How long before Canadians get mad??
- Thread starter langeweile
- Start date
But, Blitz, Help me understand, ok? Why have Canadians Changed into a group of worry warts? Is it because, as a population, we are aging?
Why do we analize, to a fault other people's belifes (like Creationism), and then tag them as monsters, or at least posible monsters.
When we know, that others consistanly, lie and steal, but we won't hold them acountable for their actions.
Why do we analize, to a fault other people's belifes (like Creationism), and then tag them as monsters, or at least posible monsters.
When we know, that others consistanly, lie and steal, but we won't hold them acountable for their actions.
Hey... here's an idea: Let's take the Conservative Party and split it into two groups. The first group will be made up of the social moderates and fiscal conservatives. Let's call them, for example, the "Progressive Conservatives" because of their policies.
Then, the second group, that tends to have it's base in Alberta and is much more socially conservative, and wants to completely reform the way that the country is run, can be called, say, the "Reform Party."
That way, people who are rightist and centre-right thinkers will have a choice, and not have to sell out their fiscal conservatism and maintain their social political base.
Then, the second group, that tends to have it's base in Alberta and is much more socially conservative, and wants to completely reform the way that the country is run, can be called, say, the "Reform Party."
That way, people who are rightist and centre-right thinkers will have a choice, and not have to sell out their fiscal conservatism and maintain their social political base.
I am neither a worry wort, aged, a pussy, reactionary or over analytical.Diode said:
Certainly, I realize that you did not use all of those adjectives.
Nobody has tagged creationists as monsters but they are to be feared as they tend to tag others as monsters.
We are in the process of holding people accountable.
Why vote in a party that would attempt to destroy all that has been built in this country? Must we vote for them so that we may hold them responsible later?
Naw, I'll remain comfortable with this federal leadership for now but could we plese ditch these "tits on a bull" provincial Liberals in Ontario?
why is it that if people disagree with your political views, they must be anti-anything? maybe, just maybe, they have a different point of view than you. maybe they have friends or family who are gay or who are women - and thus have real concerns about what the alliance will dojohnhenrygalt said:
That is exactly the argument that was used in Europe, when I left in 1985. Canada is not nearly as far gone as Europe, by any stretch of the imagination.red said:
Now is the time to talk and think about it, before Canada get's there.
Key Factor: Canadian Sovereignty
Everyone knows that if Harper had won his imagined majority last time, there would have been Canadian soldiers on the ground in Iraq, taking orders from
the Americans, and dying in the process.
The "New" Conservative party is very much on the same page as the Bush
Republicans. Canadians hated Mulroney for sucking up to Reagan. The idea that Canadian domestic and foreign policy would be dictated by Washington
is enough to drive Ontario and Quebec voters away from these "Neo-Cons".
Everyone knows that if Harper had won his imagined majority last time, there would have been Canadian soldiers on the ground in Iraq, taking orders from
the Americans, and dying in the process.
The "New" Conservative party is very much on the same page as the Bush
Republicans. Canadians hated Mulroney for sucking up to Reagan. The idea that Canadian domestic and foreign policy would be dictated by Washington
is enough to drive Ontario and Quebec voters away from these "Neo-Cons".
