Guantanamo Khadr interrogations

Mar 19, 2006
8,767
0
0
Enonymouse said:
We don't need this type of "Canadian". We never will need this type of Canadian.
This speaks volumes.

What "type" of Canadian do we need and what do we do with the ones that don't make the grade?
 

red

you must be fk'n kid'g me
Nov 13, 2001
17,572
8
38
Enonymouse said:
I'm good at that. I disregard the rights or terrorists.

In my view..this family are by no means Canadians...and should never be called Canadians. Canadians weren't fighting for the Taliban. Never were...never will be.

I disregard the lives of terrorists. My brother was in the Canadian Army..he's seen it all. I know the truth.

So yeah...I've done well haven't I.
you know the truth because your brother served and seen it all? interesting viewpoint.

they are canadian. as canadian as you. they will continue to be canadian. Has anyone in the family been convicted of terrorism? if they have it has nothing to do with Omar khadr or do you believe that the sins of the father should be brought unto the sons and daughters?
 

Enonymouse

Member
Feb 26, 2007
111
16
18
Have you even listened to his wife and daughter. Buddy ...the sins of the father have been handed down and they continue to sin.

With regards to the types of Canadians we need.....those who are NOT terrorists. We don't need those type.

Are you saying we do???
 

red

you must be fk'n kid'g me
Nov 13, 2001
17,572
8
38
Enonymouse said:
Have you even listened to his wife and daughter. Buddy ...the sins of the father have been handed down and they continue to sin.

With regards to the types of Canadians we need.....those who are NOT terrorists. We don't need those type.

Are you saying we do???
don't like free speech either, eh? if they are terrorists- bring charges, have a trial and prove it.
 
Mar 19, 2006
8,767
0
0
Enonymouse said:
Have you even listened to his wife and daughter. Buddy ...the sins of the father have been handed down and they continue to sin.

With regards to the types of Canadians we need.....those who are NOT terrorists. We don't need those type.

Are you saying we do???
I don't want terrorists here either. I just want to make sure that being accused of being one is not all that's required. I want to ensure that if someone accuses me of such a thing, I will have the right to defend myself in a court, amoung my peers. Not too much to ask, is it?

BTW, according to the FBI, the U.S. has over a million terrorists. Gitmo won't hold them all.
 

Enonymouse

Member
Feb 26, 2007
111
16
18
No I don't like free speech when Khadr's sister is on TV saying she supports the Taliban and hates Western idealogy. Why is she living here then?

Go back...I'll pay for the ticket.

They are terrorists. That was proven as soon as they fought for and supported the taliban.
 

Enonymouse

Member
Feb 26, 2007
111
16
18
lookingforitallthetime said:
BTW, according to the FBI, the U.S. has over a million terrorists. Gitmo won't hold them all.
Unfortunately not. But they have enough planes to ship them all back Afganistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Turkey...and wherever else they came from.

If they can fly kids to see Santa....they can fly the terrorists back to the caves.
 
Mar 19, 2006
8,767
0
0
Enonymouse said:
No I don't like free speech when Khadr's sister is on TV saying she supports the Taliban and hates Western idealogy. Why is she living here then?

Go back...I'll pay for the ticket.

They are terrorists. That was proven as soon as they fought for and supported the taliban.
You don't like free speech?

You sound like the ideal "type" of Canadian. Where can we find more like you?
 
Mar 19, 2006
8,767
0
0
Enonymouse said:
Unfortunately not. But they have enough planes to ship them all back Afganistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Turkey...and wherever else they came from.

If they can fly kids to see Santa....they can fly the terrorists back to the caves.
Wow. You completely missed the point (unless you actually believe there are a million U.S. citizens who are terrorists)!!!!

Okay, that's enough. No more playing in the shallow end of the gene pool for me............
 
Mar 19, 2006
8,767
0
0
Enonymouse said:
I'm betting there are millions of muslims in the uS....so about 1 Million are terrorists !
Thanks for clearly demonstrating the type of Canadian you are.

In my opinion, your type is far more dangerous than the Khadrs.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,768
3
0
lookingforitallthetime said:
Thanks for clearly demonstrating the type of Canadian you are.

In my opinion, your type is far more dangerous than the Khadrs.
I think that's probably a stretch.
 

Enonymouse

Member
Feb 26, 2007
111
16
18
lookingforitallthetime said:
Okay, that's enough. No more playing in the shallow end of the gene pool for me............
You just couldn't stay away could you. Man...I baited you with a one liner and you were back swinging.

If you honestly think that I am am worse than the Khadr's, then you are one sorry piece of shit.

At some point in time you are going to wake the fuck up and realize that these pieces of garbage are manipulating the western governments and the laws we live under.

If we don't wake up, within your lifetime you'll be facing east to pray and yer old lady will be wearing a black bag over her head...which probably isn't a bad thing in your case ! HAH HA!
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
red said:
no they were acting as the security force for the afghan gov't. also their mandate was limited to kabul. they did not take over the country and were not at war with afghanistan. so they don't have the authority you now claim for them.
That's actually wrong, they aren't limited to Kabul. You read one document and over-generalized. The UN Resolutions authorized broad use of force across all of Afghanistan. That they've turned over much of the policin to ANA in many areas but at no time have they ever been limited to Kabul.
 
Mar 19, 2006
8,767
0
0
Aardvark154 said:
I think that's probably a stretch.
Really?

If his belief that all Muslims are terrorists isn't enough for you, see post #385.

You're American, right? If you want him, you can have him. He will fit in nicely in certain southern areas.
 
Mar 19, 2006
8,767
0
0
ManAboutTown said:
Exactly how many hand grenades has he thrown?
Who knows? He obviously has problems. I do know that if he were accused of such a thing, I would expect him to have the right to a trial.

Let me try to make myself clear, again. I have no loyalty to Khadr or terrorists. Find them, catch them, give them a trial and, if found guilty, lock them up and throw away the key. Prove a case against a terrorist and I'm behind you 100%. Untill that happens however, leave us the right to a fair and speedy trial. If not because it's the right thing to do than because there is a very real possibility one of us could be wrongfully accused.

This makes more sense to me than rounding up all the Muslims like your buddy wants to. Of course, I'm not a bigot.

You're in good company, congratulations.
 

red

you must be fk'n kid'g me
Nov 13, 2001
17,572
8
38
fuji said:
That's actually wrong, they aren't limited to Kabul. You read one document and over-generalized. The UN Resolutions authorized broad use of force across all of Afghanistan. That they've turned over much of the policin to ANA in many areas but at no time have they ever been limited to Kabul.
As far as I can tell the expanded mandate came in 2003 but I could be wrong. if you can point to the UN resolution which gave them the authority as per your post above I would appreciate it. thanks
 
Toronto Escorts