An uncivilized man probably would, yes.franky66 said:If he isnt sure then he should ask. That is the point. So, if he saw a man walking down the street and he suspected that man to be the man who mugged him the day before would he try to find out first or should be rain down blows(aka beat the shit out of) on the man and then ask questions later??????????
I didn't read your "reassurances" because, by that point, after your initial statement i knew what you meant and called you on it.You still hurt because you THINK I implied you were a racist? If someone tells you they werent calling you a racist and explains what they meant by their comments and you harp on and on about it even after all the reassurances, what does that mean? Does it mean that you have been found out and you are fighting for your false honour?
IM not saying it, my buddy told me what his friends do and he just got sick of it and it just motivated his ass to do something about his direction.Back Burner said:This statement alone gives you no credibility in my eyes about this issue. For you to say this show me what you think of an entire race of people. So then what do you say about the white people who cry about the same thing????
I'm talking about you're "sound familiar" comment. Like this is all black people do is just sit around crying about white people keeping them down. Guess what, I have many black friends that have made something of there life and the ones that haven't blame no one but themselves. (sound familiar??)CuteCob said:IM not saying it, my buddy told me what his friends do and he just got sick of it and it just motivated his ass to do something about his direction.
wtg BB.
Everyday, the majority of us motivate ourselves to go in the right direction. Only a small percentage become criminal. But if I was to listen to you, I would think it was the majority.CuteCob said:IM not saying it, my buddy told me what his friends do and he just got sick of it and it just motivated his ass to do something about his direction.
wtg BB.
I said it before, it's a class struggle/issue.RedHotPepper said:CuteCob,
As much as you would like to believe that race had nothing to do with the relief efforts .......................they most definitely did!!
It was also economical, but it was also race.
Called me on what? Dude, get over yourself when you are done stroking yourself. The only thing you tried calling me on was the spelling of analyse and we all know how THAT turned OUT!CuteCob said:I didn't read your "reassurances" because, by that point, after your initial statement i knew what you meant and called you on it.
Anything after that was fodda for me.
NO matter what you said, it didn't matter.
I just didn't dignify those replies with replies
Because I call an apple an apple, I get called a racist? lol.
I'm not trying to bait you. I'm just trying to understand why you can't see blacks as individuals.CuteCob said:after this im done, because, this really shouldn't be an issue and it's just circular.
People and animals are dying/suffering and this is not productive whatsoever.
enjoy people...didn't think i'd get suckered into another one of these lol.
So you're adding to the stigma by saying that your 1/2 black friend was a drug dealer and he admitted to his wrongful ways. And that he only gained redemption when he admitted that was no way to live a life? Am I correct in this?CuteCob said:because of the stigma attached to black people and how they are shady, etc, etc, and in the broader sense of people not taking responsibility for their own lives, rather than ho'humming through life blaming everyone else.
Any credibility that you may have had before has been swept away by the monumental idiocy of your theory.RedHotPepper said:My theory is that Bush wanted to regenerate NOLA. However, he did not want to reinvest money into it (ie . . Levees) when the majority of the population (black) was not making a finanacial contribution to the American economy. Matter of fact, NOLA is known as the welfare state. It is now reported that many of the people who did not evacuate were the people from the "projects". And to think, they didn't evacutate prisoners either. Funny how I haven't heard a follow up story to the prisoners. Hmmm, welfare recipients and violent convicts . . . . . . is there suppose to be a similarity here?
Anyways, back to my point. Bush foresaw this catastrophy as a way to wash away the old and bring in the new. And by leaving these survivors stranded for another couple days he would eliminate a few more. I believe that prevention and response would have been more timely if NOLA was a poor white city.
Bush knew the rest of the USA would identify and be more sympathetic and angry had Bush let this happen to white folks. He also knew that when the AfroAmerican community would cry racism, the rest of the USA would say "not the racism card again". Denouncing, what is obvious to the rest of the world.
Race was the factor allowing this to occur. Although the motivating factor was financial.
Interesting article for those with open minds.
http://tiadaily.com/php-bin/news/showArticle.php?id=1026
Was it? Please expound with another theory.RedHotPepper said:BTW, was the USA not developed on criminal activity . . . ie Rockerfellers, Slavery . . . .
By open do you mean full of holes? come on if bush wan't to get rid of the folks in NO why didn't he just inject them with AIDs and get them addicted to crack -- another interesting "theory". Jesus, is your life so full of hate and distrust that you actually believe the President of the United States DELIBERATELY wanted this to happen. Look there's no doubt he fucked up royally and that the mechanisms put in place to deal with a disaster of this magnitude were woefully underprepared but suggest that he wanted this to happen and withheld help on purpose as a means to achieve cheap urban renewal is just batty.RedHotPepper said:Ok Cob, here is why I say it is a race issue when it comes down to the bottom line.
My theory is that Bush wanted to regenerate NOLA. However, he did not want to reinvest money into it (ie . . Levees) when the majority of the population (black) was not making a finanacial contribution to the American economy. Matter of fact, NOLA is known as the welfare state. It is now reported that many of the people who did not evacuate were the people from the "projects". And to think, they didn't evacutate prisoners either. Funny how I haven't heard a follow up story to the prisoners. Hmmm, welfare recipients and violent convicts . . . . . . is there suppose to be a similarity here?
Anyways, back to my point. Bush foresaw this catastrophy as a way to wash away the old and bring in the new. And by leaving these survivors stranded for another couple days he would eliminate a few more. I believe that prevention and response would have been more timely if NOLA was a poor white city.
Bush knew the rest of the USA would identify and be more sympathetic and angry had Bush let this happen to white folks. He also knew that when the AfroAmerican community would cry racism, the rest of the USA would say "not the racism card again". Denouncing, what is obvious to the rest of the world.
Race was the factor allowing this to occur. Although the motivating factor was financial.
Interesting article for those with open minds.
http://tiadaily.com/php-bin/news/showArticle.php?id=1026