Impeachment Trial

90
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar
The reason he is "not gone" is because the mainstream media and all the left wing nighttime talk shows won't shut the fuck up talking about him.

When bonespurs initially declared his candidacy in 2015, the media treated him like a joke (and he was and is a joke). But he was so outrageous and so fucking gonzo that it was like a train wreck. They just couldn't help but look. They all figured out that fuckhead was good for ratings and ratings =,money. So it became all Trump all the time.

But no-one expected him to win even a primary, let alone the office.

CNN made Donald Trump.

To guys like Maher and Colbert et al, bonespurs was a gift from God. Comedy gold.

And now that he's out, they all still talk about him nonstop. Without him, things are mundane, even boring.

CNN is the worst. They've got nothing to say without Trump. Trump could drop dead tonight and they'd still talk about him 24 seven.

I wish they'd all shut up already and let him dry up like a piece of dog shit in the sun until he just blows away in the wind.
But he won't. His people now control the GOP.

THAT'S the issue.

Almost every local and state RC is now controlled by Trump partisans. The GOP rank and file still overwhelmingly believe that the Biden presidency is illegitimate. And Trump either runs again in 2024 or controls the choice of his heir. Ignoring that don't make it not so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar
But he won't. His people now control the GOP.

THAT'S the issue.

Almost every local and state RC is now controlled by Trump partisans. The GOP rank and file still overwhelmingly believe that the Biden presidency is illegitimate. And Trump either runs again in 2024 or controls the choice of his heir. Ignoring that don't make it not so.

I believe this one sums that up.

90
 
They already voted and decided that the "trial" is unconstitutional, therefore illegal. They're not bound by any make believe rules. That was the genius of Rand Paul's vote before the trial even began. LOL!

So you agree they shouldn't participate since they think the whole thing is illegal? They should walk out.

Jesus H. Kryptonite the "MOB" is the GOP! Who the fuck you people listen to? Who are those "experts" who missed the consistent support for Trump in high 90s through all his presidency?

No one missed it. The GOP is shrinking and the people who are left tend to support Trump strongly. This makes being a Republican who believes in liberty and democracy increasingly difficult since they are likely to lose a primary - especially one that is only open to registered Republicans.

I still think that CNN is more trustworthy than FOX news...

Yes, but CNN is impressively shitty. CNN international still has a decent reputation but the main American CNN has been mostly crap for ages.

But he won't. His people now control the GOP.

THAT'S the issue.

Almost every local and state RC is now controlled by Trump partisans. The GOP rank and file still overwhelmingly believe that the Biden presidency is illegitimate. And Trump either runs again in 2024 or controls the choice of his heir. Ignoring that don't make it not so.

The level of bugfuck crazy in the state GOP is something people aren't paying enough attention to.
 
So you agree they shouldn't participate since they think the whole thing is illegal? They should walk out.
antifa and blm activists should arrive to the Capitol and peacefully urge them to walk out and not vote.
Good to live in a society where peaceful activism is valued so highly!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar
Details on a conversation between Trump and the house rep leader, McCarthy are coming out today.
Wonder if they will call witnesses after all?

In an expletive-laced phone call with House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy while the Capitol was under attack, then-President Donald Trump said the rioters cared more about the election results than McCarthy did.

“Well, Kevin, I guess these people are more upset about the election than you are,” Trump said, according to lawmakers who were briefed on the call afterward by McCarthy. McCarthy insisted that the rioters were Trump’s supporters and begged Trump to call them off. Trump’s comment set off what Republican lawmakers familiar with the call described as a shouting match between the two men. A furious McCarthy told the President the rioters were breaking into his office through the windows, and asked Trump, “Who the f--k do you think you are talking to?” according to a Republican lawmaker familiar with the call.

The newly revealed details of the call, described to CNN by multiple Republicans briefed on it, provide critical insight into the President’s state of mind as rioters were overrunning the Capitol. The existence of the call and some of its details have been previously reported and discussed publicly by McCarthy. The Republican members of Congress said the exchange showed Trump had no intention of calling off the rioters even as lawmakers were pleading with him to intervene. Several said it amounted to a dereliction of his presidential duty.
 
Details on a conversation between Trump and the house rep leader, McCarthy are coming out today.
Wonder if they will call witnesses after all?

In an expletive-laced phone call with House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy while the Capitol was under attack, then-President Donald Trump said the rioters cared more about the election results than McCarthy did.

“Well, Kevin, I guess these people are more upset about the election than you are,” Trump said, according to lawmakers who were briefed on the call afterward by McCarthy. McCarthy insisted that the rioters were Trump’s supporters and begged Trump to call them off. Trump’s comment set off what Republican lawmakers familiar with the call described as a shouting match between the two men. A furious McCarthy told the President the rioters were breaking into his office through the windows, and asked Trump, “Who the f--k do you think you are talking to?” according to a Republican lawmaker familiar with the call.

The newly revealed details of the call, described to CNN by multiple Republicans briefed on it, provide critical insight into the President’s state of mind as rioters were overrunning the Capitol. The existence of the call and some of its details have been previously reported and discussed publicly by McCarthy. The Republican members of Congress said the exchange showed Trump had no intention of calling off the rioters even as lawmakers were pleading with him to intervene. Several said it amounted to a dereliction of his presidential duty.
honestly they should just prosecute him criminally..and then good luck finding 12 jurors with zero deplorables...
 
 
honestly they should just prosecute him criminally..and then good luck finding 12 jurors with zero deplorables...
That’s what I’ve been saying...Trump along with Rudy and Mo Brooks, inciting a riot...they’d have a better chance at a criminal trial.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shakenbake
When the Democrats used it did they result in anything close to the Capitol riots?
Of course. The whole summer cities burned. A church across the lawn from the White House was even set on fire. And did you forget the storming of the Supreme Court during the Kavanaugh hearings and Chuck Schumer threatening the Court?
 
Of course. The whole summer cities burned. A church across the lawn from the White House was even set on fire. And did you forget the storming of the Supreme Court during the Kavanaugh hearings and Chuck Schumer threatening the Court?
The summer riots were a protest of police brutality while the Capitol riots were for the “The Big Lie”...The summer riots didn’t have Joe Biden or any democrat encouraging them to riot while Trump did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shakenbake
The vote has been taken and half of the Senate voted the "trial" unconstitutional.

Not half because the vote that it was constitutional was carried including some republicans..
The reason he is "not gone" is because the mainstream media and all the left wing nighttime talk shows won't shut the fuck up talking about him.

When bonespurs initially declared his candidacy in 2015, the media treated him like a joke (and he was and is a joke). But he was so outrageous and so fucking gonzo that it was like a train wreck. They just couldn't help but look. They all figured out that fuckhead was good for ratings and ratings =,money. So it became all Trump all the time.

But no-one expected him to win even a primary, let alone the office.

CNN made Donald Trump.

To guys like Maher and Colbert et al, bonespurs was a gift from God. Comedy gold.

And now that he's out, they all still talk about him nonstop. Without him, things are mundane, even boring.

CNN is the worst. They've got nothing to say without Trump. Trump could drop dead tonight and they'd still talk about him 24 seven.

I wish they'd all shut up already and let him dry up like a piece of dog shit in the sun until he just blows away in the wind.

LOL. Yea i guess the GOP senators who will no doubt vote for acquittal are abrogating their oaths and duties because the are afraid of the mainstream media.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shakenbake
Well now we all understand that the best president in the history of America never incited any violence. How has he even lost his Twitter account? So unfair!
 
Last edited:
honestly they should just prosecute him criminally..and then good luck finding 12 jurors with zero deplorables...

Unfortunately, prosecuting someone for incitement is a much higher standard.

When the Democrats used it did they result in anything close to the Capitol riots?

You don't understand. For these people it is about magic words, not context. They said the word "fight". They questioned the legitimacy of Trump's win. People protested and marched and did sit ins in government buildings.
To people only capable of limited, binary thinking, these things are exactly the same as what happened on the 6th. It's like jcpro's magic words interpretation of the Constitution, a sort of ridiculous attachment to a black and white interpretation that bears no relation to reality but is tied into a kind of arid formalism.

In the end, It's just the dril tweet.

 
  • Like
Reactions: shakenbake
Unfortunately, prosecuting someone for incitement is a much higher standard.
not sure how significant that difference is. In the end of the day, one juror's reasonable doubt is another juror's balance of probabilities, so to speak. I.e. it's about jurors a lot more than it is about the black letter law.

First impeachment was also treated by all as if it was a criminal case and the deplorables were super happy to talk about it as such on social media etc.

Aside from politics, political will behind the prosecution etc, the higher standard legally speaking is: any one juror out of twelve can fuck up the case into a mistrial, while you only need 2/3 of the senate to convict.
But they do have their 1/3 so you may as well roll the dice and see what the 12 jurors would do.

That’s why I think in actuality it’s a purely political choice and decision.
 
Last edited:
not sure how significant that difference is. In the end of the day, one juror's reasonable doubt is another juror's balance of probabilities, so to speak. I.e. it's about jurors a lot more than it is about the black letter law.

First impeachment was also treated by all as if it was a criminal case and the deplorables were super happy to talk about it as such on social media etc.

Aside from politics, political will behind the prosecution etc, the higher standard legally speaking is: any one juror out of twelve can fuck up the case into a mistrial, while you only need 2/3 of the senate to convict.
But they do have their 1/3 so you may as well roll the dice and see what the 12 jurors would do.

The deplorables wanted to talk about it as if it was a criminal trial because it gave more protection for the president.
I see your point about it still is all about what the jurors are willing to do, but I still think getting a conviction for incitement in the US is very difficult.