As a career politician, chow will have to pander and owe those who got her there, i.e, unions, special interest groups and her NDP supporters. She'll owe too much to too many for her to be a credible and effective mayor. She's going to want to re-invent the wheel while trying to be all things to all people....as long as they live in the less affluent areas of downtown.
Tory on the other hand owes nothing to nobody and when it comes right down to it, he really has nothing to prove not does not he need the position. He's well known for his business acumen not to mention he's highly sought out for his charitable work. If you have a good cause and you need to raise money and get the word out, there's nobody better. He's doing it for the right reasons, to serve his city. Stintz, is like Chow, in that she's in it for herself, Ford on the other hand did it for the right reasons but he turned out to be a narcissistic sociopath.
Tory on the other hand owes nothing to nobody and when it comes right down to it, he really has nothing to prove not does not he need the position. He's well known for his business acumen not to mention he's highly sought out for his charitable work. If you have a good cause and you need to raise money and get the word out, there's nobody better. He's doing it for the right reasons, to serve his city. Stintz, is like Chow, in that she's in it for herself, Ford on the other hand did it for the right reasons but he turned out to be a narcissistic sociopath.
Last edited: