That is calling for genocide to you?Its in her testimony where she stated, as did the others, that "it depends on context". You can try to play a semantics game, but just like "from river to the sea" the message was clear.
Low bar.
That is calling for genocide to you?Its in her testimony where she stated, as did the others, that "it depends on context". You can try to play a semantics game, but just like "from river to the sea" the message was clear.
When you say its ok to call for it, depending on context, which is exactly what she did, I'd say she is right in there as the president of a major university. She either knew exactly what she was saying, or is completely unqualified to be the president.That is calling for genocide to you?
Low bar.
The 1977 election manifesto of the right-wing Israeli Likud party said: "Between the sea and the Jordan there will only be Israeli sovereignty."[15][16][17] Similar wording has also been used more recently by other Israeli politicians.[18]When you say its ok to call for it, depending on context, which is exactly what she did, I'd say she is right in there as the president of a major university. She either knew exactly what she was saying, or is completely unqualified to be the president.
And most people, judging from public reactions, feel the same.
She didn't say it was ok to call for it.When you say its ok to call for it, depending on context, which is exactly what she did, I'd say she is right in there as the president of a major university. She either knew exactly what she was saying, or is completely unqualified to be the president.
It's a PR shitstorm, sure.And most people, judging from public reactions, feel the same.
If its not against harassment policy, the "ok" it is the definition of it. It means the schools approves the message. Thats the way the student body wants it now.She didn't say it was ok to call for it.
She said it wouldn't necessarily be a violation of the bullying and harassment code of conduct.
She was, of course, completely correct.
That you believe this is the equivalent of calling for genocide is... well, very you.
It's a PR shitstorm, sure.
You always have believed that messaging and narrative dictate reality and are the more important thing, so I'm not surprised this is your position really.
You’ve already conceded she didn’t say it, windbag. There is absolutely no transcript of her saying It. There’s just people like you using “semantic“ arguments to say she did despite there being no record of her ever saying it.If its not against harassment policy, the "ok" it is the definition of it. It means the schools approves the message. Thats the way the student body wants it now.
Hey I wish it was different. But people like her created and perpetuate the culture. Now they have to lie t
In the shit bed
Nice to play that scenario in your head....which reports? the ones funded by Hamas? No wonder your posts reeks of stupidity, you only read the reports you want to hear....when will you ever learn?The IDF says that 85% of those they captured, who are all middle aged men, might have been Hamas.
So you think despite the reports saying 70% of the dead are women and children Israel is really killing mostly Hamas?
You do love the propaganda.
![]()
You mad? Hamas is getting destroyed, their western supporters are getting pounded with criticism....it's just a matter of time...i know you're crying yourself to sleep knowing Hamas is on their way to extinction....You’ve already conceded she didn’t say it, windbag. There is absolutely no transcript of her saying It. There’s just people like you using “semantic“ arguments to say she did despite there being no record of her ever saying it.
Stefanik is a follower of the Great Replacement Theory, part of the zionist Christian crowd. She wants a white christian state and thinks a Jewish ethnostate is part of the same program.She didn't say it was ok to call for it.
She said it wouldn't necessarily be a violation of the bullying and harassment code of conduct.
She was, of course, completely correct.
That you believe this is the equivalent of calling for genocide is... well, very you.
It's a PR shitstorm, sure.
You always have believed that messaging and narrative dictate reality and are the more important thing, so I'm not surprised this is your position really.
From the Canadian government:Nice to play that scenario in your head....which reports? the ones funded by Hamas? No wonder your posts reeks of stupidity, you only read the reports you want to hear....when will you ever learn?
Save that for your Grade 8 Creative Writing class.You mad? Hamas is getting destroyed, their western supporters are getting pounded with criticism....it's just a matter of time...i know you're crying yourself to sleep knowing Hamas is on their way to extinction....
Congrats on killing so many refugees. 75% of Gaza are refugees. 70% of the dead are women and children.You mad? Hamas is getting destroyed, their western supporters are getting pounded with criticism....it's just a matter of time...i know you're crying yourself to sleep knowing Hamas is on their way to extinction....
Franky / Klatuu after watching that speech...
How is the Biden administration at fault - even hypothetically - for something another country did?
No, rich.Franky / Klatuu after watching that speech...
www.palestinechronicle.com
Biden gives Israel $3.8 billion in weapons, personally vetoed how many ceasefire resolutions at the UN, while giving an extra half a billion in more bombs and tank shells. You can't get more responsible and participatory in genocide than personally flying over to shoot some babies.How is the Biden administration at fault - even hypothetically - for something another country did?
It's just another level of silly bullshit.





