Just like we were told not to criticize 2020 loser trump because after he lost, he was irrelevant.It's ok, we've been reassured repeatedly that Trump is too incompetent to accomplish any of it, so no one needs to worry about it.
Just like we were told not to criticize 2020 loser trump because after he lost, he was irrelevant.It's ok, we've been reassured repeatedly that Trump is too incompetent to accomplish any of it, so no one needs to worry about it.
Jill seeing is also on Putin's payroll. She was feted by him multiple times, including a dinner where Mike Flynn was there too.It will be a miracle if she gets close to her 2016 result. ( 1.07% )
She is more likely to end up somewhere in the normal 0.3% range the Greens get.
With a massive push of everyone trying to make her the anti-Israel candidate she might coordinate everyone who wants to cast a vote that way and who knows, maybe she gets results like Perot did - Zero electoral college delegates.
But that would absolutely make people realize the Anti-Israel vote was significant and might even cause the policy shift you say you want to see.
Being like Ralph Nader though, why would you pitch that since he is remembered as "the guy that made Bush president even though people wanted Al Gore, thus being a massive reason for the Afghanistan and Iraq wars"?
I thought you completely rejected this characterization of what you were doing?
Yes.
And part of convincing them otherwise is pointing out that casting a vote that makes things you want to see happen less likely is counter productive.
I do like how dishonest that tweet is, though, acting as if "Did not vote" would all vote Green.
It's a clever piece of bullshit.
Indeed.Just like we were told not to criticize 2020 loser trump because after he lost, he was irrelevant.
One might be tempted to look at her other foreign policy positions.Jill seeing is also on Putin's payroll. She was feted by him multiple times, including a dinner where Mike Flynn was there too.
Nope.Fuck her. Big time. And Cornell West too. USA democracy is on the line.
As Lynn Cheney said, the country can survive bad policy, but it cannot survive a president who torches the constitution.
Faked my post in your typical pathetic loser way just to bring your Jew hatred into yet another thread.Fixed your post for more accurate representation of my views.
Its amazing how often you get them wrong.
Intentionally.
I don't want rump in power, Biden is better generally but can no longer be supported because of his aiding of the genocide.
Jill thinks Putin was justified in invading Ukraine and she has stated she wants the US out of NATO.No, I want Jill Stein in power.
If I could vote in the US, I'd vote for her.
You argue that voting to help the hitler of this century aid his genocide is the most rational position?No one should worry about any of that at all, because Biden is Genocide Joe and therefore him being defeated is the only important thing anyone of moral conscience should concern themselves with.
Every other factor ever pales in comparison and Biden losing and Trump winning will make America completely change its mind about Israel (the only important thing anyone on the planet should concern themselves about) in 4 years and then everything will be fixed.
See!
It's all very rational.
Trumps people are the ones talking about nuking Gaza. Biden on the other hand go a ceasefire motion passed at the UNSC.You argue that voting to help the hitler of this century aid his genocide is the most rational position?
Biden is worse, he is pretending to call for peace while aiding and enabling genocide.Trumps people are the ones talking about nuking Gaza. Biden on the other hand go a ceasefire motion passed at the UNSC.
LOL - Oh my, we have gone to the pearl-clutching and fainting couch.You argue that voting to help the hitler of this century aid his genocide is the most rational position?
Some are just making a point.It astounds me to see some interviews with the Arab community in Michigan going anti Biden and pro Trump, when Trump will be as bad if not worse in his support for Netanyahu and for Trumps support for a new Muslim ban.
It's like "you're fucking over my people so bad that we'll punish you by voting for a guy who will fuck over my people twice as bad as you."
I'm hoping they're just making a point (and a reasonable one for sure).
Not at all, valcazar.LOL - Oh my, we have gone to the pearl-clutching and fainting couch.
Keep confessing. Geno.Not at all, valcazar.
Its just clear from this discussion that there is no limit towards what you will support in order to get the person you want in power.
Or you have done your due diligence and while you admit its genocide you are actually quietly supporting it.
You know this and mocked it.
Only a true zealot would consider a moderate who got a ceasefire approved at the UN to be worse than a party threatening o nuke Gaza.Biden is worse, he is pretending to call for peace while aiding and enabling genocide.
...
But I'm sure you'll say Hamas is keeping Israeli hostages in luxury (even though your UN, ICC, and ICJ demanded their release half a year ago.Confessing to what, gvir?
...
What ceasefire?Only a true zealot would consider a moderate who got a ceasefire approved at the UN to be worse than a party threatening o nuke Gaza.
Israel is holding about 8000 hostages as well, none of those have been released.But I'm sure you'll say Hamas is keeping Israeli hostages in luxury (even though your UN, ICC, and ICJ demanded their release half a year ago.
The one Biden pushed, got Israel to accept, and get approved by the UNSC. I know Hamas rejected it but I know you want to ignore Hamas' agency.What ceasefire?
...
Hamas didn't reject it, Netanyahu did.The one Biden pushed, got Israel to accept, and get approved by the UNSC. I know Hamas rejected it but I know you want to ignore Hamas' agency.
BTW. At the debate, your guy Trump said he wants Israel to "finish the job".
You're insane.Hamas didn't reject it...