I have no idea what you are trying to say.And even one of those was due to internal forces and not outside interference by an exploiter
I have no idea what you are trying to say.And even one of those was due to internal forces and not outside interference by an exploiter
1) We have millions of Cuban refugees with family in Cuba who have influence.
2) We are likely the only nation who can actually be a catalyst for change.
I said their are no black and white answers. One could ask how do you know if the Cuban population wants us to stay out of Cuban affairs.
Certitude can be arrogance.
PS- I'm reminded of a history lesson that doesn't perfectly fit this situation but begs some thought. The Thirteen American colonies were British in 1775. That is a fact. As much a fact that Canada was British. The French government lent significant military support to the American rebels to defeat British rule.
that makes 2 of youI have no idea what you are trying to say.
The French helped the Americans because France was at war with Britain and it served their interest to helpSometimes outside interference is needed in this case it's USA. If it were Canada or UK someone could say why is the UK trying to help them? Are they really trying to obtain land like they did decades ago? We have to wait and see the outcome as we do not know the future.
The French helping Americans from British rule is a good example.
the eastern bloc countries certainty did not choose to be commieAnd even one of those was due to internal forces and not outside interference by an exploiter
I do think a McCubano would be a good sandwich.Cuba needs capital and the US is a natural trade partner
That does not mean they have to invite the US mafia back in or have a Starbucks on every corner
While there are always people on social media who sympathize with Cuba, China, Venezuela, etc. I do think Butler believes American intervention often works out badly.Western Germany experienced better quality of life compared to East.
Northern Europe is making america look third world.Western Germany experienced better quality of life compared to East.
The USA benefit? No. Certain donors who thrive on insider trading, arms deals, clansdine resource exploitation, and other nefarious shit.While there are always people on social media who sympathize with Cuba, China, Venezuela, etc. I do think Butler believes American intervention often works out badly.
I don't agree with his America the exploiter claim. I don't always think there is much economic incentive for the U.S. in many of these situations.
If you think the U.S. needs another Caribbean travel destination to build hotels and resorts, that's an oversimplification of the situation. If Cuba becomes a more desirable tourist destination, it will because a future Cuban government truly welcomes U.S. and other foreign investment. Some of you know current foreign investment in Cuba has to adhere to strict govt. regulations and "co-ownership" sort of speak.
There are a host of countries (some JohnLarue listed) where U.S. pressure led to more freedom for various peoples around the world.
I used to believe that, and then the 2008 financial crisis happened. I saw incompetence rewarded, not punished. Fast forward a couple of decades, and I see corrupt governments that are bought by foreign interests. And then, to top it all off, I see the Epstein blackmail plan.A democracy with a free market based economy, where merit/ hard work / risk taking are rewarded and incompetence and corruption can be voted out of power.
democracy and capitalism are not perfectI used to believe that, and then the 2008 financial crisis happened. I saw incompetence rewarded, not punished. Fast forward a couple of decades, and I see corrupt governments that are bought by foreign interests. And then, to top it all off, I see the Epstein blackmail plan.
The democracy you speak of does not exist.
Can we send you a basket? It would seem you need one to carry that load.The USA benefit? No. Certain donors who thrive on insider trading, arms deals, clansdine resource exploitation, and other nefarious shit.
Oh ya. Cripes this administration is involved in that Polymarket shit now.
They are about to spend billions on Iran, why?
Uh huh.....do you really think Trump in any way is looking at Cuba altruistically?Can we send you a basket? It would seem you need one to carry that load.
Cuba is small potatoes and a more open regime would be encouraging European, Canadian, South American investment as well as the U.S. The opportunities for capital would be split up by many.
Iran? Theocratic Iran is a threat to the entire Mideast. The Mideast oil supply is vital to the world economy. Like it or not, the U.S. protects that supply line for Europe and Asia.
Btw, as an aside, how do you think 100,000's of refugees will be welcomed in Florida?Can we send you a basket? It would seem you need one to carry that load.
Cuba is small potatoes and a more open regime would be encouraging European, Canadian, South American investment as well as the U.S. The opportunities for capital would be split up by many.
Iran? Theocratic Iran is a threat to the entire Mideast. The Mideast oil supply is vital to the world economy. Like it or not, the U.S. protects that supply line for Europe and Asia.
I think you have basically set-up a straw man of somewhat comfortable existences for the people of Cuba and Iran. Can't really argue with that if you truly believe that. As I said, neither of us know what the Cuban people want. You can project things, but they lack that witness.Uh huh.....do you really think Trump in any way is looking at Cuba altruistically?
All they see is an exploitable work force on an island where they can set the lack of labor laws. Build a playground, especially for the rich, sell prime beach land off, and control the govt.
Just like pre Castro.
And Iran looks at what happened to Libya, Iraq and Syria and sees what their future is. This is about Israel wagging the USA dog. The USA is basically Israel's bitch now.
It's discerning when people project some type of comfortable lives in these countries. Stability achieved through oppression is granted status.Have you thought about moving to a Communist or Socialist country instead of living in Canada?
That's what corrupt governments tell you so you never bother fighting corruption.All government is corrupt this isn't anything new. If you had to pick between a nation that's democratic or communist you'd probably pick demo. If you had to pick between capitalism and socialism you'd most likely pick capitalism.
You're some rich business man in Russia when Putin took over and gave oligarchs a choice otherwise telling them to leave Russia then you pick if you wanna support your country or not since the government used you as an ATM.
The government is generally made of folks who were already rich and have power or folks who wanna become rich and have power.
All party leaders in North America deal with corruption but would you rather start a business in North America to become rich or try in Cuba where chances are a lot less?
C'mon Wyatt, you know this is a Rubio vanity project, and the disaster capitalists will love it, especially if a bunch of rebuilding projects need contracts. They don't actually care if it succeeds, just that money is available. It's just as likely to end up another Haiti, but I genuinely don't think they really care. It's much easier to grift in chaos.I think you have basically set-up a straw man of somewhat comfortable existences for the people of Cuba and Iran. Can't really argue with that if you truly believe that. As I said, neither of us know what the Cuban people want. You can project things, but they lack that witness.
Cuba is not some economic bonanza for evil capitalists. You have to live with and know Cuban-Americans. They carry around a lot of anger. They also are in contact with the people on the island. It's just a unique situation.
By the way, Caribbean beaches, resorts, casinos, etc. are not so special. Rich and middle-class people play over the world now. There's nothing exceptional about Cuba anymore. I think you have been watching Godfather II.
Iraq was a mess, but again I am not sure the people aren't better off and happier with their government. Iraq was three ethnicities united under a common oppression. Same pretty much goes for Libya. I'm not sure why you mention Syria. I think you threw Syria in because you were kitchen sinking.






