This speaks volumes.Enonymouse said:We don't need this type of "Canadian". We never will need this type of Canadian.
What "type" of Canadian do we need and what do we do with the ones that don't make the grade?
This speaks volumes.Enonymouse said:We don't need this type of "Canadian". We never will need this type of Canadian.
you know the truth because your brother served and seen it all? interesting viewpoint.Enonymouse said:I'm good at that. I disregard the rights or terrorists.
In my view..this family are by no means Canadians...and should never be called Canadians. Canadians weren't fighting for the Taliban. Never were...never will be.
I disregard the lives of terrorists. My brother was in the Canadian Army..he's seen it all. I know the truth.
So yeah...I've done well haven't I.
don't like free speech either, eh? if they are terrorists- bring charges, have a trial and prove it.Enonymouse said:Have you even listened to his wife and daughter. Buddy ...the sins of the father have been handed down and they continue to sin.
With regards to the types of Canadians we need.....those who are NOT terrorists. We don't need those type.
Are you saying we do???
I don't want terrorists here either. I just want to make sure that being accused of being one is not all that's required. I want to ensure that if someone accuses me of such a thing, I will have the right to defend myself in a court, amoung my peers. Not too much to ask, is it?Enonymouse said:Have you even listened to his wife and daughter. Buddy ...the sins of the father have been handed down and they continue to sin.
With regards to the types of Canadians we need.....those who are NOT terrorists. We don't need those type.
Are you saying we do???
Unfortunately not. But they have enough planes to ship them all back Afganistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Turkey...and wherever else they came from.lookingforitallthetime said:BTW, according to the FBI, the U.S. has over a million terrorists. Gitmo won't hold them all.
You don't like free speech?Enonymouse said:No I don't like free speech when Khadr's sister is on TV saying she supports the Taliban and hates Western idealogy. Why is she living here then?
Go back...I'll pay for the ticket.
They are terrorists. That was proven as soon as they fought for and supported the taliban.
Wow. You completely missed the point (unless you actually believe there are a million U.S. citizens who are terrorists)!!!!Enonymouse said:Unfortunately not. But they have enough planes to ship them all back Afganistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Turkey...and wherever else they came from.
If they can fly kids to see Santa....they can fly the terrorists back to the caves.
Thanks for clearly demonstrating the type of Canadian you are.Enonymouse said:I'm betting there are millions of muslims in the uS....so about 1 Million are terrorists !
I think that's probably a stretch.lookingforitallthetime said:Thanks for clearly demonstrating the type of Canadian you are.
In my opinion, your type is far more dangerous than the Khadrs.
You just couldn't stay away could you. Man...I baited you with a one liner and you were back swinging.lookingforitallthetime said:Okay, that's enough. No more playing in the shallow end of the gene pool for me............
That's actually wrong, they aren't limited to Kabul. You read one document and over-generalized. The UN Resolutions authorized broad use of force across all of Afghanistan. That they've turned over much of the policin to ANA in many areas but at no time have they ever been limited to Kabul.red said:no they were acting as the security force for the afghan gov't. also their mandate was limited to kabul. they did not take over the country and were not at war with afghanistan. so they don't have the authority you now claim for them.
Really?Aardvark154 said:I think that's probably a stretch.
Who knows? He obviously has problems. I do know that if he were accused of such a thing, I would expect him to have the right to a trial.ManAboutTown said:Exactly how many hand grenades has he thrown?
As far as I can tell the expanded mandate came in 2003 but I could be wrong. if you can point to the UN resolution which gave them the authority as per your post above I would appreciate it. thanksfuji said:That's actually wrong, they aren't limited to Kabul. You read one document and over-generalized. The UN Resolutions authorized broad use of force across all of Afghanistan. That they've turned over much of the policin to ANA in many areas but at no time have they ever been limited to Kabul.