MLB Free Agent Season

maurice93

Well-known member
Mar 29, 2006
5,970
1,011
113
I don't count 2020/2021 stats it was Covid and things were messed up. The only thing I can explain in 2022 was that he was very unhappy and not focused. 2023 is what made me believe that he hadn't 'lost' it. OK maybe the stats are inflated based on metrics but 2024 regression wasn't just him - Swanson, Hoerner, Morel all were down from their 2023 stats. Also lets face it the Cubs aren't a great hitting lineup like the Yankees are. Which is why I expect Bellinger will be somewhere closer to his 2017-2019, 2023 stats. I easily see him hitting 30 bombs and 90+ RBI batting 5th in the lineup.
2020 for sure. 2021 things were largely back to 100% normal in MLB in the states, except for the Jays. Anyway lots of excuses for various years. He was however the best player in baseball in 2019 (arguably) and he is still only 29, so maybe I will be surprised. We will come back to this one at year end!

Regarding the Yankees lineup, is it really a good lineup top to bottom?
If he is batting in front of Judge he will get some protection stats boost, but studies have found that while its not NIL its not as significant as people expect. If he is batting behind Judge, its not a bad lineup but you are not surrounded by much better than what the Cubs had last year.

A general point more on the Yanks (rather than Bellinger), I don't see this great deep Yankees lineup. Judge is the best hitter in baseball.
Stanton? He was great in the 24 playoffs, but he has not been a good hitter since 2021.
Goldschmidt? He was really good as late as 2022, but he has been on a steady decline and is coming off a sub 100 OPS at the age of 37.
Chisholm? 99 and 107 OPS the last 2 years. Although he was very good in a small sample with the Yanks (130), so we shall see on this one. Jazz and NY might be a good fit,

Wells and Volpe are young so there might be progression.
 

maurice93

Well-known member
Mar 29, 2006
5,970
1,011
113
I’ve seen YouTube video breakdowns about his hard hit ball percentage as well and all that stuff.. I just always get a feeling about this guy that if he works hard, he will have success. I feel like he’s got many good years left. Cody might become the Brett Saberhagen of hitting. One good year, one stinker, one good year, one stinker, etc., etc.……

Philip
Bret Saberhagen - great name from the past. Your point is valid on him - great years in 1985, 89, 94. In the other years he wasn't bad -- either an average starter or a good starter, but not close to an elite like one of those either years. Bellinger has had a couple of stinkers.

We shall see on Bellinger. As I mentioned in my post to KD, he is still 29. And had an epic year as a 23 year old. I'm not counting on him being terroble, but I think an OPS+ season of 110-115 (just above average) rather than a season of 135+.... or would need to be over 140 if he got to 40 homeruns. Let's revisit this one at year end.
 

maurice93

Well-known member
Mar 29, 2006
5,970
1,011
113
…. he also spoke poorly against the organization and questioned the organization. That’s ALSO a bad apple in a bunch. Not saying he was wrong……

Philip
Bassitt's a bit of a strange guy,
That being said I listened to that whole interview with Chris Rose as I listen to the talkin baseball group of podcasts from time to time biking. The whole interview wasn't really bad at all, unlike the snippets that were pulled, which taken alone (outside of the context of the whole interview) didn't sound good. But I found listening to the whole interview allowed me to appreciate the context behind some of those comments more - they sound very different if taken as part of what he was saying over the 30 minutes.

I don't really think he is a bad apple. Teammates seem to like him, even though he is very aloof on the mound. Seems to be a great influence for someone like Francis. He was also apparently fairly important in getting Scherzer done. And I could be wrong, but I think he was one of the guys that showed up for the Jays as they tried to recruit Sasaki.
 

maurice93

Well-known member
Mar 29, 2006
5,970
1,011
113
I think the "insiders" are accurate -- we are very much in on these guys like Alonso, but we are either being used for leverage or as a secondary fallback position. We can make offers because we are a rich team.

I'll give a few positives about these second place finishes -- be it leverage or fallback
1) Reason we finish second so often is that we are willing to have a huge payroll. Rogers is paying up to a level not seen in the Ricciardi or AA days. We are a top 5 payroll as of now from what I saw after signing Scherzer and Santander - Rogers wants to win.
2) Finishing second with Sasaki (where money the team could pay was irrelevant) , shows that our market / brand still has some attraction to star players.

Note both #1 and #2 are fully independent of Shatkins - they are actually hindrances to them at this point. The quicker we can move on from Shatkins the better -- so that #1 and #2 are still assets moving forward Our attendance is way above anybody else in baseball below .500. And our TV numbers are the highest in baseball by a fair amount. Let's hope they don't get eroded much.

I also think if the team was at the level it was after the 2021 (or even 2022 season), we would have allure not to be a secondary fallback for some players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

maurice93

Well-known member
Mar 29, 2006
5,970
1,011
113
As I was reading your post, this is exactly what I was thinking.

Kudos to Rogers. It's unfortunate that he hired a couple of incompetent guys. (Atkins indirectly)
Yes the kudos can only be partial at this point.
1) There is spending (A Pass) 2) There is hiring/firing. (A Fail)

Unlike others here I was pretty happy about where the Jays were at the end of 2021 and gave Shatkins a much better grade than others. But since then it has been a disaster. In 2021 -- Youth, smart moves on vets, and a system that had become top 10 in baseball that had helped in trades (Berrios) and looked like it was going to produce for the big team. But most of those prospects have flopped, have not been replaced, and the younger guys that came up a year or two before 2021, in 2021, or in 2022 have almost all had periods of signficant regression. Even someone like Vlad, while great in 2024, fell apart relatively for a few years. Too many developmental issues, at the big league level included.
 
Last edited:

onomatopoeia

Bzzzzz.......Doink
Jul 3, 2020
21,633
17,450
113
Cabbagetown
... And our TV numbers are the highest in baseball by a fair amount...
This I strongly doubt. There are probably more TV viewers in Japan watching the Dodgers than the entire audience for the Blue Jays.

These numbers are not for 2024, but they are recent:

Table-1.-–-TV-Contract-Revenue-by-Team-mil.-US.jpg

The Blue Jays get an equal cut of the revenue from the US nationally televised games. If they appear at all on US network TV during the regular season, it would be by contractual obligation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

maurice93

Well-known member
Mar 29, 2006
5,970
1,011
113
This I strongly doubt. There are probably more TV viewers in Japan watching the Dodgers than the entire audience for the Blue Jays.

These numbers are not for 2024, but they are recent:

View attachment 404279

The Blue Jays get an equal cut of the revenue from the US nationally televised games. If they appear at all on US network TV during the regular season, it would be by contractual obligation.
The Jays local TV audience numbers for the Jays are the best in baseball (if you keep it to the local market) I'm trying to find the article I found last year and posted on another board. The Jays are helped by the fact that their local TV area is now 40 million people, which is the largest in baseball, and far above the average of the 30 teams.

If you add Japan then I 100% agree the Dodgers home broadcasts get more fans. But those revenues are shared as they are part of the international pool. There are ways though the Dodgers can benefit solely from Japan ball games (merch + auxiliary deals).

That $200M in the table is the Dodgers local TV deal only.. it doesn't include Japan -- its an absurdly large contract that dwarfs everybody, giving them a huge advantage.

Your revenue table is irrelevant as it pertains to the Jays, Almost all the teams above have a local TV contract with a non-related entity, so the number stated in the table is the real value of the deal. The Jays deal is likely an intercompany charge, between the Jays and another division with Rogers, so its not representative of the fair value of the contract.

The fact that the Jays are spending like crazy, despite being part of a public company who care about profits. shows that they are deriving lots of money from their local TV broadcasts.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Toronto Passions

Toronto Passions

Trusted Since 2001!
Supporting Member
So many Mets podcasters are so confident that they sign Guerrero this next off season. Just saying….

Philip
 

The Oracle

Pronouns: Who/Cares
Mar 8, 2004
27,023
54,029
113
On the slopes of Mount Parnassus, Greece
So many Mets podcasters are so confident that they sign Guerrero this next off season. Just saying….

Philip
Hands off!!.......He's Yankee bound...He's going to look great in Pinstripes and will be a perfect fit in the Bronx
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: tml and mitchell76

mitchell76

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2010
24,037
10,734
113
I think the "insiders" are accurate -- we are very much in on these guys like Alonso, but we are either being used for leverage or as a secondary fallback position. We can make offers because we are a rich team.

I'll give a few positives about these second place finishes -- be it leverage or fallback
1) Reason we finish second so often is that we are willing to have a huge payroll. Rogers is paying up to a level not seen in the Ricciardi or AA days. We are a top 5 payroll as of now from what I saw after signing Scherzer and Santander - Rogers wants to win.
2) Finishing second with Sasaki (where money the team could pay was irrelevant) , shows that our market / brand still has some attraction to star players.

Note both #1 and #2 are fully independent of Shatkins - they are actually hindrances to them at this point. The quicker we can move on from Shatkins the better -- so that #1 and #2 are still assets moving forward Our attendance is way above anybody else in baseball below .500. And our TV numbers are the highest in baseball by a fair amount. Let's hope they don't get eroded much.

I also think if the team was at the level it was after the 2021 (or even 2022 season), we would have allure not to be a secondary fallback for some players.
Jays will finish with 80 wins at best this year. IMHO, Scherzer is too old to help the Jays. Knowing the Jays luck, Scherzer will probably get injured, early in the season. IMHO, rogers will still draw good crowds to the Jay games, due to their stadium renovations!!
 

Toronto Passions

Trusted Since 2001!
Supporting Member
Supposedly Pete Alonso was signing a $166 million deal with the Blue Jays.
…this is why I don’t take that podcast “Jays Digest“ very seriously. Popular podcasts have so much ability to spin rumors out of control. According to that guy, Nick Goss, or whatever his name is, such shit talk, optimism, spinning rumors out of control. The most reputable off-season reporting in Toronto comes from Ben Nicholson Smith and Shi Davidi.

Philip
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76
Toronto Escorts