I know. The poll found 65% found he made it worse. Blamed him for throwing gas on a fire. Therefore spilling hairs and semantics.You can blame whomever for whatever.
I am pointing out what the poll actually found.
I know. The poll found 65% found he made it worse. Blamed him for throwing gas on a fire. Therefore spilling hairs and semantics.You can blame whomever for whatever.
I am pointing out what the poll actually found.
Yes.A poll of less than 1700 people.
And the poll found lots of other people made it worse as well.I know. The poll found 65% found he made it worse. Blamed him for throwing gas on a fire. Therefore spilling hairs and semantics.
Ok then rather than focusing on a subjective poll, which can have many variables, let's just stick to what the court verdict was based on the laws of the land.A well known issue.
Which is why they have weighting.
Which is why worrying over margin of error is a waste of time when the weighting assumptions are a much more significant error issue.
I have no interest in saying that the legal decision doesn't matter just because people supported the decision when it happened.Ok then rather than focusing on a subjective poll, which can have many variables, let's just stick to what the court verdict was based on the laws of the land.
Otherwise, scrutinizing verdicts based on public opinion would be one step closer to anarchy.
Makes sense?
That's because JT Freeland(oxymoron) Medincino and the media reported it was a terrorist organization backed PutinI have no interest in saying that the legal decision doesn't matter just because people supported the decision when it happened.
Is this a position that only applies to liberals or are you willing to call out DoFo for his charter violations as well?Ok then rather than focusing on a subjective poll, which can have many variables, let's just stick to what the court verdict was based on the laws of the land.
Otherwise, scrutinizing verdicts based on public opinion would be one step closer to anarchy.
Makes sense?
Just one point that isn’t splitting hairs. Not other people. They did not ask the same questions of a different sample group.Yes.
A well-conducted poll with clearly reported methodology.
And the poll found lots of other people made it worse as well.
Why are you injecting DoFo into a thread about the court verdict against the Liberals violating the charter?Is this a position that only applies to liberals or are you willing to call out DoFo for his charter violations as well?
Just clarifying if this is another stupid partisan attack or if you actually care about holding all politicians to the same laws and rules.Why are you injecting DoFo into a thread about the court verdict against the Liberals violating the charter?
More distraction?
If you want to continue your obsession with DoFo start your own thread.
Jeezus it's chronic with you...get help.
Just clarifying if this is another partisan attack or if you actually care about holding all politicians to the same laws and rules.Why are you injecting DoFo into a thread about the court verdict against the Liberals violating the charter?
More distraction?
If you want to continue your obsession with DoFo start your own thread.
Jeezus it's chronic with you...get help.
Yes.Just one point that isn’t splitting hairs. Not other people. They did not ask the same questions of a different sample group.
The same people.
Indeed.And at the end of the day. A judge has rendered his decision.
all you do is interject and deflect with Trump, Ford, PeePee or Gaza. When have you ever said boo abouJust clarifying if this is another stupid partisan attack or if you actually care about holding all politicians to the same laws and rules.
Clearly its just partisan because you get very, very upset every time its brought up.
Not sure why you are trying to debate this, when it’s pretty straightforward.Yes.
And those people thought lots of things were making it worse.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau 65%
Ontario Premier Doug Ford 50%
Alberta Premier Jason Kenney 49%
Interim Opposition leader Candice Bergen 42%
Ottawa Police 45%
The Ontario Provincial Police 35%
For every single one of those groups, more people thought they were making it worse than making it better.
Indeed.
Which has nothing to do with this poll.
(This poll actually had more people in favor of using force to break up the protest than negotiation, as you know.)
a) 75-80% of Canadians wanted the anti vaxxer protests ended.all you do is interject and deflect with Trump, Ford, PeePee or Gaza. When have you ever said boo abou
Not sure why you are trying to debate this, when it’s pretty straightforward.
A) how many thought they overstayed
B) how many blamed Trudeau
C) what did a fucking federal judge decide. Do your opinion and prevarications, count for shit when a judge decides someone is guilty of abc?
Especially
Not having the legal cause to lower the boom, or some measures used. And it’s also obvious the judge agrees with the 65%
A federal judge agreed with the 65% that blamed Trudeau. And your opinion/deflections and prevarications now counts for shit.a) 75-80% of Canadians wanted the anti vaxxer protests ended.
b) 75% backed JT's use of the emergency act
c) that it might have been too extreme so it shouldn't be done again in the future
next?
Post the poll that says 65% 'blamed' Trudeau.A federal judge agreed with the 65% that blamed Trudeau.
Yes we should hold the Liberals accountable for violating the Canadian Charter of Rights.Just clarifying if this is another stupid partisan attack or if you actually care about holding all politicians to the same laws and rules.
Clearly its just partisan because you get very, very upset every time its brought up.
Are you saying that the court of public opinion is more powerful than the actual courts?
If yes, then...
View attachment 300339
It does answer a question: how much faith do you put into the court of public opinion?NGY was claiming 65% of Canadians 'blamed' Trudeau for using the emergency act on the anti vaxxers.
Posting a poll on popularity doesn't answer that claim.