If we assume the same "pattern of outing" (3 in 15 years) will continue, the risk is, indeed, very small. The major problem, however, is that we cannot assume that. This incident reveals that the agency, indeed, keeps a record of clients' personal information which may leak out. The most important problem, however, is that it reveals that "outing" is not a taboo for the owner. So, there is a risk that in the future she may get pissed with all Johns or maybe she already hates all Johns and SPs working for her but tolerate us because it is a businesses. But when the business will die (or she will retire) what will prevent her from publishing the list of all the client simply because she thinks it is a good idea? Or, help us God, what if she will become religious and decides that prostitution is bad and everybody who were involved in it should be punished, and she is the one who should carry out this punishment. So, should we still assume that there will be only 1 outing per 5 years?