INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE: LATEST
- Thread starter niniveh
- Start date
You quoted the ruling but then attempted to twist what they said.
That is not only wrong, it is a blatant lie intended to incite hatred. Hate speech appears to be your native tongue.
Perhaps Biden is trying to cover his ass with the ICJ
Yes, Israel must prevent killing Palestinians.
86. For these reasons,
The COURT,
....
The state of Israel shall....take all measures within its power to prevent...,in particular:
(a) killing members of the group.
Israel must ceasefire and stop killing Palestinians to abide by the ICJ ruling.
There is no other reasonable interpretation of that demand.
ICJ made no mention of this.
And BTW, I was responding to Klattu's interpretation of "prevention".
Just read your first line.
are you arguing that because X tries to prevent fires. That fires are happening?
If a fire Marshall order you to install a sprinkler system, or smoke detectors. Is your house is burning down?
If a human rights organization says to take all measure to prevent discrimination. Does that mean that company ABC has discriminatory practices and is actively discriminating against “Palestinians”?
Last edited:
Ask them. I just read the words in their clear and unambiguous ruling which means that it does not require an interpretation. If they felt that genocide had occurred they would have clearly said so. They didn't. To think that they would list all of the things that didn't happen is kinda stupid.
Once again are actually unable to understand clear English or are you being willfully ignorant. They never said to STOP anything. As such your claim of having provided proof is hogwash. Why do you feel the need to persist in posting lies in general and this one in particular? The word STOP does not appear in their directives.
Considering that your argument is based on lies and false interpretations, it's working perfectly well.
It is very rare for a genocide charge to be laid[/QUOTE]Come back to me when they've been convicted. That argument is not working very well for you.
So we are in agreement that the ICJ imposed no sanctions.
Stop with your utterly transparent bullshitting. They clearly did not tell Israel to stop anything. That's why your only comeback is making a false/stupid equation using parameters that the ICJ did NOT rule that Israel was guilty of. As such your point is completely moot. If you can't produce the part where the ICJ actually used the actual word STOP to Israel you should just STFU with this ridiculous argument. It's not working for you. You're embarrassing yourself.
But it is not the policy of the Israeli government. Those are two very different things. That's like saying MTG statements are the policy of the Republican party. More nonsensical arguments that are not working well for you.
So you're saying that this statement is coming from a civilian. To funny and too weak.
Destroying Hamas has been a constant and unwavering goal since Oct. 7. This is not breaking news. Trying to eliminate terrorists is accepted as a totally legal objective.
You need new arguments that work better for you.
They dont have to be convicted. Their own politicians have pretty much incited genocide and the ICJ has tactfully acknowledged its existence. The only reason they are not convicted is due to protection from the US.
That is neither news, nor anything in your favour of your arguments.
It very much is. Both current and past politicians, as well as public opinion, expressly state the intent to dispossess, ethnically cleanse and/or kill Palestinians. It has been Israel's policy for the last 75 years.
Yes, and it also came from the Israeli president, as I linked above. And it also came from many of Israel's cabinet ministers. It came from their minister of defense, who if you did not know, is leading this war.
Ethnically cleansing and taking land has been a constant and unwavering goal for Israel for the last 75 years. Hamas was also propped up and enabled and funded by the CURRENT administration of Israel. Come back to me when you stop jump through hoops like a trained seal for genocidal maniacs.
[/QUOTE]
The ICJ has specifically said “take all measures to prevent”…not stop. Two very different words.and it’s not proof. That’s your opinion
“IF” the ICJ had said
“Take all measures to prevent further genocide” You’d have a case.
Lies and bullshit. Find the word STOP in their instructions to Israel. Filthy lying on your part. Your morals are on par with those of Hamas.
I am debating with a lying moron.
More stupidity. You'd lose in a grade 7 debate. You don't have even 1 argument with a shred of logic. It's painful to read such rubbish. It's cringe worthy. I'm even starting to feel embarrassed for you.
So somebody being charged with uttering hate speech against Jews means the same as being convicted of hate speech.
Bottom line is they have not even been charged let alone convicted. So until then, your proclamations are nothing more than speculation/rumour. Like farts in the wind. You are desperate to be able to prove a single point. At least you're giving frank and Klap hard-ons.
Their policies are put in writing on Gov't of Israel letterheads or on Israeli Gov't official website. Show us.
Which still doesn't make it official Israeli policy.
There are 5 mentions of children in the ICJ ruling.
You wanna know how many in South Africa's charges?
You should read this story, you're going to be explaining why you supported this crap for the rest of your life.
A Pediatrician’s Two Weeks Inside a Hospital in Gaza
No space, no supplies, and harrowing life-and-death decisions.
