I just think a lot of these guys should spend more of their conspiracy theory time on following the money. They would be very disappointed as to how simple a lot of these things are.DonQuixote said:The Pentagon has a slush fund for such operations.
The industrial-military complex - controlled and operated
by the neo-cons - had a deal worked out with Chaney
where GWB would authorize the operation as payback
for the voting fraud in Florida in 2000.
It was all preordained by the Tri-Lateral Commission and
the Bildenberg Group. The operatives were members of
the secretive Order of Knights Templar and conducted
through their surrogates in the Middle East, specifically
Saudi Arabia and Egypt.
Should Markjfr be banned?
- Thread starter onthebottom
- Start date
Don, you left out a very important element. The Royal Family were involved, they will use the same people that set-up Diana.
Ever been to Austin.....DonQuixote said:The Pentagon has a slush fund for such operations.
The industrial-military complex - controlled and operated
by the neo-cons - had a deal worked out with Chaney
where GWB would authorize the operation as payback
for the voting fraud in Florida in 2000.
It was all preordained by the Tri-Lateral Commission and
the Bildenberg Group. The operatives were members of
the secretive Order of Knights Templar and conducted
through their surrogates in the Middle East, specifically
Saudi Arabia and Egypt.
LOL
OTB
There's insurance against this type of thing......Quest4Less said:
Spooky8 by Bob King - Beautiful read......
danmand said:We remember your views on the royals.
OK get it now. Much as I am a major monarchist I shouldn't even hint at things like that but i do think the hand of Liz and the British spooks was at work. Diana was becoming too problematic.
Good point. He should not be banned.maxweber said:
Who said? " I disagree with what you say, but defend to death your right to say it"
On the other hand, this is a quote for Mark:
"A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject"
Winston Churchill
lookingforitallthetime said:
Agreed, Mark should NOT be banned.
However some neocons around here feel their new chant of:
"9/11 changed everything!",
trumps that quaint democratic notion....
As Dubya chirps:
You are either with me,
or your are the enemy !!!
onthebottom said:
While the current round are not that attractive , agreed, diana served her purpose and produced an heir and a spare that got things back on track. It is not the actual occupants of the position as much as the institution that it represents that is important.
WoodPeckr said:Agreed, Mark should NOT be banned.
However some neocons around here feel their new chant of:
"9/11 changed everything!",
trumps that quaint democratic notion....
As Dubya chirps:
You are either with me,
or your are the enemy !!!
I am no neo-con, thats like being a born again. I was stamped TORY at birth and have remained consistent. Earlier in this thread I argued that while he is a total twit Markjfr should not be banned. He is distasteful but he has the right to speak.
None of it is the least bit important but it's all that a largely irrelevant UK has left of a once great empire. What I find completely unbelievable is that former colonies (like those up North and their more sensible Cousins in Australia) still fall in line. I was living in Sydney when the last vote on keeping the current relationship with the UK was up and was most disappointed in my many oz friends that supported the monarchy. Silly PoMEsLancsLad said:
OTB
Glad to see you have some liberal in ya.....maybe there's hope for you.LancsLad said:
That tory thing.....well that's just a problem you will have to live with.....
It is very difficult to explain to those that are not of a Royalist, Shire stock but it is a fundemental part of what we are. When the world is going to crap people draw faith from their institutions.
