Its really sad when all you can do is deny the ruling and the words.
Denying without anything to back your denial.
Sad.
How do you prevent:
(a) killing members of the group;
without a ceasefire?
Last edited:
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE: LATEST
- Thread starter niniveh
- Start date
Denying without anything to back your denial.
Sad.
How do you prevent:
(a) killing members of the group;
without a ceasefire?
Sad Shack……are you actually saying the Holocaust is no longer relevant to any discussion? lol
Two words that will never be synonymous: Zionism and TruthI wouldn't be surprised if he says that considering even Netanyahu seems to consider Hitler not responsible for the holocaust, and was instead pushing that Palestinians were responsible for the holocaust. Infact after he made those comments, Germany had to come back and release a statement saying: "Hey! We were responsible for the holocaust, not the Palestinians!!"
What's sad is you're the one who can't accept the ruling....ICJ already said hamas should release all hostages...yet you are saying, "ceasefire first"... so hamas shouldn't follow the ICJ ruling? How convenient....typical terrorist sympathizer....
So you are arguing that only Hamas has to abide by the ruling and that Israel doesn't have to 'prevent killing' 'prevent injuring' and 'allow all aid'?
Why would anyone be so daft as to try that line?
Now you change your tune to suit your narrative.
Sorry, but 75 years is ancient history. No need to bring it up anymore.
Oct. 7 is very recent and the fallout from Oct. 7 not only initiated Israel's current incursion into Gaza but it is still ongoing. As well, Israel's aggression toward Gaza increased exponentially immediately following Oct. 7. So the war and the "occupation" are very different situations.
The war and Oct. 7 are inextricably linked. They cannot be separated. You can't pick one 75 year old factor, like the occupation, especially when the Pali grievances are multifactorial. As such it is totally logical and correct to dismiss the occupation as anything approaching relevant. You should stop talking about that old excuse. That's all it is, an excuse to justify racist, anti-Semitic violence against Jews. Any excuse is good enough to attack Jews.
The occupation is old and low hanging fruit.
Its not ancient history.
The occupation started 75 years ago and continues today with Israel still trying to take and colonize more of Palestine.
Its all the same, except now the gloves are off and we see the true face of zionism.
Genocide.
His argument also leads to the irrefutable conclusion that Israel need not follow ICJ rulings. He can't have it both ways.
frank is now telling us: Israel can ignore ICJ sanctions.
On a relative basis, 75 years vs. a little over 100 days is very ancient. Even Kaut tells is it is irrelevant.
What an idiotic statement.
Israel will face trial for genocide for ignoring the ICJ ruling.
What charges do you think Hamas will face?
The occupation continues today, shack, its not ancient history.
Its the present.
Not in the slightest. Watch.
1)Hamas was ordered by the ICJ to immediately return the hostages.
2)Hamas has refused to do so.
3)You have not criticized them for ignoring the ICJ.
4)You are cool with Hamas not complying.
Ergo: It's OK with you if Israel ignores ICJ directives as well.
That is a perfect flow of facts resulting in a completely apropos conclusion.
You are incapable of providing a flaw in what I said without lying.
You are losing on the battlefield, in the courts, in the halls of power and on TERB. You lose everywhere just like the man you loathe and consider a pathetic loser, trump.
You have so much in common with him. LOL Lying, hate and losing.
Last edited:
How can this be happening Shack of sit? You told us a month ago it was all over.
www.ynetnews.com
Hamas reasserts control of parts of Gaza after Israeli withdrawal
Month after IDF withdrawal from key northern Gaza regions, terror group slowly returns, paying partial wages to public workers amid IDF bombings; IDF footage shows Hamas attacking civilians in Khan Younis, blocking their move to safety
www.ynetnews.com
That's your favourite word when the facts don't fit your narrative. It's a bitch when your tactics are used against you deal with it. Thinking that you can slide your ridiculous parameters as to what is relevant or not is what is truly feeble and hilarious. You've admitted that you are not neutral in this conflict. That's an admission that what you post is biased and untrue.
A claim of 75 years of occupation is "low hanging fruit". It is irrelevant.
That's a big word for you. As such it's not surprising that you used it improperly.
This non-occupation started approx. 25, 000 days ago. And it's just more of the same old, same old over and over again. Ho hum. This war, initiated by Hamas is slightly over 100 days old.
On a relative basis one is recent and one is ancient. Complaining and whining about the same thing for 25,000 days is going after low hanging fruit. Let's talk about the destruction that Hamas instigated because of the Oct.7 attack. That is what is relevant. Let's talk about the hostages that Hamas refuses to return, defying the ICJ orders from 8 days ago. That is relevant. It's clearly NOT low hanging fruit because you haven't come close to reaching it. All you do is deny, deflect and move the goalposts.
It started 25,000days ago. That is ancient.
Hamas' declaration to remove all Jews from Israel continues today.
Hamas' refusal to abide by ICJ rulings continues today.
Hamas' use of Gazan civilians as human shields continues today.
Hamas stealing humanitarian aid meant for the starving populace continues today.
Lie.
Lie. Israel has NOT been convicted by any international court of any genocide.
Your whole post is irrelevant because it is one lie after another.
