International Holocaust Remembrance Day

[Frankfooter]

Do you have any honour, shack?
Lets check.

Now that your sidekick has backed me up, its time for you to keep your word and discuss your own views.
Why do you keep supporting apartheid?
Why do you refuse to call out Israel when they use snipers on children?

Israel's apartheid against Palestinians

Palestinians are systematically subjected to home demolitions and forced evictions, and live in constant fear of losing their homes. For more than 73 years, Israel has been forcibly displacing entire Palestinian communities. Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians’ homes have been demolished...

www.amnesty.org

 

[shack]

Do you have any honour, shack?

You are the last person to be talking about honour. More and more people join this discussion to say how little you have. All you have on your side is Gilligan.

Still waiting for your post(s) condemning Pali violence, prior to my challenge, or an admission that you never had done so.

You just wasted more time and space.

 

[Frankfooter]

You are the last person to be talking about honour. More and more people join this discussion to say how little you have. All you have on your side is Gilligan.

Still waiting for your post(s) condemning Pali violence, prior to my challenge, or an admission that you never had done so.

You just wasted more time and space.

You talk about honour while using an insult on another member and a racist term for Palestinians, a word you won't say.
Your terms were met so you changed them.
You accused me of lying but refuse to back it up.
Your sidekick says you're wrong.
You're racist quotes have been repeatedly posted here.

Honour?

I argue for equality, the end of violence and anti-racism.
That's honour.

 

[shack]

You talk about honour while using an insult on another member and a racist term for Palestinians, a word you won't say.
Your terms were met so you changed them.
You accused me of lying but refuse to back it up.
Your sidekick says you're wrong.
You're racist quotes have been repeatedly posted here.

Honour?

I argue for equality, the end of violence and anti-racism.
That's honour.

This discussion began when I said that you'd never made a post condemning and act of Pali violence as terrorism. All you did was subsequently make a new post. As such, my statement is 100% correct. At the point in time I made challenge, you had no posts to counter my claim.

Still waiting for your post(s) condemning Pali violence, prior to my challenge, or an admission that you never had done so.

You just wasted more time and space.

 

[Frankfooter]

Still waiting for your post(s) condemning Pali violence, prior to my challenge, or an admission that you never had done so.

You just wasted more time and space.

I've done so repeatedly in the past.
Honour your own words.

If you're accusing me of lying then it's up to you to prove it.

You posted the following in 2018.
Have you ever once found a condemnation of violence by Palestinians by anyone on this board you accepted?

Like I said, you have no posts praising Israel.

 

[shack]

I've done so repeatedly in the past.

So then, show us those threads from the past. The one you posted AFTER my challenge is not the past.

If you had some, you'd shove them down my throat. But you haven't which means that there are none.

That's what I keep saying and Gilligan says that I'm up to about 53. And I've proved my point 53 times. But you keep pretending otherwise so I have to keep slapping you down.

SHOW US A POST OF YOUR'S PRIOR TO MY CHALLENGE, CONDEMNING A PARTICULAR ACT OF VIOLENCE BY THE PALIS AGAINST ISRAEL AS AN ACT OF TERRORISM.

I will not be distracted by your lame attempts at changing the topic, which is nothing more or less than your posting history. Let's stay on topic.

After that, maybe then we can talk about me. But not before.

 

[Klatuu]

Oh shucks shack….why do you think basketcase corroborates what Frankfooter said? He’s no fan of Frankfooter.

 

[NotADcotor]

While we are at it, could someone give me some insight into the evolution of the market economy in the southern colonies.

 

[Frankfooter]

So then, show us those threads from the past. The one you posted AFTER my challenge is not the past.

If you had some, you'd shove them down my throat. But you haven't which means that there are none.

That's what I keep saying and Gilligan says that I'm up to about 53. And I've proved my point 53 times. But you keep pretending otherwise so I have to keep slapping you down.

SHOW US A POST OF YOUR'S PRIOR TO MY CHALLENGE, CONDEMNING A PARTICULAR ACT OF VIOLENCE BY THE PALIS AGAINST ISRAEL AS AN ACT OF TERRORISM.

I will not be distracted by your lame attempts at changing the topic, which is nothing more or less than your posting history. Let's stay on topic.

After that, maybe then we can talk about me. But not before.

Why shack?

Two reasons:
1) You won't accept a link as proven with my original reply to your 'demand'. Feel free to find your original demand and I'll find the post where you admitted that you only 'inferred' what you now claim.
2) This is your lie about me that you need to prove, not me. Basketcase and me have both stated that I've done exactly what you claim I haven't done so its up to you to prove otherwise.
Not me.

If you're accusing me of lying then it's up to you to prove it.

You're accusing me of lying.
Its up to you to prove it.
If you have any honour.

 

[shack]

Why shack?

Two reasons:
1) You won't accept a link as proven with my original reply to your 'demand'. Feel free to find your original demand and I'll find the post where you admitted that you only 'inferred' what you now claim.
2) This is your lie about me that you need to prove, not me. Basketcase and me have both stated that I've done exactly what you claim I haven't done so its up to you to prove otherwise.
Not me.

You're accusing me of lying.
Its up to you to prove it.
If you have any honour.

This discussion began when I said that you'd never made a post condemning an act of Pali violence as terrorism. All you did was subsequently make a new post. As such, my statement is 100% correct. At the point in time I made my challenge, you had no posts to counter my claim.

Still waiting for your post(s) condemning Pali violence, prior to my challenge, or an admission that you never had done so.

Let's clear this up before we move on. I explained clearly why your post after my challenge is meaningless, other than to prove that my assertion was correct. If you had any posts of what I'd asked for, you'd have posted them to shut me up.

You just wasted more time and space.

 

[Klatuu]

This discussion began when I said that you'd never made a post condemning an act of Pali violence as terrorism. All you did was subsequently make a new post. As such, my statement is 100% correct. At the point in time I made my challenge, you had no posts to counter my claim.

Still waiting for your post(s) condemning Pali violence, prior to my challenge, or an admission that you never had done so.

Let's clear this up before we move on. I explained clearly why your post after my challenge is meaningless, other than to prove that my assertion was correct. If you had any posts of what I'd asked for, you'd have posted them to shut me up.

You just wasted more time and space.

Oh shucks shack….why do you think basketcase corroborates what Frankfooter said? He’s no fan of Frankfooter.

Not too slick shack…..now your adding playing dumb to your Darwin Award strategy of refusing to the same questions you demand of others.

You are approaching the trifecta of stupidity.

And interestingly, I’ve found some other exchanges with users where you refuse to stand by what you said and try to change the goalposts.

 

[shack]

Not too slick shack…..now your adding playing dumb to your Darwin Award strategy of refusing to the same questions you demand of others.

More idiocy from you. Can't you read?

I want my initial question to be properly answered first and honestly. He posted something after I'd challenged him which is inappropriate since I'd stated that he HAD never posted blah, blah, blah not that he WILL never post blah, blah blah. So now I'm right for the 54th time.

I said that then maybe we can move on to other topics. Weren't you supposed help him find one of those quotes

I made this all clear numerous times. And you accuse me of playing dumb? Hahaha

 

[Frankfooter]

This discussion began when I said that you'd never made a post condemning an act of Pali violence as terrorism. All you did was subsequently make a new post.

You said I hadn't made a post.
I made a post showing you wrong.
Then you changed the terms.

I want my initial question to be properly answered first and honestly.

Fine, I'll answer it as soon as you post the original question with a working link.

Until then, this part of the 'discussion' is done.
Time for you to answer why you repeatedly post racist comments, defend apartheid, refuse to call out Israeli violence like using snipers on children and why you've been trying the same tactics here since 2015.

Why do you defend apartheid?

Israel's apartheid against Palestinians

Palestinians are systematically subjected to home demolitions and forced evictions, and live in constant fear of losing their homes. For more than 73 years, Israel has been forcibly displacing entire Palestinian communities. Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians’ homes have been demolished...

www.amnesty.org

 

[Klatuu]

More idiocy from you. Can't you read?

I want my initial question to be properly answered first and honestly. He posted something after I'd challenged him which is inappropriate since I'd stated that he HAD never posted blah, blah, blah not that he WILL never post blah, blah blah. So now I'm right for the 54th time.

I said that then maybe we can move on to other topics. Weren't you supposed help him find one of those quotes

I made this all clear numerous times. And you accuse me of playing dumb? Hahaha

Wonderful. Now let’s test if you are playing dumb or relying on your Darwin Award winning strategy of not answering the same questions you demand of others.

Simply answer this:

Oh shucks shack….why do you think basketcase corroborates what Frankfooter said? He’s no fan of Frankfooter.

 

[shack]

You said I hadn't made a post.
I made a post showing you wrong.
Then you changed the terms.

I've explained a dozen times why that post is invalid.

Fine, I'll answer it as soon as you post the original question with a working link.

I already asked it, which is why you replied at the time.

Until then, this part of the 'discussion' is done.

I can see why you'd like to move on. You are cornered because you have no previous posts condemning any particular Pali violence. You may make the occasional grand statement of condemning violence on either side, but any time a particular event is reported, you never condemn it.

My position has been consistent. My point was not about politics or policies or the history of the region or discrimination etc.

My point focussed on YOUR POSTING HISTORY, nothing else. So asking me about all the other stuff is off topic and diversionary. I made a claim about you and you have not been able to produce a single post that proves I was wrong. It's actually a simple task to shut me up for such a super smart guy with advanced tech skills.

 

[Frankfooter]

I've explained a dozen times why that post is invalid.

I already asked it, which is why you replied at the time.

I can see why you'd like to move on. You are cornered because you have no previous posts condemning any particular Pali violence. You may make the occasional grand statement of condemning violence on either side, but any time a particular event is reported, you never condemn it.

My position has been consistent. My point was not about politics or policies or the history of the region or discrimination etc.

My point focussed on YOUR POSTING HISTORY, nothing else. So asking me about all the other stuff is off topic and diversionary. I made a claim about you and you have not been able to produce a single post that proves I was wrong. It's actually a simple task to shut me up for such a super smart guy with advanced tech skills.

Post the original question and my reply, shack.
I challenge you.

I want my initial question to be properly answered first and honestly.

Do it.
Are you afraid of being exposed as a bullshitter or totally unable to search the post and post a reply with a link?
Do it.

 

[Frankfooter]

You may make the occasional grand statement of condemning violence on either side, but any time a particular event is reported, you never condemn it.

This is an easily disprove lie, shack.
Click here for proof.

I'd also like to point out that I've given you about 50 chances to condemn Israeli apartheid and the intentional, state ordered, use of snipers on children protesting for human rights.
You have refused to condemn any act by Israel repeatedly on this board, which makes you a total hypocrite with a history of racist posts in defence of Israeli apartheid.

Tell me why basketcase's description doesn't apply to you?

Only racist scum think self defence includes attacking civilians who were not engaged in acts of violence.

 

[basketcase]

Tell us how you think this is good and that I should cheer for it the way you and shack do.
...

Wow, your attempts to deflect from your overt anti-semitism in a thread about the Holocaust are as usual pathetic. You have a long history of justification of terrorism and promotion of anti-semitic conspiracy theories and keep trying to claim Jews are valid targets for criticism about Israel.

You also have a clear elitist racist view of Arabs in your inability to hold them accountable for their choices and demanding they do your will despite clearly hating the idea.

 

[basketcase]

Even basketcase says you're bullshitting.
...

Basketcase says every few years you are forced to admit that there are Palestinians who commit terrorism but then go on to try and blame Jews for it.

Then you go right back to claiming terror attacks from Palestinians are somehow self defence, completely contradicting the rights groups you pretend to support.

The most pathetic part is that at no time do your rare admissions of problems among Palestinian leadership make you even briefly consider that Palestinian leadership contribute to the lack of peace and human rights.

I have repeatedly condemned terrorism from extremist Israeli settlers and have condemned extremists in Israeli leadership positions. You on the other hand are 100% motivated only by demonizing Israel. You have proven that you have no interest in peace and no interest in advancing thr conditions or the Palestinian people. Your only motivation is hatred of Jews being in the Middle East and are willing to promote destruction, ethnic cleansing, the most vile authoritarian governments simply to further your own obsessive hatred.

 

[Frankfooter]

Wow, your attempts to deflect from your overt anti-semitism in a thread about the Holocaust are as usual pathetic. You have a long history of justification of terrorism and promotion of anti-semitic conspiracy theories and keep trying to claim Jews are valid targets for criticism about Israel.

You also have a clear elitist racist view of Arabs in your inability to hold them accountable for their choices and demanding they do your will despite clearly hating the idea.

No, you are lying your face off.
I argue for equal rights, the end of apartheid and application of international law.
That's all.

I challenge you to prove your claims, conspiracy theories and your claim about targeting civilians.
Prove it.