Is that what the problem is? Because right now it is the women who take more of the charges. So that is okay? But now that the GOV wants to flip it, it is an issue? I know for some men that is their issue with all this.
new prostitution bill by spring
- Thread starter gtamassage
- Start date
Is that what the problem is? Because right now it is the women who take more of the charges. So that is okay? But now that the GOV wants to flip it, it is an issue? I know for some men that is their issue with all this.
Jessica's right. I don't know why, all the frenzy !? I call it, sort of a witchhunt, Nothing's going to change, At least for most of us.
After all, there is a smart way of indulging in this industry.
You're welcome! My next scheduled post is in September. It's hard to make that .2 of a post.
Considering how uninformed some of the posters are, feel free to bump it up to an even three...four of the keyboard can take it!
Hopefully the conservatives get fucked in the ass over this in the next election trying to kiss ass of the 15% of canadians that voted them in power.
The city licensed his business knowing it was an escort agency, they knew he would need to hire employees - therefore they are equally guilty.I was pointing out the facts, that's all
I agree with your point, and think he maybe needed a better lawyer. The charges stem from an investigation that took place before the laws were struck down, maybe that had something to do with it. Maybe our resident terb lawyers can help. Isn't there some sort of entrapment defense he could have used also? This undercover officer asked him for a job, she came to him, as did all his employees. He didn't go to them.
The citizens of Edmonton hired and elected those who established these rules and profited from them - therefore they should each be fined and made to do community work.
Ads are meant to entice, they show the rewards you can receive with no experience and no education. They can be very seductive to women who may not have considered being an escort.
True, but the city knows the intent is sexual services and their concern is the owner's background, the location and making a few dollars.
Don't mistake the public consultation for a referendum - it was only a public relations exercise that they'll taper to support what they were going to do anyway. It gives the voting public an impression that they've had some input and it serves no other purpose.
Perhaps the opposition could use this against them, and make an issue of the Cons not making the results public.
No... they're just mindless automatons who will toe the party line and abuse their majority by ramming unconstitutional legislation through. Like I said, Bedford and her cronies were (and still are) idiots for even thinking that a court challenge might be a good idea. We all better get used to bending over, because this government is going to royally fuck us up the ass!
Well, there you go... that doesn't exactly instill me with a lot of confidence...
Heavily biased, value-laden piece in today's Star (Heather Mallick) that blindly paints all johns as "losers" and all prostitutes as "victims" (among other views).
The writer isn't a law maker and is entitled to her 'opinion', but nonetheless, attitudes like hers reflect how much ignorance there is surrounding the sex trade.
The writer isn't a law maker and is entitled to her 'opinion', but nonetheless, attitudes like hers reflect how much ignorance there is surrounding the sex trade.
Attitudes like hers are what are going to need to change before anything else does. I can't believe the ignorance.
