Is the Kessel trade the greatest fleecing in NHL history?

d_jedi

New member
Sep 5, 2005
8,765
1
0
The Leafs clearly paid too much to get Kessel (picks who turned into Tyler Seguin, Dougie Hamilton and Jared Knight) and got too little in return when they traded him away (Kasperi Kapanen, Scott Harrington, plus spare parts).

Kessel is a great goal scorer, but he was not a really great fit for this team. The Leafs never surrounded him with a supporting cast (namely, a number one centre) to maximize his talents. And the Toronto media basically ran him out of town because, oh no, he's a goal scorer but not a team leader or really friendly with the press. As if putting pucks in the net isn't enough. (One good comparison I read.. Kessel is like Patrick Kane, but we wanted him to be Jonathan Toews). On a line with Crosby or Malkin, Kessel will do very, very well.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,394
9,969
113
Toronto
Their old GM is quickly putting together a solid base in Edmonton.
Pretty shrewd move getting McDavid.

Aside from that, it is all conjecture.
 

maurice93

Well-known member
Mar 29, 2006
5,927
904
113
Pleeeeeease read the above quote from Manji, it really summons up your hockey knowledge
So what is wrong with the above post?

It was proven this summer that Kessel ha slightly less value then Hamilton on the trade market. And it's no debate that Seguin is worth more today.

So please tell me what was wrong.

As for my original comment on this thread. I am sure that was due to Ironhead three word responses to my reasoned arguments which he never countered. Of course it was not the greatest fleecing. But it was bad.
 

maurice93

Well-known member
Mar 29, 2006
5,927
904
113
Their old GM is quickly putting together a solid base in Edmonton.
That same GM managed to screw up a gift in Seguin.

Although I have heard rumours that both the Hamilton and Seguin move were drive by Beegeron and chars whining to Neely because they did not like them. So who knows maybe it's more a Neely thing.
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,716
2,612
113
The Leafs clearly paid too much to get Kessel (picks who turned into Tyler Seguin, Dougie Hamilton and Jared Knight) and got too little in return when they traded him away (Kasperi Kapanen, Scott Harrington, plus spare parts).

Kessel is a great goal scorer, but he was not a really great fit for this team. The Leafs never surrounded him with a supporting cast (namely, a number one centre) to maximize his talents. And the Toronto media basically ran him out of town because, oh no, he's a goal scorer but not a team leader or really friendly with the press. As if putting pucks in the net isn't enough. (One good comparison I read.. Kessel is like Patrick Kane, but we wanted him to be Jonathan Toews). On a line with Crosby or Malkin, Kessel will do very, very well.
I would say it had more to do with his lack of conditioning. Was it last summer he didn't even skate once? I doubt he hit the gym either. You could see how exhausted he was after every shift. Half the time just coasting back to the bench on a change causing an odd man rush the other way. He was a -79 in the 6 years in Toronto. That's why media and fans turned against him, wasted potential.
 

elmo

Registered User
Oct 23, 2002
4,722
4
0
here and there
The Leafs clearly paid too much to get Kessel (picks who turned into Tyler Seguin, Dougie Hamilton and Jared Knight) and got too little in return when they traded him away (Kasperi Kapanen, Scott Harrington, plus spare parts).

Kessel is a great goal scorer, but he was not a really great fit for this team. The Leafs never surrounded him with a supporting cast (namely, a number one centre) to maximize his talents. And the Toronto media basically ran him out of town because, oh no, he's a goal scorer but not a team leader or really friendly with the press. As if putting pucks in the net isn't enough. (One good comparison I read.. Kessel is like Patrick Kane, but we wanted him to be Jonathan Toews). On a line with Crosby or Malkin, Kessel will do very, very well.
Kessel was never a great goal scorer. He is a one way player who shows signs of brilliance from time to time, he never put that many pucks in the net.
 

elmo

Registered User
Oct 23, 2002
4,722
4
0
here and there
Phil Kessel is the second highest scoring winger over the last four years and the fourth highest goal scorer during that period. He led the Leafs in points in each of his 6 seasons with the team and led in goals 5 of those 6 seasons. (And he achieved all of this with TYLER BOZAK as his centre!)

http://www.hockey-reference.com/pla...c4comp=gt&c4val=&threshhold=5&order_by=points
I don't think leading in scoring and points on a team that didn't make playoffs is a huge accomplishment. He was also a -79 over that timeframe...hardly a superstar.
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
27,224
7,859
113
Room 112
I don't think leading in scoring and points on a team that didn't make playoffs is a huge accomplishment. He was also a -79 over that timeframe...hardly a superstar.
That's not the point. You stated he wasn't that great a goal scorer and rerun disproved you with facts. Yes Kessel had his flaws, he's certainly not a two way player, but pure goal scorers like he are a pretty rare breed in today's NHL. We got fleeced by Pittsburgh on this deal.
 

elmo

Registered User
Oct 23, 2002
4,722
4
0
here and there
That's not the point. You stated he wasn't that great a goal scorer and rerun disproved you with facts. Yes Kessel had his flaws, he's certainly not a two way player, but pure goal scorers like he are a pretty rare breed in today's NHL. We got fleeced by Pittsburgh on this deal.
He didn't disprove anything. Goal scorers are not limited to wingers. 25 goals last year does not make him a great goal scorer. Ovechkin had 53...more than double. Yes, you could say pittsburg fleeced Toronto, however you could also look at it that toronto got rid of a very expensive cancer in the room that was underachieving on the ice and made the best deal they could.
 

elmo

Registered User
Oct 23, 2002
4,722
4
0
here and there
If the players around Kessel where 'exploding' with effort and energy every night, I could then understand some finger pointing. But how do you feel Kessel underachieved when he led the team for so many years? Why do you consider the guy a 'cancer'?
His work ethic could be questioned, but he did produce, and more important he didn't miss game or get hurt all the time.

I have to protest that this was a team collapse once RC was fired. Komarov was nothing like he used to be, and Kadri, JVR, Bozak, were all phantoms.

They would be better to have kept him for the remainder of the contract or at least tested a deal when the club has resumed so stability.
Starting this coming year with the roster they have is not encouraging.
OK I'll grant you this...he was the best of the worst. Not exactly a game changer. Yes there was a cast of lacklustre performers and he was one of them. Agreed that this year's roster isn't too encouraging but after the past 10 or so years...can they be worse? If they have to take a step back for two forward that seems like a good deal.

PS - I'm a habs fan
PSS - you have a spectacular ass
 

Lv Wmn

Well-known member
Sep 16, 2009
400
266
63
If the players around Kessel where 'exploding' with effort and energy every night, I could then understand some finger pointing. But how do you feel Kessel underachieved when he led the team for so many years? Why do you consider the guy a 'cancer'?
His work ethic could be questioned, but he did produce, and more important he didn't miss game or get hurt all the time.

I have to protest that this was a team collapse once RC was fired. Komarov was nothing like he used to be, and Kadri, JVR, Bozak, were all phantoms.

They would be better to have kept him for the remainder of the contract or at least tested a deal when the club has resumed so stability.
Starting this coming year with the roster they have is not encouraging.
Lots of good points.

I suspect next year will be different, nobody that is not in shape and giving 100% effort will play. Babcock has total control on the ice and will not hesitate to bench or send guys (anyone) to the press box.

It might be a tough year to watch but I do not expect to see the same lack of effort we saw last year.

I am OK with losing, not OK with guys not even looking like they give a fuck about playing.

A buddy of mine is the father to one of the Leafs and he tells me that Babcock and Lou have both contacted his son more so far this summer than he EVER heard from anyone over the past few seasons.

Message seemed pretty clear, be in shape, and play hard.
 

elmo

Registered User
Oct 23, 2002
4,722
4
0
here and there
'Best of the worst' is an excellent way of putting it..lol
I also like your optimism, and agree it couldn't be worse. So, a Habs fan huh? That was a nice compliment you know. Hows about you buy me a coffee sometime, and tell me what a post season feels like?
HA HA, how bout you become a Habs fan and live the experience?
 

elmo

Registered User
Oct 23, 2002
4,722
4
0
here and there
I'd say you're tempting me with the 'Dark Side', but sometimes wonder if its Leaf Nation who are the real Evil Empire :confused:
We used to consider the Leafs to be the Evil Empire...I honestly have to admire Leaf Nation...it takes a special kind of person to put up with what you folks have for so long. You're either really patient or nuts, maybe a bit of both.
 

SkyRider

Banned
Mar 31, 2009
17,572
2
0
How many guys are happy or pissec Phil is in the Stanley Cup Finals ? For me I am kind of happy for the guy ..
Either Kessel or Reimer will be on a Stanley Cup winning team. Good for them. I felt both (same with Phaneurf) were unfairly treated in Toronto.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts