Its about playing the odds. Bbfs maximum odds of catching something. Pussy slide next most risky. Followed by DT in bbbj, then bbbj no dt, then daty/dato.
Where was any of that said in this thread? Where did someone say that those were safe services? This is a BBFS thread. No one was even talking about DFK/Daty, etc. No one was talking BBBJ either.That’s what I was thinking. Looks like here ppl think that only BBFS and BBBJ are unsafe and rest like DFK, DATO, DATY, DFK are all safe.
If you involved in sexual activity in exchange of “Roses” or have multiple sexual partners, you are consciously making a decision that it is ok to have few things. Every individual has different limit.
There are statistics showing frequency of stis based on behaviors. For example sometimes gonorrhea or chlamydia gets a foothold in the back of the throat and thus a dt type bj carries a bigger risk than a non dt style. Pussy slide can -not always - comingles the unfavorable bacteria in the vagina into the urethral opening of the penis, where gonorrhea and syphilis and chlamydia get their foothold. Bbfs it's all there for the transmission..I believe BBFS is having risk of HiV and rest all other services are at the same rank. Not sure on what basis you’re stack ranking?
It hasnt been said in this thread those were safe services. But these services are received and described in detail in reviews with nobody declaring them unsafe. One agency even goes as far as describing in detail these services provided by their escorts. No one has declared them usafe as far as I know.Where was any of that said in this thread? Where did someone say that those were safe services? This is a BBFS thread. No one was even talking about DFK/Daty, etc. No one was talking BBBJ either.
Can you quote posts were someone said those services were safe? In case I missed it, or maybe you need to retract your statement.
Except it was implied that we are saying they are safe. We are not. We haven’t. So that statement is 100% false. No one has made that claim. I don’t get why the implication was made that we have been claiming that it is safe or that it is safer or anything if the sort.It hasnt been said in this thread those were safe services. But these services are received and described in detail in reviews with nobody declaring them unsafe. One agency even goes as far as describing in detail these services provided by their escorts. No one has declared them usafe as far as I know.
Invasive meningococcal disease, which has a high fatality rate, is cropping up in the GTA. One of the means of transmission is exchange of saliva. BBFS is not the only activity which is not safe
When I started to hobby bbbj or dfk we’re both off the table. Seems we took a more realistic approach to what seeing an sp meant. Now it seems in this forum any most are mileage pigs and demand it all.Nobody said it was better. We just said that first - partaking in these activities thinking a bunch of prescriptions will keep you safe is not quite right and also as a provider, I am wondering were do we draw a line in what is expected
By the industry as standard services. We do not bbbj not because we want to. It's mostly because the industry in Toronto requires it and we got bills to pay. Noone is better but when does it stops?
And when it's time to take accountability for the consequences of their actions, it's the sex workers that get the warning. She becomes stigmatized by all. It's always " I caught something from her, avoid" or "she caught something 2 yrs ago, I will stay away". Like we caught something alone on our couch by the finger of Jesus himself just because as sex worker we shall be the vector of diseases, so be it!. They brought the industry there, but some don't have the maturity to partake in what they ask for. I love this job but deep down I know that if something happen to me I'll get crucify. So yeah, where do it stop and with so many of those special service, what are my odds now? It's scary.When I started to hobby bbbj or dfk we’re both off the table. Seems we took a more realistic approach to what seeing an so meant. Now it seems in this forum any most are mileage pigs and demand it all.
You just wash you hands with it because it doesn't concern your livelihood.Why would I retract anything that I said? I am just throwing a counter argument. Did you find any of my post suggesting anything?
This thread started with asking if bbfs is included in pse> moved to gfe> moved to “yeah, bbfs is bad. Not healtjy> moved to how how bbbj are real bad but dato, daty and DT are least to worry > moved to statistic> moved to yeah but I am holier than you> moved to quote me if I said this> and will continue to move as more ppl join.
this is a discussion on online platform. In the ocean of sinners, we are trying to find “holier than thou?” Just to satisfy our ego.
If you don’t offer which is currently available in market. Either your offer or you don’t offer. There is no way you complain about what wants customer or provider having. in any of the market wheever demand rises, supply comes in picture and whenever supply is too much, new demand gets created. Simple rule. (By you I didn’t mean you as “you”)
I would prefer a SP or MPA who have more towards health. By this I mean, how they present themselves or how they interact. How they are about the life ( I fucking hate YOLO) your life is your life’s you don’t compromise on it. Either your decide to die like a rotten flesh and cursing and having regrets or you just have regrets and die thinking it is right time.
Being indulge in sexual activities with more than one partner always comes with issues. Now when you re part of it, just Accept and move on. There is no reason to calling ppl who are into unsafe environment. There are provider and there are takers. That the end of it. I believe they know what they are doing.
I m not finish lol have to cook. Will get back
If you will go to the lengths of denying stigmatization and turn it into a feminist rant you miss my whole point.That’s what you think. SP getting paid and customer is paying. Do you think customer get money out of thin air to have fun with SP?
They “save” and spend which eventually become your earning and savings.
I am not washing hands at all. I think you trying to put everything on “customer” or “men”. Won’t fly at all.
So, we shouldn't talk to our kids about sex, either?Comprehend my comment
Healthy discussion of BBFS ?
Stop trolling
This dude is hilarious. The tangent he goes on and on about …..If you will go to the lengths of denying stigmatization and turn it into a feminist rant you miss my whole point.
Not true in the UK.In The past forty years in Uk German. PSE was always BBFS.
Back in Oz after they legalized and regulated the brothels with mandatory cfs and cbj the rates of stis were lower than the general population. However, when a lady did get something, 90% of the time she got it from her boyfriend, whom she did bbfs with, and he likely messing around on the side.I mentioned it, but it is certainly worth mentioning again. In both the U.S. and Australia, the increased chatter about BBFS arose from its offering among Asian agencies. And from Seeing Arrangement encounters mentioned on ISG, where many of those women famously aren’t sex workers and often don’t use condoms with their many boyfriends.
I think the recent bust of an Asian agency in the U.S. that did screening, and kind of broke the “truce” that had emerged where law enforcement was not pursuing providers who did heavy screening, occurred because the group was blatantly advertising BBFS.
There is a level of “service matching“ that occurs, so it is of concern among providers in general.
Personally, I don’t think that the acceptance of BBBJ occurred entirely due to service matching. The statistics just didn’t support CBJs. A big part of STI transmission is simply the contact and absorption time. The mouth and throat just don’t offer the absorption time that the vagina and anus do, and from the male perspective, the viral levels in saliva just don’t post the risk that vaginal fluids and vaginal sores do when you compare the time the uncondomed penis is being bathed in fluid and bacteria.
Personally, I think BBFS, particularly when it is being offered without a full STI panel test taken within a few days before the BBFS event, is bad for the industry.
Increases in STI levels, which are indeed occurring in the general population likely as a result of decreased condom use, will turn a lot more law enforcement attention to the industry. And if ladies coming of age hear about increased STIs in sex work, they are less likely to enter the field.
Sadly, women who work with Asian incall groups who speak little or no English and move around a lot, don’t likely have a lot of control over their service offerings. So this isn’t the group you want ”leading” anyone. Really the same with Seeking Arrangement ladies, who don’t view themselves as sex workers.
Personally I hope it stops before lots of bad things happen to individuals and the industry. It was largely condom use that stopped the herpes and HIV epidemics of the 1970s and 1980 - 1990s. I can’t believe how quickly people forget, or never knew.
Yes, but just like the U.S. and its legal Nevada brothels, almost no one goes to the non-Asian legal places in Australia due to the clinical level of services.Back in Oz after they legalized and regulated the brothels with mandatory cfs and cbj the rates of stis were lower than the general population. However, when a lady did get something, 90% of the time she got it from her boyfriend, whom she did bbfs with, and he likely messing around on the side.
Anyhow, back to the argument.