Lol! Take off your partisan blindfold and get serious.Trump presided over full employment economy. Biden has a shit show on his hands and is actually killing jobs and opening the Southern border to further depress recovery instead of embarking on the economic recovery. If this continues, the Democrats will get slaughtered in 2022. The "impeachment" was a joke, not only ignored by the Chief Justice of the SCOTUS, but by much of the public. Interesting note, around 90% of the GOP voters completely ignored the "trial". In the coming months there will be more Trump obsession, but if that's all Dems have, Nancy will be moving into a smaller office in two years.
Impeachment Trial
- Thread starter Fun For All
- Start date
And in the end......
Trump gets more Martyrdom from which to grift another four years of donations into a superpac he will siphon money from while claiming its to run for him or his children.
And every reported lawsuit, attempt to criminally charge, video, news segment, article, blog, tweet and post that talks about him gives him another donation.
He is gone from social media, but in the end an industry of Trump news was created and too many people will have no content. No personal grift of their own.
He won't be going away, because in the end the Trump addiction continues. Only when people ignore him will he lose his power.
And here on this site the microcosm of the politics section proves it.
Trump gets more Martyrdom from which to grift another four years of donations into a superpac he will siphon money from while claiming its to run for him or his children.
And every reported lawsuit, attempt to criminally charge, video, news segment, article, blog, tweet and post that talks about him gives him another donation.
He is gone from social media, but in the end an industry of Trump news was created and too many people will have no content. No personal grift of their own.
He won't be going away, because in the end the Trump addiction continues. Only when people ignore him will he lose his power.
And here on this site the microcosm of the politics section proves it.
There were 3.5 million fewer employed americans at the end of Trump's twice impeached, least popular ever, reign.
He was a total failure on jobs.
I guess you missed that covid thing. Trump is also guilty of the massive unemployment in Canada, as well. Or is it OK to blame Justin? You tell me, I don't know who to blame, anymore. The partisan "logic" confuses me.
A majority of people have never voted for him. He didn't even ever receive a plurality of the people voting for him.
That's the problem. If it was just "a majority dislike him, he can't get elected" there wouldn't be a problem because we wouldn't even ever have had a President Trump.
You find logic and context very difficult, don't you?
Have to disagree. To the GOP/mobster mind "Win = I got away with it". The fact that the majority of the Senate, the majority of the House, and the majority of the country all think he did it and should have been convicted for it doesn't matter because he escaped punishment. It's like how the GOP argued in 2000 that any president who won in the electoral college but didn't win the popular vote would be invalid because it looked very possible that is what would happen with Al Gore but the moment that Bush won the electoral college without the popular vote they changed their minds.
"Getting away with it" despite everyone knowing you did it is a demonstration of power, so for them it counts as a win.
What does this have to do with Trump caring about the working man?
So it was ignored by a minority of the population is what you are saying?
Nothing. Jobs in particular and the labor market in general has no meaning to the working class. None whatsoever. LOL!!!
Is that the covid thing that he totally ignored and fucked up, causing more people to get sick and die than anywhere in the world? And because of so much spread so many businesses had to shut down and/or lay off employees?
Is that the covid thing that you're referring to? Nah, nobody missed it except the orange buffoon.
BTW, you admit that covid caused lots of unemployment, but claim that he presided over a full employment economy. You contradict yourself. As well, when was unemployment down to zero? Now that I must have missed.
Trump claimed Obama's recovery numbers as his own, so he gets the covid losses as well.
Its only fair.
Too bad he lost the election and didn't get a chance to leave with a good economy.
Now he'll be the least popular POTUS, twice impeached with the greatest job losses ever.
That's the guy you're backing, him with the tiki torch crowd.
Of course they do, but you said Trump was a champion of the working class.
Presiding over a functioning economy is not being a champion of the working class.
What did he do to support the working class?
What contradiction is that, partisan hack? The employment numbers took a dive in 20, late spring. As for full employment; depending on the matrix, anything below 4% is considered full employment.
Of course you don't because instead of listening to Obama, you were mesmerized by the pretty pictures.
So, basically, if 49% of people voted for someone in the first election and 47% in the second while majority voted for someone else, the said person should be prohibited for running again? If, indeed, the vast majority does not like Trump, they will not vote for him. However, if it is a split vote withing a 5% margin, trying to ban him from running because you are afraid he can get the votes is called...
Similar threads
