Asia Studios Massage

CupidsEscorts Tweets a Client's Information

Status
Not open for further replies.

apoptygma

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2017
3,043
100
48
Do you know the full story of that other situation?
No.
I've only paid attention to this incident.
Based on the original twitter post, and Jillian's staunch defense of her actions on twitter after the fact... personally I am happy with just staying away, period.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,719
10,122
113
Toronto
No, just some other due forms of process would be nice
Not necessary. Just like the cops have dash cams, the SPs could have pussy cams that would show everything that happened (with mics of course).

Actually, they could implant it in the perineum and view 180 degrees to both holes. It automatically resolves every dispute.


I bet you're wrong
I agree. I'd surmise that between Cupids and Toronto Passions, over 50% of the GTA outcall market is served, which is actually quite large, assuming my assumption is unassumingly correct. I wouldn't be surprised if SFT is 3rd.
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,884
241
63
Boycott if you want to.

Boycott if you disagree with the prinicple of outing.

Boycott if the mininal risl of being outed concerns you.

But if you think you will punish her and affect her business you wont be missed.
 

essguy_

Active member
Nov 1, 2001
4,429
19
38
Boycott if you want to.

Boycott if you disagree with the prinicple of outing.

Boycott if the mininal risl of being outed concerns you.

But if you think you will punish her and affect her business you wont be missed.

Jesus. People will use or not use Cupids for all sorts of reasons. This is just one more factor to consider. What makes you think this is about "punishment"? You keep lecturing as if you possess some insight that no others have.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
20,775
15,337
113
Boycott if you want to.

Boycott if you disagree with the prinicple of outing.

Boycott if the mininal risl of being outed concerns you.

But if you think you will punish her and affect her business you wont be missed.
Do you have shares in Cupids? I don't believe any agency believes their business will not suffer at the end of a bad news Terb thread. It's not good for business.
 

malata

RockStar
Jan 16, 2004
3,826
172
63
Paradise by the dashboard light.
Jesus. People will use or not use Cupids for all sorts of reasons. This is just one more factor to consider. What makes you think this is about "punishment"? You keep lecturing as if you possess some insight that no others have.
there is that 1 percent chance, he could be a teacher

 

Brill

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2008
8,679
1,193
113
Toronto
If you posted about boycotting more than 20 times in this thread, some may think you have a vested interest in her competition.
:pizza:
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,884
241
63
Jesus. People will use or not use Cupids for all sorts of reasons. This is just one more factor to consider. What makes you think this is about "punishment"? You keep lecturing as if you possess some insight that no others have.
Absolutely it is just one more factor.

As for the punushment comment it seems thats the tone some people are giving off.
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,884
241
63
Do you have shares in Cupids? I don't believe any agency believes their business will not suffer at the end of a bad news Terb thread. It's not good for business.
First off look for the last tine i posted about cupids and decide for yourself. I rarely talk about then.

If i was supporting them i would tell you not to boycott. At no point did i say that. I also stated that outing is wrong.

As for effects on business.....for as long as i have been on terb alpha care spa has been the butt of jokes for its shabby facilities etc yet it remains open. In other words bad reviews and reputation has not hurt them. They are still open with a fair sized roster despite being near muse, flirt, platinum and bunch of b level spas.

I know of many asian mp with grandmas and terrible fscilties and zero terb presence that have been open for over 10 years.

So the market is much bigger than terb members.

Cupids can expect to remain busy.
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,884
241
63
I will just leave with this..... go to cupids or boycott..... just dont bother telling us what you choose to do.
 

Occasionally

Active member
May 22, 2011
2,928
7
38
I can't believe this thread has moved so fast it's already on page 12.

But here's my sum up....

- Client did a stupid thing (I will assume he did do that heinous act because I can see some clients doing it as opposed to an SP lying and trying to frame him)
- Cupids did a stupid thing by posting his name, number and address
- SPs and agencies claim they don't keep client's personal info
- SPs and agencies lie and they do keep them
- Some people support what Cupids did
- Some people don't support what Cupids did
- Cupids deleted the tweet a few days later
- Unless I missed a post, Cupids has been dead silent about this issue since
- Some posters say they will boycott them
- Personally, I don't think Cupids cares about any Terb member boycotts
- In the future, some assheaded clients will try pulling off that move again (no pun intended)
- In the future, the majority of classless acts are not publicly posted or outed by SPs or agencies, and will continue that way. They may communicate within the industry about it, but there will be hardly any public communication

Done.
 

doggystyle99

Well-known member
May 23, 2010
7,904
1,211
113
I look at it this way.... it means that at least one SP at cupids has limits on what she will do to avoid disease..... AND it means that the management stands behind their girls.

I completely appreciate both of those types of attitudes in a company that I would support. Yes I have used them in the past but that was a long time ago as I am 90% MP these days.

Honestly, if you conduct yourself properly you have nothing to worry about.

Boycotting the agency just means you are supporting a guy who likes stealthing.

I find it hilarious that these types of events brings out the haters.
You did label everyone who said they will avoid this agency as supporting the asshole which was the exact opposite of what people have posted in this thread. They said as much as they don't support the stealther they don't support Cupids putting his information on social media for vigilante justice. As for haters it's interesting that you label people who have never spoken ill of Cupids as haters.
BTW no one had used the term BOYCOTT majority had said they will avoid this agency there is huge difference between the meaning of those two words.

Boycott if you want to.

Boycott if you disagree with the prinicple of outing.

Boycott if the mininal risl of being outed concerns you.

But if you think you will punish her and affect her business you wont be missed.
Actually me avoiding her agency will affect her business as she will have one less customer. I am okay with that and if it really doesn't affect her business she would be too. But it is not relevant to you since you're not associated with Cupids, and whether people like me will be missed or not is not up to you to decide it's up to Cupids. Luckily in this city there are so many different agencies and indy SP's to choose from that I'll be fine with using others.

First off look for the last tine i posted about cupids and decide for yourself. I rarely talk about then.

If i was supporting them i would tell you not to boycott. At no point did i say that. I also stated that outing is wrong.

As for effects on business.....for as long as i have been on terb alpha care spa has been the butt of jokes for its shabby facilities etc yet it remains open. In other words bad reviews and reputation has not hurt them. They are still open with a fair sized roster despite being near muse, flirt, platinum and bunch of b level spas.

I know of many asian mp with grandmas and terrible fscilties and zero terb presence that have been open for over 10 years.

So the market is much bigger than terb members.

Cupids can expect to remain busy.
You are constantly telling the members who said they will be avoiding Cupids that they are supporting this asshole and you are telling us that Cupids won't miss our business so yes you are supporting them willingly or unwillingly.
BTW me not agreeing with Cupids is not me agreeing with the stealther as I have said numerous times. I think this asshole should have reported to the police so he doesn't pull this crap with another SP specially if they believe he has done this in the past, But I am guessing is less willing to go to the police as well themselves do to the possible ramifications that they might face.

I will just leave with this..... go to cupids or boycott..... just dont bother telling us what you choose to do.
Thanks, you can stop telling us that avoiding this agency will have no affect on their business or stop trying to justify this and the other outings she has made in the past. Constantly repeating yourself letting us know that by avoiding this agency it will have no affect on their business shows you to have an interest in this matter. Who knows maybe Cupids asked you to defend them or maybe you are WK in hopes of getting something out of your posts.

It's really interesting that for a person who sees mostly MPA's and not Escorts, for someone who said outing the person was the wrong thing to do, for someone who keeps telling other members that our business will not be missed by Cupids, you try to justify Cupids wrongdoings.
 

peepingtom

Member
Jul 20, 2012
941
2
16
Do you know the full story of that other situation?
It doesn't matter the situation. Outing a client or your own girl is intolerable. No situation will excuse such bad behaviour.

I will just leave with this..... go to cupids or boycott..... just dont bother telling us what you choose to do.
Who's "us" that you speak for? Cupids? LMAO

I will NOT boycott Cupids because boycotting is an act of punishment and I'm not such authority to dish out punishment.

However, I will AVOID Cupids so as to avoid given my personal information over to an untrustworthy person.

See, there is a difference between boycotting and avoidance.
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,884
241
63
You did label everyone who said they will avoid this agency as supporting the asshole which was the exact opposite of what people have posted in this thread. They said as much as they don't support the stealther they don't support Cupids putting his information on social media for vigilante justice. As for haters it's interesting that you label people who have never spoken ill of Cupids as haters.
BTW no one had used the term BOYCOTT majority had said they will avoid this agency there is huge difference between the meaning of those two words.



Actually me avoiding her agency will affect her business as she will have one less customer. I am okay with that and if it really doesn't affect her business she would be too. But it is not relevant to you since you're not associated with Cupids, and whether people like me will be missed or not is not up to you to decide it's up to Cupids. Luckily in this city there are so many different agencies and indy SP's to choose from that I'll be fine with using others.



You are constantly telling the members who said they will be avoiding Cupids that they are supporting this asshole and you are telling us that Cupids won't miss our business so yes you are supporting them willingly or unwillingly.
BTW me not agreeing with Cupids is not me agreeing with the stealther as I have said numerous times. I think this asshole should have reported to the police so he doesn't pull this crap with another SP specially if they believe he has done this in the past, But I am guessing is less willing to go to the police as well themselves do to the possible ramifications that they might face.



Thanks, you can stop telling us that avoiding this agency will have no affect on their business or stop trying to justify this and the other outings she has made in the past. Constantly repeating yourself letting us know that by avoiding this agency it will have no affect on their business shows you to have an interest in this matter. Who knows maybe Cupids asked you to defend them or maybe you are WK in hopes of getting something out of your posts.

It's really interesting that for a person who sees mostly MPA's and not Escorts, for someone who said outing the person was the wrong thing to do, for someone who keeps telling other members that our business will not be missed by Cupids, you try to justify Cupids wrongdoings.
To address a few points.

I admit that I didn't read all the posts, just some of them so some of the statements reached further than reality. My fault.

Good point avoid and boycott are different.

I do see SPs mainly indies on backpage. I don't write reviews because their ads disappear quickly and I choose them based more on convenience and a quick fuck. Not really stuff to write home about.

And I'd appreciate if you didn't say that I am trying to justify their actions. All I was saying was that people gave the victim of the outing the benefit of the doubt so Cupid should get some leeway too. Also stating they were wrong to out several times is not support.

I haven't exchanged a PM with Jillian in around 10 years.

Pointing out the futility of ones actions doesn't mean I have an interest. As I have provided examples of MP where bad terb press has not prevented them from keeping a stable of girls and operating for over a decade.

To put it another way terb only represents a portion of their business.
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,884
241
63
It doesn't matter the situation. Outing a client or your own girl is intolerable. No situation will excuse such bad behaviour.



Who's "us" that you speak for? Cupids? LMAO

I will NOT boycott Cupids because boycotting is an act of punishment and I'm not such authority to dish out punishment.

However, I will AVOID Cupids so as to avoid given my personal information over to an untrustworthy person.

See, there is a difference between boycotting and avoidance.
By US I meant terbites. I'm not interested in who you won't see. I'd rather hear about who you want to see.
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,884
241
63
I can't believe this thread has moved so fast it's already on page 12.

But here's my sum up....

- Client did a stupid thing (I will assume he did do that heinous act because I can see some clients doing it as opposed to an SP lying and trying to frame him)
- Cupids did a stupid thing by posting his name, number and address
- SPs and agencies claim they don't keep client's personal info
- SPs and agencies lie and they do keep them
- Some people support what Cupids did
- Some people don't support what Cupids did
- Cupids deleted the tweet a few days later
- Unless I missed a post, Cupids has been dead silent about this issue since
- Some posters say they will boycott them
- Personally, I don't think Cupids cares about any Terb member boycotts
- In the future, some assheaded clients will try pulling off that move again (no pun intended)
- In the future, the majority of classless acts are not publicly posted or outed by SPs or agencies, and will continue that way. They may communicate within the industry about it, but there will be hardly any public communication

Done.
Well put
 

fall

Well-known member
Dec 9, 2010
2,740
679
113
If we assume the same "pattern of outing" (3 in 15 years) will continue, the risk is, indeed, very small. The major problem, however, is that we cannot assume that. This incident reveals that the agency, indeed, keeps a record of clients' personal information which may leak out. The most important problem, however, is that it reveals that "outing" is not a taboo for the owner. So, there is a risk that in the future she may get pissed with all Johns or maybe she already hates all Johns and SPs working for her but tolerate us because it is a businesses. But when the business will die (or she will retire) what will prevent her from publishing the list of all the client simply because she thinks it is a good idea? Or, help us God, what if she will become religious and decides that prostitution is bad and everybody who were involved in it should be punished, and she is the one who should carry out this punishment. So, should we still assume that there will be only 1 outing per 5 years?
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,884
241
63
If we assume the same "pattern of outing" (3 in 15 years) will continue, the risk is, indeed, very small. The major problem, however, is that we cannot assume that. This incident reveals that the agency, indeed, keeps a record of clients' personal information which may leak out. The most important problem, however, is that it reveals that "outing" is not a taboo for the owner. So, there is a risk that in the future she may get pissed with all Johns or maybe she already hates all Johns and SPs working for her but tolerate us because it is a businesses. But when the business will die (or she will retire) what will prevent her from publishing the list of all the client simply because she thinks it is a good idea? Or, help us God, what if she will become religious and decides that prostitution is bad and everybody who were involved in it should be punished, and she is the one who should carry out this punishment. So, should we still assume that there will be only 1 outing per 5 years?
Keeping a record of clients is not unique to cupids. I had a SP from backpage text me to indicate she was back in my area (as she tours around). Thankfully the text just said "hi"

But did she(Jillian) keep a record? Or did the incident happen and the manager looked at the number of who just called to book? Even some landlines will let you look at call history. I'd be surprised if agencies delete numbers immediately.

That said. You decide if 3 outings (probably not random/unprovoked but not justifiable outings) is bad enough for you to stop going.

Anyways will Fuji please start a thread on blacks and crime or gun control so I can write 12 pages on something else?

I apologize to anyone who thought I was lecturing them.

I can be verbose and I enjoy a good discussion. Often times with long discussions I have an idea at the beginning and it's not always fleshed out. So it takes time to work it out. And in the meantime responding to questions regarding my posts can lead to tangents.

At the end of the day I can be certain of a few things..... Cupids won't change and you'll still get laid (somewhere)
 
Last edited:

rhuarc29

Well-known member
Apr 15, 2009
9,648
1,304
113
Ihe most important problem, however, is that it reveals that "outing" is not a taboo for the owner. So, there is a risk that in the future she may get pissed with all Johns or maybe she already hates all Johns and SPs working for her but tolerate us because it is a businesses. But when the business will die (or she will retire) what will prevent her from publishing the list of all the client simply because she thinks it is a good idea?
That's a good point I didn't think of. It does show that she lacks certain principles.
Instead, she seems to think that two wrongs make a right. That shows a lack of wisdom and maturity in itself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts