Oh yes they did go too far.It is known as sampling perfectly legal so long as you don't go too far which I don't believe they did.
Well, "reminiscent of the same groove" doesn't = plagiarism and a group of greedy, gravy-train riding heirs doesn't necessarily = a strong case. Now, if you're talking same melody, maybe. But the melody doesn't sound the same to me.Oh yes they did go too far.
http://www.babble.com/entertainment...robin-thickes-blurred-lines-settlement-offer/
It's without a doubt a clear interpolation of Gaye's song and should have been credited as such. If Thicke and Pharrell don't settle with a figure to Gaye's estates' liking, they will lose if it goes to court.
Are you shitting me? She was an insanely lucrative cash cow while still underaged. I'm sure he can forgive anything, considering just how much money she brought into that talentless white trash clan.In my mind....there is no possible way Billy Ray Cyrus can be proud of his Disney girl anymore.
The problem with that argument is that the VMA's are directed at the teenaged female audience. And like Christina Aguilera and Brittany Spears before her and Madonna before them, Miley Cyrus's handlers have decided that the best way of selling crappy music to that demographic is doing "bad" things that piss mom and dad off. It's the old, old story of rebellion by proxy.Plagiarism aside, the fuss is misdirected.
I have no interested in watching Mylie Cyrus go skankenstance, it deflects a bigger problem. Corporations have been objectifying children as sex objects for profit, for decades and getting away with it. Child porn has proliferated and pedophilia is becoming commonplace. These so called parental groups kicking up a fuss over the VMA's can't see the shit pile from the turds. Perhaps they should pay more attention to actually parenting instead of looking for scapegoats for their failures.
I'm too old school and square to pay attention to the VMA's. If you're going to be an entertainer a modicum of talent would help.
make no mistake Jackson grabbing his crotch was equally ick worthy.............cmon Atmann you are smarter than this, sexuality has nothing to do with it ..self serving, attention whoring at its best, the goal?..exposure{pardon the pun} and increased earning power..Having difficulty understanding all the fuss.
Doesn't seem any more racy to me than Michael Jackson grabbing his crotch while prancing around the stage 20 or 30 years ago.
Oh, wait .... it's a woman expressing sexuality. That's what's so terrible. Now I get it.
Yeah, we've come a long way, baby.
Right on all counts about Michael Jackson. Self-serving, attention whoring at its best.make no mistake Jackson grabbing his crotch was equally ick worthy.............cmon Atmann you are smarter than this, sexuality has nothing to do with it ..self serving, attention whoring at its best, the goal?..exposure{pardon the pun} and increased earning power..
I never did understand the whole Michael Jackson crotch grabbing thing. I've seen rap artists do it too, though. I dunno...I still don't get it?????make no mistake Jackson grabbing his crotch was equally ick worthy....
The beat and bassline is the basis for the entire song. The only thing that is different from Gaye's version is the melody. It's obviously a much more commercial melody which is guaranteed to sell to the peons. But there is no song with just the melody and it's not as difficult to write a pop melody over a plagiarized track as it is to write a brand new song from top to bottom .Well, "reminiscent of the same groove" doesn't = plagiarism and a group of greedy, gravy-train riding heirs doesn't necessarily = a strong case. Now, if you're talking same melody, maybe. But the melody doesn't sound the same to me.
try looking up songs and vids by Millie Jackson...Cyrus is a piker compared to this gal..Right on all counts about Michael Jackson. Self-serving, attention whoring at its best.
Like I said, seen it all before. A long, long time ago. Can't understand all the fuss. Only difference: this time it's a young woman shucking off her Disney child star image in the best MJ tradition.
http://www.theonion.com/articles/let-me-explain-why-miley-cyrus-vma-performance-was,33632/Let Me Explain Why Miley Cyrus’ VMA Performance Was Our Top Story This Morning
By Meredith Artley, Managing Editor Of CNN.com
Over the years, CNN.com has become a news website that many people turn to for top-notch reporting. Every day it is visited by millions of people, all of whom rely on “The Worldwide Leader in News”—that’s our slogan—for the most crucial, up-to-date information on current events. So, you may ask, why was this morning’s top story, a spot usually given to the most important foreign or domestic news of the day, headlined “Miley Cyrus Did What???” and accompanied by the subhead “Twerks, stuns at VMAs”?
It’s a good question. And the answer is pretty simple. It was an attempt to get you to click on CNN.com so that we could drive up our web traffic, which in turn would allow us to increase our advertising revenue.
There was nothing, and I mean nothing, about that story that related to the important news of the day, the chronicling of significant human events, or the idea that journalism itself can be a force for positive change in the world. For Christ’s sake, there was an accompanying story with the headline “Miley’s Shocking Moves.” In fact, putting that story front and center was actually doing, if anything, a disservice to the public. And come to think of it, probably a disservice to the hundreds of thousands of people dying in Syria, those suffering from the current unrest in Egypt, or, hell, even people who just wanted to read about the 50th anniversary of Martin Luther King’s “I Have A Dream” speech.
But boy oh boy did it get us some web traffic...