E Jean Carroll woman of the year!

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
95,695
24,418
113
Unfortunately for your narrative what guys say to each other in a locker room doesn't qualify as a rape conviction.
But maybe one day if your dream of a communist society comes true that may very well be the case and we can round up millions of men everywhere.
The court ruled he is a rapist who slanders his victims and ordered him to pay out $83 million.
That's your hero?
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,583
101,824
113
You do realize that the judge disallowed much of Trump's defense so the jury didn't get to hear two sides. It was rigged. Also as a lawyer you only get so many challenges to jury candidates. Blame cannot be placed on Habba here.
Kirk, the judge disallowed much of Trump's "defence" because it was res judicata from the first trial.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,583
101,824
113
So here is a question for anyone who knows???......

How much of that $83.3M is covered by Trump's insurance policies?????

😯🐘😯🐘:unsure:
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
7,592
4,656
113
The court ruled he is a rapist who slanders his victims and ordered him to pay out $83 million.
That's your hero?
You are the first to not accept a court ruling when it goes against your narrative and here you are accepting a court ruling that's in line with your narrative.
Oops...you tripped over your hypocrisy again.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
95,695
24,418
113
You are the first to not accept a court ruling when it goes against your narrative and here you are accepting a court ruling that's in line with your narrative.
Oops...you tripped over your hypocrisy again.
We are talking about your backing of a rapist who has to pay $83 million for slandering his victim.
Stop trying to change the channel.

Why do you keep backing a rapist?
Shouldn't even a legit accusation of rape make you question your support?
And $83 million?
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
7,592
4,656
113
We are talking about your backing of a rapist who has to pay $83 million for slandering his victim.
Stop trying to change the channel.

Why do you keep backing a rapist?
Shouldn't even a legit accusation of rape make you question your support?
And $83 million?
Why don't you accept your hypocrisy first?
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,751
7,707
113
Meidas Touch and BT Cohen are both fake news.

View attachment 292550
Mitch, your Twitter sources are the biggest fake news that no one on this Board actually trusts. But you keep on constantly posting them as if they are the Gospel Truth to you and you alone.
If both Medias Touch and BT Cohen are fake news to you, then go on and try to contradict what they stated!!
Here are other sources who corroborated that claim about the blatant liar of a lawyer called Alina Habba:

Alina Habba Spotted At Trump Victory Party After Delaying Defamation Trial Over Illness
The former president’s legal team requested a trial delay, saying Habba had been exposed to COVID and had a fever. She attended the party one day later.






So tell us why that MAGA supporter who posted that photo was walked out of a Trump rally?
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,751
7,707
113

Let’s clear this E Jean Carroll situation up for everyone who doesn’t understand how things work: - Trump has never been convicted or even investigated for what she accused him of. - She doesn’t know what year it happened, and has even been caught in a few lies. - She brought the dress forward, but the dress didn’t even exist in the years she claimed it happened. - Trump was not on trial for this. He was on trial for calling her a liar and other names. - The Jury is from a far left district, so Trump had no shot at a fair hearing. - She didn’t make these accusations until 20 years later. She even said she fantasizes about it happening before. - The only reason she could even sue was because democrats changed the laws for 1 year in New York. The law was changed the day Trump got out of office. - She wasn’t going to sue until anti Trump people talked her into it and offered to pay
See, how you buy the sources of the actual fake news. Trump lost the $83.3 Million case for trying to defame her in spite of losing the case against her.
Yet you bring up some online conspiracy theorist hypothesis, just like you believe that the 2020 elections were "stolen"!! 😄 😆😂🤣

 
  • Haha
Reactions: mitchell76

y2kmark

Class of 69...
May 19, 2002
18,995
5,409
113
Lewiston, NY
When it comes to Trump, he is always guilty. If the courts rule against him, then justice has prevailed. If the courts rule in his favour, then he has successfully found a loophole to exploit. The one unassailable truth however is that he is never innocent. The guy is a grade A scumbag.
No! The guy is a jumped up second rate scumbag!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kautilya

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,583
101,824
113
Megyn Kelly interviewing Glenn Greenwald is like a turd interviewing a pool of vomit at the bottom of a sewer.

Mitchy, I want you to read the wiki definition of "res judicata" to figure out why Trump couldn't re raise liability at the 2nd trial - as opposed to just arguing about damages.

 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
7,592
4,656
113
Stop trying to change the subject.
This is about rump paying $83 million for slandering a woman the courts said he raped and you defending his rape.
"Stop trying to change the subject"...says the guy who continually tries to change the subject every time he's cornered in every thread.

How hypocritical of you! But we have all come to expect that from you.

My only complaint is that it's getting boring and you need new tactics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
95,695
24,418
113
"Stop trying to change the subject"...says the guy who continually tries to change the subject every time he's cornered in every thread.

How hypocritical of you! But we have all come to expect that from you.

My only complaint is that it's getting boring and you need new tactics.
Salon has a good piece on how rape culture is just part of the right wing.
Kind of sums up your views pretty well.

 
  • Like
Reactions: bver_hunter

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
7,592
4,656
113
Salon has a good piece on how rape culture is just part of the right wing.
Kind of sums up your views pretty well.

Maybe you can put some effort into finding sources that instruct you on how to win arguments. You're failing miserably. Invest in yourself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
7,007
2,473
113
Megyn Kelly interviewing Glenn Greenwald is like a turd interviewing a pool of vomit at the bottom of a sewer.
If a news commentator with national recognition and experience on a national platform is a "turd" and another journalist with national recognition is "a pool of vomit". Your metaphor is weak (and leans a little too heavy into potty humour), but your hatred of these personalities is strong!

Given the imagery they provoke, try not to think of them during your lunch.

However, "I hate what they say" would be far more concise and less upsetting to your psyche!
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,583
101,824
113
If a news commentator with national recognition and experience on a national platform is a "turd" and another journalist with national recognition is "a pool of vomit". Your metaphor is weak (and leans a little too heavy into potty humour), but your hatred of these personalities is strong!

Given the imagery they provoke, try not to think of them during your lunch.

However, "I hate what they say" would be far more concise and less upsetting to your psyche!
They've both figured out that the best way to make a LOT of money is to give a point of view - that neither of them genuinely believes - that appeals to a far right audience. It's a pablum of lies for childish, easily fooled people feeding their simple-minded confirmation bias.
 
  • Love
Reactions: SchlongConery
Toronto Escorts