Impeachment Trial

136 million people voted in 2016
160 million voted in 2020

These numbers alone should be alarming

And most states were closely contest.
Results were basically 49/51 or 48/52

Very suspicious to say the least... or an indicator how divided a coutry is
 
What contradiction is that, partisan hack? The employment numbers took a dive in 20, late spring. As for full employment; depending on the matrix, anything below 4% is considered full employment.
How could it be full employment when you admit that millions of jobs had been lost? That is a contradiction. The reason doesn't matter. Either it is full or it isn't.

BTW, are you trying to say that you are not partisan? You are impartial?
 
How could it be full employment when you admit that millions of jobs had been lost? That is a contradiction. The reason doesn't matter. Either it is full or it isn't.
Jesus H. Murphy! Because Trump was a president longer than a few months in 20. Are you pretending that you're dense just to troll me? Seriously.
 
Jesus H. Murphy! Because Trump was a president longer than a few months in 20. Are you pretending that you're dense just to troll me? Seriously.

You don't get to stop counting job reports just because of covid.
Trump left with 3.5 million fewer jobs for americans.

What's your problem, you're not operating with only 1/4 of a brain are you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: shakenbake
I don't even know what you are saying here either.

I don't want to assume he is making some kind of "magical negro" reference, but it is very possible.

So, basically, if 49% of people voted for someone in the first election and 47% in the second while majority voted for someone else, the said person should be prohibited for running again? If, indeed, the vast majority does not like Trump, they will not vote for him. However, if it is a split vote withing a 5% margin, trying to ban him from running because you are afraid he can get the votes is called...

No, he should be prohibited from running again because he committed high crimes and misdemeanors while in office. Unfortunately, the Senate didn't choose to do that because of partisanship, even if it was the most bipartisan agreement he should be convicted ever in the history of the country.

That he won once despite the fact most people didn't want him to be President in the first place is an indictment of the electoral system. That he might run again and win without even managing a plurality of votes in 2024 is an indictment of the electoral system. That Congress put to the question whether he should be barred from office is because he is manifestly unfit and proved it by his conduct while in office.

136 million people voted in 2016
160 million voted in 2020

These numbers alone should be alarming

And most states were closely contest.
Results were basically 49/51 or 48/52

Very suspicious to say the least... or an indicator how divided a coutry is

Why are the numbers suspicious?
 
  • Like
Reactions: shakenbake
Why are the numbers suspicious?
20210214_151402.jpg

For one the turnout for 2020 is a record number since... ever.

I suppose mail-in ballots with 0 signature verification had something to do with it.
 
View attachment 33404

For one the turnout for 2020 is a record number since... ever.

I suppose mail-in ballots with 0 signature verification had something to do with it.
turnout was record breaking in each and every state. Do all of them have 0 signature verification?
 
  • Like
Reactions: shakenbake
For one the turnout for 2020 is a record number since... ever.

I suppose mail-in ballots with 0 signature verification had something to do with it.

Mail in ballots did, sure. So did an increase in early voting.
Remember, the GOP has been actively trying to suppress voting for decades.
There is a reason the last time you saw turnout numbers like this they were right after the Voting Rights Act. That provoked the backlash to find other ways to stop "the wrong kind of voters" from voting.
You also see big jumps in voting when people feel they fucked up by not voting last time. So after 2000, you see a 5% jump in 2004. Then in 2008 it goes up again because "we fucking need to get the GOP out, Bush ruined everything".
Voting ticks down again because Obama years are stable.
The media pushes really hard in 2016 for "they are both terrible, don't bother voting" so voting stays low and you get more wanker 3rd party voting.
The voting population reacts with "Holy shit, maybe voting matters" in response to all that and so things shoot up again.

Now, if the John Lewis Voting Rights bill gets passed, we are likely to see numbers stay in the 60s for a while, I bet.
The GOP is actively pushing at the state level to restrict voting further, though. (Separate from the states where they are passing laws saying that voting in Presidential elections doesn't count and the legislature can just overrule the vote and decide the winner.)
 
Yes, yes... GOP supressed all those years, so 20+ million more people voted in 2020.

If only they had the power to suppress that many people...
 
136 million people voted in 2016
160 million voted in 2020

These numbers alone should be alarming

And most states were closely contest.
Results were basically 49/51 or 48/52

Very suspicious to say the least... or an indicator how divided a coutry is

LOL. Why is it suspicious that more people voted. The US has a very low participation rate in elections. There were huge get out the vote drives that were successful. Your fearless leader lost. get over it. He is a loser. A crybaby and perhaps the sorest loser in history who was prepared to see the US democracy destroyed rather than admit. What a pathetic, classless grifter.
 
Yes, yes... GOP supressed all those years, so 20+ million more people voted in 2020.

If only they had the power to suppress that many people...

They're trying.
The problem with voter suppression is unless you can actively use force or just flat out throw out votes arbitrarily, it has to be a series of "make it harder" moves and those can be overcome with concentrated effort and organization if they are too public.
 
Yes, yes... GOP supressed all those years, so 20+ million more people voted in 2020.

If only they had the power to suppress that many people...
The Trump years coincided with massive political polarization and involvement, all spurred by the internet. Numbers went up and will continue to remain high as long as there is this degree of polarization.

Trump challenged these figures 63 x in court and lost 63 times. It's a little silly for you to think that you've figured out the "fraud" all by yourself, just by looking at the numbers. 63 judges looked at the same shit and just shrugged. They actually know what they are doing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shakenbake
I don't want to assume he is making some kind of "magical negro" reference, but it is very possible.
I doubt it. He doesn't even like Hollywood.

And even if he did, it would probably be more like a "manic pixie dream boy" reference.
 
Last edited:
Suppose we'll see new numbers in 2024

Let's wait...
 
View attachment 33404

For one the turnout for 2020 is a record number since... ever.

I suppose mail-in ballots with 0 signature verification had something to do with it.


LOL. Get over it. Your hero lost. All yhe myths which he attempted to perpetrate were debunked. All the results were verified and re-verified by Dem and GOP state government. > 50 courts, both Dem and GOP judges including judges appointed by the words sorest loser, looked at it. The grifter in chief played you and your friends for fools and you are just demonstrating why it was soo easy to fleece them. And the grifting is not over.
 
LOL. Why is it suspicious that more people voted. ...
Like the rest of his type, he has no issue with 11 million more Trump voters coming out but finds it suspicious that there were 14 million more voters for the Democrat candidate.