She has a path to the EC, though she's as likely to win as butler is.
It will be a miracle if she gets close to her 2016 result. ( 1.07% )
She is more likely to end up somewhere in the normal 0.3% range the Greens get.
She might become a Ross Perot or a Ralph Nader, who knows.
With a massive push of everyone trying to make her the anti-Israel candidate she might coordinate everyone who wants to cast a vote that way and who knows, maybe she gets results like Perot did - Zero electoral college delegates.
But that would absolutely make people realize the Anti-Israel vote was significant and might even cause the policy shift you say you want to see.
Being like Ralph Nader though, why would you pitch that since he is remembered as "the guy that made Bush president even though people wanted Al Gore, thus being a massive reason for the Afghanistan and Iraq wars"?
I thought you completely rejected this characterization of what you were doing?
But if you support democracy you have to support people choosing to vote for whoever they want and its up to the dems to convince them otherwise.
Yes.
And part of convincing them otherwise is pointing out that casting a vote that makes things you want to see happen less likely is counter productive.
I do like how dishonest that tweet is, though, acting as if "Did not vote" would all vote Green.
It's a clever piece of bullshit.
