Read my previous post on the compensatory draft pick. If you google it many teams feel the draft pick is worth $10-15 mil.My guess is Bautista can get the 1 year deal on a lot of teams, and if that is the case why would he sign here.
Read my previous post on the compensatory draft pick. If you google it many teams feel the draft pick is worth $10-15 mil.My guess is Bautista can get the 1 year deal on a lot of teams, and if that is the case why would he sign here.
I read it. Don't necessarily agree with it. A draft pick is a draft pick, may or may not be a big leaguer. You can put any price you want on anything, does not mean you will get that price!Read my previous post on the compensatory draft pick. If you google it many teams feel the draft pick is worth $10-15 mil.
Doesn't really matter what you, I or anyone else thinks of the value of a 1st rounder. If you search, that is what the 30 GMs that control the market feel a draft pick is worth.I read it. Don't necessarily agree with it. A draft pick is a draft pick, may or may not be a big leaguer. You can put any price you want on anything, does not mean you will get that price!
Didn't you say that EE was worth and easily going to get 23 million or more per year? And that I didn't know what I was talking about.......Doesn't really matter what you, I or anyone else thinks of the value of a 1st rounder. If you search, that is what the 30 GMs that control the market feel a draft pick is worth.
That explains why JB EE and Trumbo
remain unsigned. Just shedding light on the situation.
LOLDidn't you say that EE was worth and easily going to get 23 million or more per year? And that I didn't know what I was talking about.......
Hmmm. The jury is still out but I feel a mea culpa coming my way.
What did JP Richiardi and protégé win in the decade plus in Toronto?I think we have it all wrong.
BTW, what did all these guys win in Cleveland?
So you would approve if JP reassembled his whole team somewhere else?What did JP Richiardi and protégé win in the decade plus in Toronto?
Not really, not a fan of his work nor a Mets fan.So you would approve if JP reassembled his whole team somewhere else?
I remember my estimate at about 18 million per. 3 plus an option. You said up to 5 at 23 million. And I didn't concede. You are unfortunately mistaking me for someone else.LOL
You still around?
Your memory fails you. DIdn't you admit that you were "mistaken" and gave in mid-season, when EE was leading the lead in RBI's?
Why don't you troll back to your estimate and mine (since you have so much time) and quote it here.
I distinctly recall that you conceded that you were "mistaken".I remember my estimate at about 18 million per. 3 plus an option. You said up to 5 at 23 million. And I didn't concede. You are unfortunately mistaking me for someone else.
Feel free to check yourself. My memory along with this prediction are far less fallible it appears.
Big difference between JP and AA.Not really, not a fan of his work nor a Mets fan.
You seem very upset with the direction the current Jays organizational has taken. Yet the prior 2 regimes the Jays had did not win anything either. Yet you are not critical of either JP or his hand picked successor Alex Anthoupolos. What gives?
So he won nothing? hmm that was a beef of yours towards current management.Big difference between JP and AA.
AA was bold, enthusiastic, willing to go all in and came within 2 games of the WS, .
Actually we had gone back and forth enough I figured I'd wait until the off season to see how things were going. And they aren't going to well.I distinctly recall that you conceded that you were "mistaken".
Since you want to dig up old shit, last spring I quizzed you that there is a certain baseball factor that MAY hold back EE's FA value. You declined to answer since you know dick all about baseball, and didn't want to expose your ignorance.
Now as I just explained here, the compensatory 1st draft pick holds down market values except for the longer contracts where $10mil is a rounding error.
BTW my last estimate was $21m per. Let's see where he lands.
Don't feel like debating all the points but the issuing of long term FA contracts seems to be a fading trend across MLB. IIRC, I read an article last week that said of the 20 or 30 FAs signed to that point, only 1 was for 5 years. I think the average was about 1.5 years. I don't see Shapeero bucking that trend.[1] There is potential for a long term (5 years +) FA contract for players; under Beeston/AA = non starter
Fair point, but I prefer the flexibility of a management team to consider it as opposed to telling the entire league (the only team at the time) they absolutely refuse to entertain the idea. Does not create goodwill with the players. The younger the league gets, there lies the possibility of top notch players hitting free agency under 30 . Under the prior regime none of these types would ever play in Toronto with their hard and fast rules. Rules that to use your words, won them nothing.Don't feel like debating all the points but the issuing of long term FA contracts seems to be a fading trend across MLB. IIRC, I read an article last week that said of the 20 or 30 FAs signed to that point, only 1 was for 5 years. I think the average was about 1.5 years. I don't see Shapeero bucking that trend.
The difference being I went down to $21 in April before the start of the season (cuz of the draft pick) while you went from 15 to 18 and now 20. you're changing your story now AFTER EE hit career highs on HR and RBI.. And if you down graded from 23 to 21 that's fine. I'll take a two million upgrade then from 18 to 20
Those 5 and the Giants are all paying the luxury taxCap is 189million but that also includes an extra amount for other player expenses (e.g. benefits).
Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox and Tigers are over. Cubs are close and may be over the 189 as well.