The rest of your response didn't deserve a response. The only relevant bit to the discussion was the fact that you cherry picked 5 words to fabricate your own narratives.
The Effect of the Wonderful World of Unfettered Capitalistic Greed on the Housing Market
- Thread starter Anbarandy
- Start date
Someone needs to save this country and I would take Poilievre over any of the others.
Change is needed and long overdue.
It will take whoever replaces our corrupt feds years to unravel the mess they have created since coming to power.
So you make an incorrect assumption that I don't know where that quote came from and then accuse me of trolling?
That's your logic? Lol! That's desperate coming from someone who posts fake celebrity quotes.
Here are the real numbers of those who would be hit by the capital gains tax.
PeePee would of course cancel it.
PeePee would of course cancel it.
Thanks for admitting you cherry picked. Finally. It's taken this long to get that out of you.
By the way there was nothing to cherry pick in yours. The only relevant bit was to point out your cherry picking which is what we have been discussing. The rest were ad-hominems that you like to include with every post because you know you don't have a defensible point.
I eat it and I liked it very much Who ate it? tell meSounds delicious.
Last edited:
The grass is pink.
We need to do something to turn the grass green.
The grass is not pink.
That's not cherry picking. That's highlighting nonsense.
You seem confused here. Maybe you should just give it up rather than basing your argument on similar nonsense to distract from your failure.
Right on queue...an unrelated post in an effort to distract from your usual failure.This is your logic.
You need new tricks.
All you do is troll.
What you will not and can never do, is discuss the issues with capitalism.
That is not what he said. That is again, a cherry picking to mischaracterize what he said to spin your own narratives. You seem to be having difficulty with reading comprehension. Trudeau was not trying to tell you HOW he was going to accomplish a balanced budget. That wasn't even the question. He was saying that a balanced budget was less important than taking care of Canadians and added on criticism of conservative methods of artificially balancing budgets by cutting services.
Ah. Tell me you lost the debate without telling me you lost the debate. Skoob's favourite tactic of declaring victories that don't exist when he knows he pwned himself.
Capitalism drives innovation which leads to prosperity and wealth. hint: that's where taxes come from Comrade.
But we all know you're just someone who thinks he's fooling everyone by calling Communism "socialism" and just feels entitled to everyone else's money.
Says the guy who keeps saying he wants to know HOW Poilievre is going to make Canada better.That is not what he said. That is again, a cherry picking to mischaracterize what he said to spin your own narratives. You seem to be having difficulty with reading comprehension. Trudeau was not trying to tell you HOW he was going to accomplish a balanced budget. That wasn't even the question. He was saying that a balanced budget was less important than taking care of Canadians and added on criticism of conservative methods of artificially balancing budgets by cutting services.
Ah. Tell me you lost the debate without telling me you lost the debate. Skoob's favourite tactic of declaring victories that don't exist when he knows he pwned himself.
Tell me you're not a hypocrite without telling me you're a hypocrite.
ps a balanced budget is very important. Do you even know why or are you just clueless on that subject?
Right and socialism is evil you claim.
Even though you refuse to understand its not black and white, that you love some socialism but never want to pay for it.
Police, public roads, public schools, public health care......
None of which you want to pay for.
That's the real issues, you're just a selfish, cheapskate right winger who wants to ride on the goodwill of the rest of us.
Says the guy who just wants to take more and more money from people who just happen to have more wealth.
Funding roads, police, schools, was never an issue in the past compared to now. So that argument fails every time.
The government has mismanaged the money and their solution is to just ask for more and more to make up for their incompetence and goal to to just get re-elected by bribing us with our own money.
Appears the Liberals have convinced you that someone who earns more money than you is responsible for your failure.
You don't even realize when you make a statement that proves my point.
Funny how giving tax breaks to corporations and the rich means the government has less to spend on services, isn't it?
The money (and more) is there. Mismanagement of that money and prioritizing stupid pet-projects is the reason why they want more and more. Lazy politicking. They have convinced you that the problem is with the wealthy and the companies that provide jobs. You swallowed that completely.
btw Take away all the tax breaks to corporations. Walk me through how much better that would be in your mind. Then convince me you're not a Communist.
I'll wait...
Yes and if the reporter wanted to know how Trudeau was going to balance the budget, then he should have asked that question, like I asked you how Pee Pee was going to make Canada better - to which neither you, nor Pee Pee seem to have an answer. The reporter in this case did not. So Trudeau was not required to answer a question that was not asked of him.
The reporter asked him how committed he was to balancing the budget and as usual, he started speaking and not making sense because he has no idea what he's talking about if someone else doesn't provide him a script.
Remember "the economy is people, not numbers" ...that's what happens when he starts talking about things he doesn't understand because he knows people like you will just blindly listen to what he's saying and "feel good" about it.
You asked me how Poilievre was going to make Canada better and I answered you with the info available ie get rid of the carbon tax, reduce inflationary spending, etc...but you wanted to see specific policies which I told you have not been released this far from the election but you continued to scrutinize him based on that.
yet with Trudeau you just give him a pass when he speaks nonsense.
THAT is the level of your hypocrisy.
