Simple answer: 1) Pay more carbon taxes even though no one can mathematically demonstrate how the money collected directly improves climate...and 2) feel good about yourself while complaining about high grocery prices.
More Woke Nonsense
- Thread starter The Oracle
- Start date
Fundamental difference between climate change (global warming) and weather changes. All those wildfires just due to bad luck with the weather? Spent those science classes trying to look up Susie's skirt, did you?
No no i do agree with you. Many wildfires, floods, storm, invasions of seaweeds, etc... are happening more frequently due to our, human, impact on climate changes. We are indeed an accelerator of those.
The problem is that whatever we do climate will still change. And many arrogant Idiots are not capable of grasping that. By that i simply mean reducing our impact on climate change.
We can still stop the biggest changes from happening, but only barely.
The 5 five tipping points are almost here, after that its runaway.
Cutting the carbon tax only benefits the 1% now.
Canadian military bases mandate menstruation kits in men's bathrooms
In a move to align with the Liberal government’s commitment to “inclusivity,” Canadian military bases are required to provide menstrual products, including tampons and pads, in men's washrooms by December 15.
tnc.news
that is incorrect and pure bullshit propaganda
Opinion | We’re Safer From Climate Disasters Than Ever Before
Though it receives little mention from activists or the media, weather-related deaths have fallen dramatically.
www.wsj.com
total hubris to think man gets to control climate with 120 part per million pf co2
Last edited:
really ?
SERIES: What the media won't tell you about . . . Floods
Let's take a look at what the IPCC and recent research actually says
rogerpielkejr.substack.com
Really?
SERIES: What the media won't tell you about . . . hurricanes
Let's take a look at what the IPCC and official data really say
rogerpielkejr.substack.com
so were you misinformed/ uneducated or do you intentionally try to mislead other people?
You've used this cherry picked chart with faulty stats before.
There is a reason it stops at 2017 and a reason why the numbers used to be higher but you don't care.
You have your propaganda and you're sticking with it.
Typical science denier.
I used it before because it is correct
oh but i do care
so ironic that extension back to 1926 was require to highlight the misleading propaganda by slimly alarmists
And extending the clock back further before the arrival of Europeans and land clearing the burn acreage was even higher
you are too ignorant to understand high school level science
you had your chance and you failed out
you are a laughing stock who is not taken seriously by anyone
go sit in the corner with your dunce cap on
Attachments
Your chart was removed by the government because the data was wrong, but the Heartland Institute and Watts or whoever you're quoting still uses it.
The numbers from the 20's and 30's are all wrong, there was problem with the historical records counting intentional fires as forest fires.
Which is why its no off the forestry site and they have this statement:
Give up already...it's Liberal scam...albeit a convincing one.
And besides, soon everyone in a Liberal riding will be complaining to their local MP that's it's making things unaffordable for them and it will be waived so that they can get re-elected.
You are being played.
Sure boob, you'll once again back a conservative who will give tax breaks to the rich and then tell you that you saved 10 cents at the pump and you'll buy it.
haha how quickly the carbon tax is dropped when re-election is threatened. Maybe they'll get back to saving the planet after they win? Because you know, it's a priority for them. Lol!
You are being played and you don't even know it. It's funny and sad at the same time.
I will only explain if you can accept the truth without hating yourself even more than you do now.
