitled to your opinions, but you're not entitled to bring your vitriol.
Do you think you are the first guy on social media that felt so strongly about their beliefs that they felt it important to lash out at other members? They unfortunately force the moderators to put them down. I'm sure they often repackage themselves and return.
Let's simplify this. Of the policies Harris has made clear, I do not care for most of them. Her Senate voting record was too extreme and now she is trying to reshape her past. As I said before with Trump, WYSIWYG. With Harris, some of it is opaque.
We can go days having exchanges about the U.S. economy. Members here can tell us how great it is based on what they read and hear in Canada. That doesn't change how Americans feel about the economy. I can't change the fact that a majority of Americans trust Trump in regards to the economy over Harris. The economy as we all know is a powerful force in shaping U.S. elections.
Last edited:
C'mon, Earp. The "both sides"-ing is inane.
Does Harris lie and obfuscate to win the election?..... Yuh. All politicians do that. It's the game.
But she's competent and not senile or obviously corrupt. And he's an old freak who rambles inanely about Haitians eating pets and tried to launch a coup in 2021.
You vote quality of the human being as much as policy. She seems smart, organized, experienced and pretty solid.
And he's a silly, senile old shitbag in clown makeup.
Probably so for many, but it presumes that every Haitian came here properly. Most Americans believe there are too many immigrants coming here improperly.
