So he is wrong in stating the provincial government failed in their support for Ottawa?Justice Paul Rouleau was a friend and supporter of Justin's dad...Gee I wonder if that affected his decision.
You forgot the toilet paper.
So he is wrong in stating the provincial government failed in their support for Ottawa?Justice Paul Rouleau was a friend and supporter of Justin's dad...Gee I wonder if that affected his decision.
You forgot the toilet paper.
You don't like the British royals either, but there is actually a queen of Canada. Put her in charge and you might actually have be-headings...Trudeau and his entire cabinet should resign.
As any good orafice like Lolicle will tell you...You forgot the toilet paper.
The Canadian system makes it much easier to get rid of a prime minister than the US impeachment system.It's unfortunate that Canada does not have the same impeachment process as the US because this would be a good reason for it.
What was Trudeau found guilty of here?Our judges should be respected even if they make rulings that go against your narrative.
Trudeau is guilty.
a federal judge found that invoking the act was done prematurely and did not meet the legal requirements to do so. He also found that some measures infringed on the charter.What was Trudeau found guilty of here?
Federal Court Justice Richard Mosley concluded that the decision to declare an emergency fell short of the requirements under the Emergencies Act. He also found some of Ottawa’s temporary measures aimed at the protests infringed the Charter. Mosley found.
And a few other thingsThe harm being caused to Canada’s economy, trade, and commerce was very real and concerning,” said Mosley. “But it did not constitute threats or the use of serious violence to persons or property.”
Except the courts have ruled it didn't meet the threshold. And the NDP as official opposition is just playing politics. And the person doing the report is a Liberal hack seeking to deflect.If I may because you sure like pulling shit out of your ass LOL
In it, Justice Paul Rouleau wrote: "I find the province of Ontario's reluctance to become fully engaged in such efforts directed at resolving the situation in Ottawa troubling," citing the province's refusal to take part in tripartite meetings with the federal government and city officials.
Greater engagement by Ford and his government could have "provided the people of Ottawa with a clear message that they had not been abandoned by their provincial government during a time of crisis," Rouleau wrote.
- Ford government slammed for 'troubling' inaction during convoy protest in Emergencies Act report
- Federal government met the threshold to invoke Emergencies Act: Rouleau
Doug Ford 'ghosted' people of Ottawa during Freedom Convoy, NDP alleges
Premier Doug Ford refused to answer questions in the legislature about a damning report outlining “Ontario’s absence” during the Freedom Convoy as the NDP accused him of “ghosting” the people of Ottawa.toronto.ctvnews.ca
Had there been greater collaboration at the political level from the start, it could well have assisted in ironing out the communication, jurisdictional, and resourcing issues that plagued the early response to the protests,” Rouleau said in the report.(opens in a new tab)
“It could also have assisted in identifying authorities available to each level of government that might have been used to respond to the protests and coordinate direct engagement with protesters. It could also have provided the people of Ottawa with a clear message that they had not been abandoned by their provincial government during a time of crisis.”
Popcorn going in, butt hurt balm going out. Whatever happened to "let the voters decide"?...a federal judge found that invoking the act was done prematurely and did not meet the legal requirements to do so. He also found that some measures infringed on the charter.
He also said this
And a few other things
Invocation of Emergencies Act unreasonable, measures against Freedom Convoy unconstitutional: court
Federal Court found decision to declare emergency fell short of Emergencies Act requirementswww.canadianlawyermag.com
I’d say that’s a far cry better, far more substantial and far more serious than accusations. Would you agree?
whether you do or not, and given a lot here felt and feel it’s enough to bar Trump, would you also agree it’s hypocritical to not just be defending and deflecting but not to be calling for JTs resignation? At least pending an appeal.
Because isn’t that how the system, the aim and goals of constitutions, and rules are supposed to work? Is that not why we have them?
Fact of the matter is, in plain blunt English. if he doesn’t step down pending an appeal, why the fuck do we even have them.
What’s the fucking point?
***************
/puts on the popcorn waiting for everyone’s gymnastics
The police would have been correct to remove the Ottawa protesters too. That's not what's at issue here. The issue here is the government invoking an Act that grants them extraordinary powers, and they did so when there was no threat to national security, as is required by the Act. There's a reason this Act was called the Wartime Act prior to 1988.Of course the right wingers will still say police are correct to try to stop Palestinian protests.
isn’t that one of the main themes in a democracy? Freedom of choice and all that? And is that not also why we have constitutions and charters of rights? To prevent government overreach?Popcorn going in, butt hurt balm going out. Whatever happened to "let the voters decide"?...
Violating the Canadian Charter or Rights.What was Trudeau found guilty of here?
well now we are getting philosophical and all that. Like fear and greed rule everyone to one degree or another. So does fear of change…When an elected government doesn't listen to it's population, make unpopular decisions, put livelihoods of thousands/millions in a compromised situation, then something radical must be done. Ie: truck convoy, farmer protests all over EU etc.
Why are we not discussing the reasons for people to protest? Does someone think that truck drivers had nothing better to do than drive for thousands of miles and take over the government???
Doesn't matter who abuses the power, right, left, center, blue, red. Whatever! Why are we excusing bad behavior??? Liberals did this, but oh Conservatives did that... 2 wrongs don't make a right.
Fuck em all if they don't serve their people. We, the people, should keep our government accountable for their actions!!!
I do not support the Palestinian protestors but you cannot compare the two protests. One was an occupier of a city the other protests and goes home. It is a big difference. I expect the police to manage the protests during the day but in Ottawa and the bridge, it was a full-blown occupation that needed to be quelled and squashed quickly. I hold the Ottawa police as first to blame for allowing the convoys to get set up. I hold the Provincial government secondly to blame for not assisting Ottawa quickly before the Freedum twats became entrenched and I say great job Justin for kicking their foul asses out of Ottawa.The police would have been correct to remove the Ottawa protesters too. That's not what's at issue here. The issue here is the government invoking an Act that grants them extraordinary powers, and they did so when there was no threat to national security, as is required by the Act. There's a reason this Act was called the Wartime Act prior to 1988.
My personal issue with what they did was that they were freezing the bank accounts of people supporting the protestors, and that they were labeling the protestors as terrorists. They may have been a nuisance and a disruption, but no where near rising to the level of terrorists. Same goes for the Palestinian protestors, by the way. Nuisance. Disruption. Not terrorists.
Admit it, you'd throw a fit if JT started freezing bank accounts of Pro palestinian protest organizers...the point is Police could've had those trucks towed, ticket the drivers and charge them the cost of towing....freezing bank accounts are bullshit...you know it...just won't admit it.Of course the right wingers will still say police are correct to try to stop Palestinian protests.
Ritchie, it wasn't as easy without the act as you think! These freedum twatbags were entrenched. At this point, Ottawa police were intimidated and needed the powers of the FEDS.Admit it, you'd throw a fit if JT started freezing bank accounts of Pro palestinian protest organizers...the point is Police could've had those trucks towed, ticket the drivers and charge them the cost of towing....freezing bank accounts are bullshit...you know it...just won't admit it.