They were offered land of much greater territory than Gaza and the West Bank. They would die to have that much land right now.
Iranian woman paralysed after being shot over hijab
- Thread starter Vinson
- Start date
The ICJ just gave Palestine back.
Israel just has to stop the illegal occupation, apartheid and genocide then hand back Palestine.
There is no genocide.
There is no apartheid.
There is and has never been a sovereign state of Palestine.
Let us know when you wish to discuss matters in the here and now.
Your intense hatred of Jews is curdling the blood that's perfusing your cranial brain cells. You are losing your mind.
The exact same as Israel was offered. Actually, the Arabs were offered more than what Israel was offered. They would die to have that amount of land offered right now.
You still can't say 'Palestinian', can you?
Such a dead giveaway.
Turkey's Erdoğan threatens to intervene in Israel
( Globalvoices.org ) - A verbal spat between Turkey and Israel highlighted the country's complicated relationship with Israel and Palestine and drew attention to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's penchant for doublespeak. During a speech in the province of Rize on July 28, Erdoğan said...
www.juancole.com
I use Palestinian all the time, but not when referring to 1948 and prior.
But are you somehow saying that Palestinians are not Arabs? Is it a problem using the word "Arab"? FYI, all Palestinians are Arab, but not all Arabs are Palestinian. By using "Arab" I am making sure that I am not mislabelling anyone. I am careful with the words I choose and how I use them.
That way I don't get into trouble by, for example, calling Gazans "lesser humans" or that "hiring Filipino nurses is bad for Ontario health care". One's choice of words makes a difference, Geno.
ICJ ruled otherwise. Facts are something you need to accept. Your intense hatred of anyone not Jewish (no surprise, Ziontology is a supremacist ideology) is curdling the blood perfusing your brain cells (left out the “crainial “….a little redundant). You lost your mind, your humanity and your integrity when you embraced Ziontology.
Last edited:
You sound like MAGA talking about Harris' race, Shazi.
Racial supremacists are all the same.
Refugees only because Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon refuse to follow the UN Convention on refugees.
You'll claim that's all Israel's fault but would you be okay if Canada refused to give refugees any status or support? Yours is actually a horrible argument because the war that caused 750,000 Palestinian refugees and 1,000,000 Arab Jewish refugees was launched by Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria.
You've made your rationale quite clear.
Now do you want to explain why instead of criticizing Iran's murder of women for showing hair, you complain that people dare talk about it?
And again dismissing Palestinian will and Palestinian governance.
1) Palestinians overwhelmingly don't want to be Israeli and have no interest in voting there.
2) Under Oslo, Palestinians are supposed to be voting for their leaders, something both Hamas and the PA did away with.
p.s. There's a couple million permanent residents in Canada without the right to vote since they aren't citizens (but you would never spend time fighting for the rights of people here).
No matter how many times you've been shown the actual documents, you still continue to push this fantasy. To quote your bot buddy, "Moldy Cult Fiction. Never taught in academic institutions."
p.s. Care to explain why the racist nationalism from Palestinian leaders in the pre-British and early British era explicitly targeted indigenous Jews?
No, basketcase, they are refugees because of the occupation of Palestine and the ethnic cleansing of Palestine.
Not because of Jordan or Syria.
The war after partition was started by zionist terrorists like Irgun and Haganah, not by the surrounding states.
Israel has likely killed 186,000 Palestinians according to the Lancet.
That's way more than Iran.
That's way more than Hamas.
Lets talk about those killing the most civilians, the one that is most terrorist like.
Israel.
The ridiculously flawed study in the opinion section of the Lancet was only intended to estimate how many people died. It says absolutely nothing about who was responsible for those deaths. You invented that. It's another lie.
Frank presented something as "Lancet says" It's been shown to him multiple times that it was in the correspondence section and was provided with both the lancet link and cut and paste where they explain that this section is often not peer reviewed and is just letters they print, much like letters to the editor and not a reflection on their policy. All sorts of letters get printed in Newspaper from all sorts of positions, this is none differenent.
Even though he has been told this multiple times, it seems that he persists in flat out lying about this, based on Shacks responses to him, I try to avoid Frankfooters posts because they are so filled with lies bullshit and hate mongering.
Now perhaps you don't have a problem with flat out lies but normal healthy people do.
But hey, continue on with that 2 minutes of hate.
