Obsession Massage

Danielle Smith turns her back on Canada...

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,563
3,151
113
Danielle Smith’s attempt to sell out Canada to Trump was such a MASSIVE failure that she’s NOT invited to his indoor inauguration in DC!
Now despite what you think of Trump you will have to concede now that he is president elect , his time will be at a premium , with governors senators , CEOs and all sorts of diplomates / heads of states requesting some of his time. correct ?
again independent of what you personally think of him you will have to concede any president elect Trump, Bide, Bush, Obama, Clinton etc. etc. all had lots of people asking to see them when they were president elect , correct ?
Hundreds , maybe thousands correct ? (again , independent of what you personally think of him).

Why do you think a premier of a foreign province with less than 5 million people received an invite ?
about the same population as Wisconsin and that governor likely did not get an invite
Why do you think a premier of a foreign province with less than 5 million people received an invite ?
 
Last edited:

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
10,449
2,387
113
there wre 4 privately funded pipelines ready to go when the moron came to power
he killed three and overpaid for the fourth because he had painted himself into a corner
like all things govt, a 4.5B pipeline turned into a 34 B taxpayer money pit

any you think this is an accomplishment
every thing he touches turns to shit, really expensive shit

energy east would have given Canada leverage over Trump
The moron killed that
he is unbelievably stupid
whether it was a good investment is not the point., but it destroys your point that Trudeau wanted to kill the oil business.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,717
2,161
113
Ghawar
whether it was a good investment is not the point., but it destroys your point that Trudeau wanted to kill the oil business.
Are you saying Trudeau and Guilbeault didn't truly intend the oil industry
and the rest of Canada to attain zero emission by 2050? I thought Guilbeault
was serious about reinforcement of the 35% emission cap for Alberta
oilsands production by 2030.

And correct me if I am wrong, To the best of my knowledge other sectors
like aviation is not subject to similar emission cap demand.

Trudeau and his Liberals would not want to kill the oil business entirely.
They need the oil royalties to fund spending. The Liberals even promoted
and approved deep water drilling in Newfoundland. But according to Guilbeaut
Bay Du Nord was approved on the condition of zero-emission by 2050.
 
Last edited:

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,563
3,151
113
whether it was a good investment is not the point., but it destroys your point that Trudeau wanted to kill the oil business.
no it does not
he painted himself into a corner and had to buy it
buying that pipeline was never in the original Gerald Butts plan,.

he did not care about the price, its other peoples money

you are being completely disingenuous if you claim he , Butts and the lunatic Guilbeault did not want to kill the industry
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: wigglee

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,873
10,245
113
Toronto
I also note that she's telling the ROC to go pound sand for any retaliatory measures against the US that will hurt oil and gas sales. Good for her. Canada has for too long sucked the teet of Alberta's oil wealth while at the same time demeaning them.
Joining in late to the discussion.

Not as much as Canada has sucked at the teat of Ontario, the country's economic driving force. Maybe we should tell the rest of the country to go fuck themselves.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,563
3,151
113
Do you think that governing by spite is a good strategy?
do you think intentional trying to destroy a provinces economic engine and governments cash cow is a good strategy ?
good governess ? WTF
particularly when your number one responsibility is to ensure the country's unity ?

in fact intentional trying to destroy a provinces economic engine is likely the optimal strategy if you wanted to destroy unity

Justin Trudeau has never understood the responsibilities of his office
the results speak for themselves - a complete and undeniable disaster
 
Last edited:

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,563
3,151
113
Are you saying Trudeau and Guilbeault didn't truly intend the oil industry
and the rest of Canada to attain zero emission by 2050? I thought Guilbeault
was serious about reinforcement of the 35% emission cap for Alberta
oilsands production by 2030.

And correct me if I am wrong, To the best of my knowledge other sectors
like aviation is not subject to similar emission cap demand.

Trudeau and his Liberals would not want to kill the oil business entirely.
They need the oil royalties to fund spending. The Liberals even promoted
and approved deep water drilling in Newfoundland. But according to Guilbeaut
Bay Du Nord was approved on the condition of zero-emission by 2050.
every single decision Trudeau and his sycophants have made has an overlaying political objective - to retain power

Environment Minister McKenna refuses to assess Cement Plant with One Megaton GHG emissions - Nature Canada

Alberta is punished by the corupt liberals ...... because they do not have enough voters to bribe
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

Grist

Well-known member
Aug 8, 2017
800
1,421
93
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-premiers-trudeau-meeting-trump-tariffs-1.7431085

Does this surprise anyone? She did not even attend the meeting joined remotely from Panama. What a traitor!! She is probably trying to buy the Canal for her master Trump
Alberta remembers Pierre Trudeau’s energy export taxes, even if you don’t. When Alberta sends billions every year to Atlantic Canada and Quebec, they have a say in anything that could ruin that province’s economy.
Traitors? Close to 50% of Quebeckers want to separate, why are they at this table?
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,910
1,667
113
once again you put your ignorance of what you speak on full display

Trudeau regulated that pipeline to death
Part of the Gerald butts plan





do not pretend Trudeau and Butts did not set out to destroy the Canadian oil and Gas industry
You act like the Trudeau govt are eco nazis and ignore shit like this:


The Line 3 pipeline is an oil pipeline owned by the Canadian multinational Enbridge. Operating since 1968, it runs 1,031 miles (1,659 km) from Hardisty, Alberta, Canada to Superior, Wisconsin, United States.

Concerns about the safety of the pipeline led Enbridge to reduce its capacity. Over its history, the pipeline has been the source of millions of gallons of oil spills, including a 1991 oil spill in Grand Rapids, Minnesota, that was the worst inland oil spill in U.S. history.

You really don'ty give a shit about pollution or the collateral effects of jobs and lives and environment destroyed by oil. The correct future for the oil industry in Canada is to accept that oil demand for fuel will decline and to pivot to petrochemicals. Canada and Alberta should have a strategy to make Canada a world hub for petrochemicacl production instead of just digging it up and selling it.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,910
1,667
113
Alberta remembers Pierre Trudeau’s energy export taxes, even if you don’t. When Alberta sends billions every year to Atlantic Canada and Quebec, they have a say in anything that could ruin that province’s economy.
Traitors? Close to 50% of Quebeckers want to separate, why are they at this table?
what % of Albertans wanna seperate? It would be pretty funny if AB separates and EVs take over and drive oil back down to $20 lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

Grist

Well-known member
Aug 8, 2017
800
1,421
93
You act like the Trudeau govt are eco nazis and ignore shit like this:


The Line 3 pipeline is an oil pipeline owned by the Canadian multinational Enbridge. Operating since 1968, it runs 1,031 miles (1,659 km) from Hardisty, Alberta, Canada to Superior, Wisconsin, United States.

Concerns about the safety of the pipeline led Enbridge to reduce its capacity. Over its history, the pipeline has been the source of millions of gallons of oil spills, including a 1991 oil spill in Grand Rapids, Minnesota, that was the worst inland oil spill in U.S. history.

You really don'ty give a shit about pollution or the collateral effects of jobs and lives and environment destroyed by oil. The correct future for the oil industry in Canada is to accept that oil demand for fuel will decline and to pivot to petrochemicals. Canada and Alberta should have a strategy to make Canada a world hub for petrochemicacl production instead of just digging it up and selling it.
Better to buy oil from despotic countries that have zero pollution regulations?
Oil is in everything, without it, we live in the stone age.
Lives lost? Are you referring to Lac-Megantic? I don’t recall anyone dying in an Alberta or Saskatchewan oil spill.
Whoever is the next PM needs to use emergency measures to rapidly build the pipeline east. And, new refineries need to be built in Canada.
The environment concerns are valid, but our 2 trillion trees mitigate any excess carbon. If that isn’t satisfactory, we could send Trudeau to China on a mission to close their hundreds of coal fired refineries etc. That will be amusing.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,563
3,151
113
You act like the Trudeau govt are eco nazis and ignore shit like this:


The Line 3 pipeline is an oil pipeline owned by the Canadian multinational Enbridge. Operating since 1968, it runs 1,031 miles (1,659 km) from Hardisty, Alberta, Canada to Superior, Wisconsin, United States.

Concerns about the safety of the pipeline led Enbridge to reduce its capacity. Over its history, the pipeline has been the source of millions of gallons of oil spills, including a 1991 oil spill in Grand Rapids, Minnesota, that was the worst inland oil spill in U.S. history.

You really don'ty give a shit about pollution or the collateral effects of jobs and lives and environment destroyed by oil. The correct future for the oil industry in Canada is to accept that oil demand for fuel will decline and to pivot to petrochemicals. Canada and Alberta should have a strategy to make Canada a world hub for petrochemicacl production instead of just digging it up and selling it.
You really don'ty give a shit about pollution or the collateral effects of jobs and lives and environment destroyed by oil. as you wanted to ship 100 MM barrels across the country for a redundant fools "Strategic Oil Reserve"

it is just easy to make you look stupid
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,563
3,151
113
what % of Albertans wanna seperate? It would be pretty funny if AB separates and EVs take over and drive oil back down to $20 lol.

since you are wrong just about all of the time
how funny would it be for Canada if EVs do not take over, AB separates and oil goes to $200 ?

Like him or not as president elect, Trumps time is currently in high demand by governors, senators, CEOs and heads of state

Why do you think a premier of a foreign province with less than 5 million people received an invite ?
about the same population as Wisconsin and that governor likely did not get an invite
Why do you think a premier of a foreign province with less than 5 million people received an invite ?
 
Toronto Escorts