I'm sure you're willing to give up 60% of your home to Palestinian refugees, you have more than you need now that you're stuck with the walker.
Shall we send your info to immigration so they can pick suitable new landlords for you?
SCREAMS BEFORE SILENCE
- Thread starter latinboy
- Start date
I'm sure you're willing to give up 60% of your home to Palestinian refugees, you have more than you need now that you're stuck with the walker.
Shall we send your info to immigration so they can pick suitable new landlords for you?
Who cares, Shazi.
There is no history and notsituation that justifies zionist genocide.
You cannot rationalize killing women and children, stealing their land forcing them to live in a death camp.
Considering what they have now, it was a good deal.
Tom Hagen : When a plot against the Emperor failed... the plotters were always given a chance... to let their families keep their fortunes. Right?
Frank Pentangeli : Yeah, but only the rich guys, Tom. The little guys got knocked off and all their estates went to the Emperors. Unless they went home and killed themselves, then nothing happened. And the families... the families were taken care of.
Tom Hagen : That was a good break. A nice deal.
Hamas is only giving bad deals to the Gazans. Die by being human shields or die by letting letting us withhold your food.
How was it a good deal letting the people who are still stealing land and committing genocide to do it, come in?
Ask your buddy, Kaut. After I said that the Arabs should have taken the deal, he just said that hindsight is 20:20.
The deal should never have been offered in the first place.
Palestine should have stayed as a pluralistic state and not been given away to foreign terrorists.
The curtains have been opened on zionism.
There's no going back.
Problem with your logic is Hamas rejected it. Just another case where you think it okay to completely ignore what Palestinians say.
Yes, a poll of Palestinians with similar results to Palestinian polling for more than a decade. They have been clear that their goal is a Palestinian only state. Every time you say otherwise, you just expose yourself as an elitist clown.
And here's the moronic fake history
Bullshit. Pre-European colonization, there was not authority overseeing Canada. Europeans colonized the place. The Ottomans and later the Brits did have government and administration with rules for immigration. All you are doing is showing your elitist thinking Ottomans were incapable of running their own empire
Yes, according to your ridiculous double standard, you as a Catholic and an Indian have absolutely no legitimacy in being in Canada.
Your arguments are simply incoherent ramblings, trying to justify your actions while demonizing people who did the same thing (while ignoring that around half of Israeli jews are Arabs..
But the deal was offered and done so by the powers that be at that time.
So, basically you both agree that the Palis were stupid to turn down the deal. They were offered land with which they could have that pluralistic state or any other kind of state. Instead they walk away with nothing and become eternal refugees. That's a perfect example of biting off your nose to spite your face. They should have taken the deal.
No, the Brits were wrong to offer the deal. They backstabbed the Palestinians after their support in WWII.
zionism = genocide
Do you think that was smart?
Do you think being on the same moral level as nazis is a smart move, Shazi?
No, Hamas accepted it and Netanyahu refused.
Netanyahu says he won’t agree to a deal that ends the war in Gaza, testing the latest truce proposal
That is a crappy, lie, basketcase.
Is that seriously the best a hasbara troll can come up with to defend the genocide you've been waiting for?
Regardless the deal WAS offered and the Arabs had to make a choice. They said "no" to the land offered, chose war and have had no homeland since. They chose to be eternal refugees that only seem to be able to always pick violence.
They bit off their nose to spite their face. They were stupid then and they were stupid on Oct.7.
The story has always been that Israel wants a temporary truce to return the hostages followed by a return to genocide.
Hamas wants a lasting ceasefire and an end to the ceasefire.
You want more genocide.
The original zionists were terrorists, Shazi.
You keep arguing you can't make deal with terrorists.
Regardless, its time to end zionism altogether.
Zionism = genocide.
We are talking about the deal that was offered in 1948 by the UK and the choice that the Arabs were offered.
The Arabs had to make a choice. Don't deflect. The Arabs chose violence over land. That is the reality of that time.
They chose violence over land. They screwed their people into becoming refugees with no land of their own.
So you agree that there was a deal offered. If they'd have accepted it, they wouldn't be refugees now. It's a very basic concept that cannot be refuted. They had a choice to accept that land, but they chose war.
Similar threads
