Danielle Smith turns her back on Canada...
- Thread starter nottyboi
- Start date
x.com
x.com
BAHAHAHAHA!
Danielle Smith’s attempt to sell out Canada to Trump was such a MASSIVE failure that she’s NOT invited to his indoor inauguration in DC!
Now she wants to watch it from the Canadian Embassy? That’s for Team Canada.
Go watch at Mar-a-Lago, traitor
Geez Health Canada and Theresa were recommending that you get all of your shots.
That's completely against what you were preaching on here...Shocking I say...just shocking...LOL.
Golly it takes whole wack carbon to make one of those there lithium-ion batteries Mr. Bver.Yes, an Electric Car. So what is your point?
You should ditch the car really...Wait!...Do you own a Tesla?
Last edited:
once again you put your ignorance on full display
All Canadian companies receive Capital cost allowance tax deductions for investing capital in equipment, software, mineral rights, oil land leases, farming equipment, automobiles furniture etc. to grow the business
it is applied against taxable income
it is in the tax code to promote economic growth
oil companies pay billions to the Federal and Provincial in royalties.
even if the company loses money, the royalties are still due
and then they corporate taxes on top of that ... if they are profitable
Capital cost allowance tax deductions are entirely different than the govt subsidizing the purchase of an uneconomical product
Real climate deniers are the ones taken to court in climate lawsuit
by those committed to fighting climate change.
Like pro-wrestling where the winners are usually the bad guys climate
deniers are also the winners in the court most of the time.
Norway’s Supreme Court Makes Way for More Arctic Drilling (Published 2020)
The top court ruled against environmental groups Tuesday, saying the right to a clean environment did not bar the government from drilling for offshore oil.
Groups appeal fed’s approval of Bay du Nord in court
Environment and Indigenous groups continue their legal challenge of Bay du Nord, a $16B oil and gas megaproject proposed off Newfoundland’s coast.
ecojustice.ca
Last edited:
Too funny
$8B in loan guarantees on a pipeline they had to by for $4.5B that eventual cost more than $34 B of taxpayer money..
Did you want to know why they paid $4.5 B - because they had made the business environment so terrible via regulation no private company would touch it . Kinder Morgan's shareowners grabbed that $4.5 B and ran way as fast as they could
nice try, EDC did not spend $8 B of govt money on oil , they just facilitate payment guarantees for exported products
projects they mandated
meanwhile
$34 Billion directly in govt coffers to spend on Hospitals, health care, roads and the social safety net the loonie lefties cherish so much, but will bitch and complain when they lose them
trying to kill this cash cow is so stupid
they prefer to be called skeptics
i guess you did not stop to think the reason they win in court so often is because they are rational and right ?
you do not see many climate skeptics gluing themselves to the payment or destroying priceless art now do you?
who believes an irrational uninformed lunatic ?
Now despite what you think of Trump you will have to concede now that he is president elect , his time will be at a premium , with governors senators , CEOs and all sorts of diplomates / heads of states requesting some of his time. correct ?
again independent of what you personally think of him you will have to concede any president elect Trump, Bide, Bush, Obama, Clinton etc. etc. all had lots of people asking to see them when they were president elect , correct ?
Hundreds , maybe thousands correct ? (again , independent of what you personally think of him).
Why do you think a premier of a foreign province with less than 5 million people received an invite ?
about the same population as Wisconsin and that governor likely did not get an invite
Why do you think a premier of a foreign province with less than 5 million people received an invite ?
Last edited:
whether it was a good investment is not the point., but it destroys your point that Trudeau wanted to kill the oil business.
Are you saying Trudeau and Guilbeault didn't truly intend the oil industry
and the rest of Canada to attain zero emission by 2050? I thought Guilbeault
was serious about reinforcement of the 35% emission cap for Alberta
oilsands production by 2030.
And correct me if I am wrong, To the best of my knowledge other sectors
like aviation is not subject to similar emission cap demand.
Trudeau and his Liberals would not want to kill the oil business entirely.
They need the oil royalties to fund spending. The Liberals even promoted
and approved deep water drilling in Newfoundland. But according to Guilbeaut
Bay Du Nord was approved on the condition of zero-emission by 2050.
Last edited:
no it does not
he painted himself into a corner and had to buy it
buying that pipeline was never in the original Gerald Butts plan,.
he did not care about the price, its other peoples money
you are being completely disingenuous if you claim he , Butts and the lunatic Guilbeault did not want to kill the industry
Last edited:
Joining in late to the discussion.
Not as much as Canada has sucked at the teat of Ontario, the country's economic driving force. Maybe we should tell the rest of the country to go fuck themselves.
do you think intentional trying to destroy a provinces economic engine and governments cash cow is a good strategy ?
good governess ? WTF
particularly when your number one responsibility is to ensure the country's unity ?
in fact intentional trying to destroy a provinces economic engine is likely the optimal strategy if you wanted to destroy unity
Justin Trudeau has never understood the responsibilities of his office
the results speak for themselves - a complete and undeniable disaster
Last edited:
every single decision Trudeau and his sycophants have made has an overlaying political objective - to retain power
Environment Minister McKenna refuses to assess Cement Plant with One Megaton GHG emissions - Nature Canada
Alberta is punished by the corupt liberals ...... because they do not have enough voters to bribe
Alberta remembers Pierre Trudeau’s energy export taxes, even if you don’t. When Alberta sends billions every year to Atlantic Canada and Quebec, they have a say in anything that could ruin that province’s economy.
Traitors? Close to 50% of Quebeckers want to separate, why are they at this table?
