Gotta love mitch under-cutting Butler here with irrelevant nonsense.
Looks like there is Graft in the Harris Family too.....
- Thread starter Butler1000
- Start date
It wasn't the talking heads in fox. It was real estate developers and market watchers on various business media that did.
Who else has been charged like this? Name them please.
Last edited:
Val, you really are having problems following the conversation again. I wish you the best as you try to navigate this.
Was it wrong when j Edgar hoover said he was going after al capone ? If capone ran for office would that have made it a political hit job ?
Name who was charged for lying on a gun application who has committed no other crimes - I dare you to. The Supreme Court said that those laws are unconstitutional and Florida doesn't even have a penalty for Hunters 'crime'. Furthermore red states never prosecute this 'crime'
Asking you for proof is "problems following the conversation"?
I like that one - just a shameless ink cloud of avoidance by you.
I don't think that's true.
I think there have been some lower court rulings and it hasn't made its way to the Supremes yet.
How about this guy: https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2018/aug/10/manafort-lied-on-loan-forms-witnesses-s/?print
I highly doubt thst Trump was the first guy ever charged for lying to get bank loans. Now show me who has been charged like hunter
Right.
That's not the provision Hunter was charged under.
People think the logic of the ruling should extend, but it isn't actually the same thing.
There are cases pending.
Sadly, I don't have access to the legal databases like NexusLexus. I'm sure there could be lawyers who do. And, just because it isn't in the media doesn't mean it doesn't happen. But, when you consider the scale of the fraud, and the person doing the fraud, it makes sense it would be covered in the paper.
But, I guess the question for you is this: Just because it might not be a widely prosecuted crime (partly because it might not be reported), doesn't mean an organization should get away with shady deals. Remember, the reason this came to light was through the testimony of Michael Cohn and the various jobs he did for Trump. It was not an investigation started as a fishing expedition.
So, you're proof is where you get James endorsing Harris? One where she doesn't even mention Trump by name.
Presumably, though, even without us having Lexus-Nexus, a reporter will have backed up the "this case is the only example of its type somewhere" with something other than a quote from a Trump surrogate.
But of course it does!
The system is so corrupt that targeting Trump just because there is evidence of a crime only shows you how they are persecuting him.
Remember, the system is so rigged that no one important ever faces consequences, so therefore it is unfair to put Trump on trial for a reason as tawdry as "he probably did it".
Yes.So, you're proof is where you get James endorsing Harris? One where she doesn't even mention Trump by name.
She is endorsing Harris now in 2024.
Therefore that is proof of what she was saying about getting Trump.
Because... reasons.
(The "reasons" being "Butler searched for something like "James focuses on Trump for campaign" or something and this is the first thing he found and never bothered to actually listen to it.")
I'll follow this thread. When they're available, please put details here.
What have the Repugs done so far?????? How about nominating a criminal who incited a riot to prevent the peaceful transfer of power after losing but being unable to admit it, so he lied that it was stolen. He also tried to have Georgia fabricate 12000 votes for him on a phone call. Those 2 things alone make him an enemy of democracy, but they still nominated him. That's what they've done.
Sounds legit....your candidate needs notes for the debate against a felon....
This is one if the funniest things you've said. Not in the good way by the way. I will clarify that now to save me have to explain it to you later.
