You want to criticize the party that is wrong without identifying the cause?But there is no need to identify a cause. The cause is apparent that there is a conflict for the last 7+ decades. The reaction should be criticism of Hamas for this attack.
I would say the same thing if Israel did something. No reason to dive into causes. We know the causes already. Nothing new. We can just criticize the party that is wrong.
Then you'll end up criticizing the wrong party.
Oh right, you don't identify the occupation as a possible cause.
No, its not saying they are all the same, they all believe they are racially better and then apply that belief much, much differently.Yes but by saying they are all based on racial supremacy, you are saying they are the same. I am interpreting you correctly. I am disagreeing with that assertion here, as I did over there in that thread. Zionism is not a racial supremacist ideology like Nazism. Therefore they are not the same. You cannot equate them and put them on similar footing. So in the presence of proof, again, why are you lying? What is with you and lying anyway? That is not an honourable way to conduct a discussion.
Its like arguing that forms of booze are the same as they are ways of distilling drinkable alcohol.
I can equate the same racial supremacy base ideology then differentiate how they interpret and implement that ideology.
You're just arguing because you back one form of racial supremacy.