is rehabilitation possible? or death penalty?

ottawa_cuck

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2020
854
320
63

Attachments

jalimon

Well-known member
Jan 10, 2016
7,544
7,689
113
What does that accomplish? This animal would still have killed his baby momma with a different tool.

You have a fetish for banning things? Ban criminals from society

To have a better society you ban guns and you provide free healthcare, free education, sick leaves, parental leaves and of course you let woman free to do an abortion.

You say capitalist without going extreme capitalism which create the absolute crazy inequalities the US currently has.
 

versitile1

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2013
3,448
1,527
113

versitile1

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2013
3,448
1,527
113
I do 💯

She’s a feral animal. I’ll volunteer to do it myself.
Nice to know you think people are guilty until proven innocent, except that's not how civilized society works.

Maybe you can petition the government here to bring back capital punishment but until then, you should go to the closest border and tell the US border patrol there that you want to volunteer to be an executioner. Should be a fun time for you.

I also wonder if you were actually truthful on your PAL application because "needing guns for protection" isn't a valid reason in Canada.
 

versitile1

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2013
3,448
1,527
113
you’re making shit up
Nope, you think the possibility of being a victim is a valid reason to own a gun in Canada. It is not.

How many home invasions per year? 100?

That’s 100 people every year who have a valid reason to buy a gun.



How many of their family members will do the same? Neighbors?



As long as crime continues, new gun owners are created.





So you wanna stop gun sales?

then stop releasing the criminals

lock them up ⛓
 

versitile1

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2013
3,448
1,527
113
you’re talking out of your ass

why don’t you inform yourself before commenting?


Not sure what the PAL application form has to do with anything.

Thankfully things are the way they are. And the way things are now is that if someone comes into my house, tonight, I have the choice of 4 firearms. I can also choose a pellet gun on this invader’s ass if I want to be funny.



Liberals dont have any solution to the criminal problem. They say “let the thief get away, insurance will pay”. No, that means I’m paying criminals to steal my shit.



Punish these scumbags. Severely. Gulags.
I get it. You're scared of the boogeyman so you've armed yourself.
 

ottawa_cuck

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2020
854
320
63
I also wonder if you were actually truthful on your PAL application because "needing guns for protection" isn't a valid reason in Canada.
Nope, you think the possibility of being a victim is a valid reason to own a gun in Canada. It is not.
Not sure what the PAL application form has to do with anything.
Show me the part in the application where it asks for me for a valid reason to own a gun.
 

versitile1

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2013
3,448
1,527
113
Show me the part in the application where it asks for me for a valid reason to own a gun.
Do you think that upon completion of the application you linked, that you're eligible to possess firearms, or that there may be additional questions to answer?
 

ottawa_cuck

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2020
854
320
63
Do you think that upon completion of the application you linked, that you're eligible to possess firearms, or that there may be additional questions to answer?
There are none. Another clueless liberal accusing others of mouthing off
 

Mable

Active member
Sep 20, 2004
1,378
11
38
I should be dead by now.

I have four guns at home. My parents had guns. My Uncles were gun fanatics. But I guess it’s like climate change, death is just around the corner unless the government acts now & bans my guns.

I’m sorry you don’t understand that guns are bad only in the hands of CRIMINALS & IDIOTS.
Agree with Ottawa_cuck; and Frank clearly has not read the book/study by John R. Lott "More Guns, Less Crime" which is a 20 year study of gun crime in the U.S. comparing said crime in jurisdictions with heavy gun restrictions/gun free zones compared to those with fewer restrictions. Interesting.
 

versitile1

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2013
3,448
1,527
113
There are none. Another clueless liberal accusing others of mouthing off
Are you saying no one from the RCMP CFO office contacted you with further questions after you sent in the initial application?

Another wannabe murican rightie resorting to insults.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: ottawa_cuck

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,775
24,053
113
Agree with Ottawa_cuck; and Frank clearly has not read the book/study by John R. Lott "More Guns, Less Crime" which is a 20 year study of gun crime in the U.S. comparing said crime in jurisdictions with heavy gun restrictions/gun free zones compared to those with fewer restrictions. Interesting.
Lott is disputed.
NRC Report[edit]
Partially in response to Lott's book, a sixteen-member panel of the United States National Research Council was convened to address the issue of whether right-to-carry laws influenced crime rate. They also looked at many other gun control measures, including the soon-to-expire 1994 Assault Weapon Ban, gun buy-backs, and bans on handgun possession or carry. In 2004 they issued the report "Firearms and Violence: A Critical Review" which examined Lott's statistical methods in detail, including computation of the statistical uncertainties involved, and wrote

The US is fucked in that the federal government is barred from gather gun crime data by rules pushed by the NRA.
Even so, independent sources have checked the numbers and one basic stat comes out.
States with fewer guns have fewer gun deaths,

 
  • Like
Reactions: y2kmark

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
34,332
65,229
113
Agree with Ottawa_cuck; and Frank clearly has not read the book/study by John R. Lott "More Guns, Less Crime" which is a 20 year study of gun crime in the U.S. comparing said crime in jurisdictions with heavy gun restrictions/gun free zones compared to those with fewer restrictions. Interesting.
AHAHAHAHAHAH

OMG - I haven't seen someone try to use "Mary Rosh" as a serious argument in years.
That's hilarious.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,775
24,053
113
AHAHAHAHAHAH

OMG - I haven't seen someone try to use "Mary Rosh" as a serious argument in years.
That's hilarious.
I hadn't heard this one, Lott totally imploded as well.
'My computer crashed and I lost all my research'

Amazing!
 
Toronto Escorts