The Porn Dude

Court has ruled Emergencies Act during Trucker convoy was unconstitutional

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,729
7,689
113
oh man...

it doesn't matter what you or I believe

don't you know that

“For the love of money is the root of all evil.”
For once believe this very simple fact...... it saved lives. Otherwise this could have been a catastrophe that could have seen it hurting our nation for decades.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dvous11

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,729
7,689
113
dude now you are just confused or ...

bridge blockade was taken care of by Ford
It was causing a $4 billion loss per day to the Canadian economy. The Police were able to end it. But did it make sense with you for this convoy to then block this flow of goods?
Both Trudeau and Ford agreed with the need to remove this blockade ASAP, unless you believe that it was of no issue to you!!
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,729
7,689
113
just because you believe it doesn't make it a fact
OIC, so the Pandemic that has occurred these past two centuries are hoaxes as far as lives are concerned. Say no more!!
 

JuanGoodman

Goldmember
Jun 29, 2019
4,854
4,353
113
It was causing a $4 billion loss per day to the Canadian economy. The Police were able to end it. But did it make sense with you for this convoy to then block this flow of goods?
Both Trudeau and Ford agreed with the need to remove this blockade ASAP, unless you believe that it was of no issue to you!!
it was a first real show of resistance to the draconian measures put forth by our government

it had to be done to stop Trudeau from completely running a mock
 
  • Like
Reactions: dvous11

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
34,936
67,203
113
Do you prefer a different term for "guilty" that would make you feel comforted in his defence?
I have no problem with "the decision to issue the Proclamation does not bear the hallmarks
of reasonableness – justification, transparency and intelligibility – and was not justified in
relation to the relevant factual and legal constraints that were required to be taken into
consideration."

I have no problem with saying the government violated the rights of some people and they should be allowed to sue because of it.

I do have a problem with saying "Mr Trudeau was found guilty" because that isn't what was being determined here.
 

JuanGoodman

Goldmember
Jun 29, 2019
4,854
4,353
113
I have no problem with "the decision to issue the Proclamation does not bear the hallmarks
of reasonableness – justification, transparency and intelligibility – and was not justified in
relation to the relevant factual and legal constraints that were required to be taken into
consideration."

I have no problem with saying the government violated the rights of some people and they should be allowed to sue because of it.

I do have a problem with saying "Mr Trudeau was found guilty" because that isn't what was being determined here.
come on, let us rejoice

it has such a nice ring to it

"Mr Trudeau was found guilty"
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
34,936
67,203
113
isn't "I hate Trudeau" enough?

"an eye for an eye" I'm sure that's somewhere in the constitution
At least you are honest it is just motivated by hate.

But sure, "an eye for an eye" could work.
That would mean freezing Trudeau and everyone who supported the Emergency Act's accounts for 10 days or so.
 

JuanGoodman

Goldmember
Jun 29, 2019
4,854
4,353
113
At least you are honest it is just motivated by hate.

But sure, "an eye for an eye" could work.
That would mean freezing Trudeau and everyone who supported the Emergency Act's accounts for 10 days or so.
when the leader hates his country and his people

it's only reasonable to expect the same feeling for him by the citizens

10 days will be a good start

also do not forget about couple of organizers going to jail and their bail being rejected
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
34,936
67,203
113
when the leader hates his country and his people

it's only reasonable to expect the same feeling for him by the citizens

10 days will be a good start
"A good start"
So you are more a "two eyes for one eye" kind of guy.

also do not forget about couple of organizers going to jail and their bail being rejected
What does that have to do with this ruling?
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
34,936
67,203
113
there were more damages done to some protesters then just 10 day frozen bank accounts

some had their operating license suspended
Was that found to be in violation of their rights, though?

it's important when calculating eye for an eye penelty
Oh, I see.
So your revenge should be out of all proportion to the actual violation of the rights?
That's how we need to calculate things?
 

JuanGoodman

Goldmember
Jun 29, 2019
4,854
4,353
113
Was that found to be in violation of their rights, though?
it was caused by unjust deceleration of emergencies act

Oh, I see.
So your revenge should be out of all proportion to the actual violation of the rights?
That's how we need to calculate things?
relax you are exaggerating, you are a smart guy, you don't need to do that

all I said was that 10 days would be a good start

no more no less

lets first find out what all the damages were done and act accordingly
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
34,936
67,203
113
it was caused by unjust deceleration of emergencies act
How so?

relax you are exaggerating, you are a smart guy, you don't need to do that

all I said was that 10 days would be a good start

no more no less

lets first find out what all the damages were done and act accordingly
But you just said that things that weren't caused by this violation should be included in the damages.
 

JuanGoodman

Goldmember
Jun 29, 2019
4,854
4,353
113
How so?



But you just said that things that weren't caused by this violation should be included in the damages.
ok you are a good negotiator

I will settle for freezing bank accounts for 10 days for all Liberal party members and their online supporters
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

roddermac

Well-known member
Sep 17, 2023
1,783
1,472
113
Canada was not "shut down" by the Federal Government of months during the Pandemic. Take your gripe to the Ford Govt. and other Provincial Premiers who for once did the right thing.
After all lives are more precious than paper money!!

Even Ford agreed with the Emergency Powers, as he was helpless. After all it was his responsibility at a Provincial level that failed, and the Federal Govt. then stepped in!!

This noisy disruption including the blockages to the daily lives of the Ottawa citizens was of zero merit!!
I agree that is was the premiers that are responsible for the completely useless lockdowns. It was never about health and safety. The lockdowns were pointless and ruined small businesses and all other aspects of life. You don't shutdown society over a virus with a 99.98% survival rate. You can't eradicate a virus in 2 weeks. And Ford was the only Premier to agree with the EA. All the rest were opposed to it. Tells you all you need to know about Dougie.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,729
7,689
113
it was a first real show of resistance to the draconian measures put forth by our government

it had to be done to stop Trudeau from completely running a mock
Next time invite this FreeDumb Truckers to honk day and night in your neighbourhood. The Canadians needed the flow of Essential products as the Health and wellbeing of our seniors etc was in danger of being compromised without their medications. But you right wingers moan and groan about the loss of revenue, but yet bow to these far right extremists who were compromising our trade with our biggest partners!!
 
Toronto Escorts