Climate Scientist Defeats Deniers, Hopes to Empower Others to Speak Out on Global Crisis in Media
Climate Change
- Thread starter Addict2sex
- Start date
You have the utter confidence of the Dunning Kruger hero.
How stupid do you have to be to keep pushing this bait and switch chart?
All it shows is that you are unable to learn, unable to understand and unable to debate the issues.
This flood is massive, how do you get people out of there or rebuild?To The Climate Change Deniers.............If this is not due to the Impact from Climate Change, then what is!!
Brazil floods: 'We've never experienced anything like it'
People in southern Brazil have described the unprecedented devastation wreaked by flooding and overflowing rivers which have left swathes of the area under water.
The floods are the worst natural calamity ever to hit the state of Rio Grande do Sul, officials say.
At least 95 people have died and more than 130 are still missing.
An estimated 1.4 million people have been affected by the floods and aid workers are struggling to provide them with drinking water.
Days of torrential rain caused rivers to overflow and have submerged entire towns.
The capital of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, is among those affected.
The city of 1.3 million inhabitants has been almost totally cut off by the floods.
An estimated 80% of its population do not have access to running water after five of the city's six water treatment plants ceased working.
Suzan, a resident of Porto Alegre, said that people in the city had "never experienced anything like it".
"There are thousands of people who lost their houses. Now we don't have water anywhere," she said in a voice message she sent to the BBC.
"My mother-in-law is 90 years old and she had to be carried by the rescuers. It's unbelievable what is going on here," she added.
The city's mayor has rationed drinking water and city officials are distributing water in tanker trucks.
The work of aid and rescue teams has been hampered by criminal gangs, which have been stealing their boats.
"Jet skis and houses were looted. This is deplorable and must be denounced," a presidential spokesman said.
The city authorities have called for anyone who owns "any kind of boat" to put it at the disposal of emergency teams as thousands of residents still need to be rescued from neighbourhoods cut off by the water.
IMAGE SOURCE, GETTY
One resident, Alexander Ramos, told AFP news agency that he had been forced to leave his home because "everything had been washed away by the flood".
"We tried to wait as long as we could, but there was no chance, the army came and rescued us, as well as our dogs."
Some families are leaving the city on foot. "We've been without food for three days," one man told Reuters news agency.
"I'm with people I don't even know, I don't know where my family is," he added.
The latest estimates suggest 155,000 people have been left homeless.
The governor of the region has warned that torrential rainfall is due to resume this week.
Brazil floods: 'We've never experienced anything like it'
Residents of the Brazilian city of Porto Alegre describe the devastation caused by recent floods.www.bbc.co.uk
Remember that Brazil previously had the biggest far right Climate Change Denier in what he so called "accomplished":
Deforestation of Brazil’s Amazon Has Reached a Record High. What’s Being Done?
Deforestation of Brazil’s Amazon Has Reached a Record High. What’s Being Done?
Scientists say the rain forest is approaching a critical tipping point at which the damage is irreversible.www.cfr.org
too funny
all of the IPCC estimates come from failed computer models
failed computer models which
- can't replicate the past -a bare minimum for any predictive model
- do not agree with each other - settled science you say ? not even close
- do not agree with actual experimental data - the satellite data is verified by independent weather balloon data sets
it is the result of trying to force a proof of a predetermined conclusion & failing miserably
why would you call the results from "climate scientists'' models a "bait and switch'' ?
this is the output of the so called "settled science' vs the experimental observations in the troposphere
the troposphere, where the GHG theory predicts the catastrophic warming should take place, but has not taken place
this has been explained to you multiple times
there is no bait, there is no switch, just 73 plots of computer nonsense compared against real world experimental observations (satellite and weather balloon data )
the climate models are flawed
the real question is "How stupid do you have to be to keep trying to fake scientific understanding" ?
it is painfully obvious that you have no scientific training or scientific understanding
Hogwash. Look up the Younger Dryas period. 4°C rise in temperature in less than 50 years .The IPCC is a corrupt entity. We're living in the most stable climate in the past 2.5 million years. Enough of this nonsense already.
Wow, you still can't understand why your chart is bait and switch.
Start with reading the wiki definition of troposphere, where the satellite measures temperature.
Troposphere - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Next, compare that with global surface temperatures.
Global surface temperature - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Then see if you can puzzle out why using projections of measurements of the temperature on the surface of the planet shouldn't be compared with measurements of the temperature in the troposphere.
Then take a look at your last sentence and explain how someone who claims to know or have scientific training could make such a basic error repeatedly, and even after being told countless times.
Do you know what the major theory for that change in temperature is?
A shutdown of the AMOC.
AMOC shutdown is one of the 7 major tipping points we have been warmed are getting incredibly close.
Atlantic current shutdown is a real danger, suggests simulation
The most detailed computer model run so far shows that melting ice sheets could cause the collapse of the major ocean current that warms Europe, but it's still unclear how likely this is to happen
www.newscientist.com
True, but very sad indeed. Brazil is going through a very rough time. Several other countries are experiencing their worst effects of this Climate Change.
The right wingers are going from the frying pan into the fire with regards to their very partisan Climate Change views. They just cannot go by the Science!!
very partisan Climate Change views????
do you think Brazil has never had weather trouble before in its billion year history ?
you would not know science from propaganda if it ran you over
this is your settled pseudo science and it is a god damn mess
it is astounding how stupid you areWow, you still can't understand why your chart is bait and switch.
Start with reading the wiki definition of troposphere, where the satellite measures temperature.
Troposphere - Wikipedia
Next, compare that with global surface temperatures.
Global surface temperature - Wikipedia
Then see if you can puzzle out why using projections of measurements of the temperature on the surface of the planet shouldn't be compared with measurements of the temperature in the troposphere.
what part of
confuses you ?
told countless times by a scientific know nothing with zero scientific training and a pathological desire to lie?
your proposal have been evaluated and rejected due to your history as a high school drop out and inability to be honest
the troposphere, where the GHG theory predicts the catastrophic warming should take place, but has not taken place
there is a reason why Atmospheric scientists choose to look at the Atmosphere rather than look at the ground
there is a reason why Atmospheric scientists have been sending weather balloons up into the Atmosphere for 150 years +
the surface temperature record data is
- filled with errors,
- contaminated by urban sprawl
- incomplete (2/3 of the planet is ocean)
- and has been diddled with
it is astounding how stupid / dishonest you are
Last edited:
You are comparing predictions of surface temperatures with actual atmosphere temperatures, how does that make any sense?
Larue, are you being intentionally dishonest or are you that stupid?
The IPCC projections are for surface temperatures and you want to measure them by the temperatures in the clouds.
Its like in your HVAC job before you retired 40 years ago the clients came to you and said, 'mr johnny, our furnace won't turn off its 45ºC in here' and then you went and said 'don't be silly, I just measured the temperature outside and its 18ºC there, everything is fine'.
As you said:
You are comparing apples to oranges.
You are comparing the temperature in the clouds to projections for the temperature on the ground.
what is wrong with you?
they are not predictions of surface temperatures, they are predictions of temperature anomalies
look at the scale moron
was the average surface temperature 0.1 C in 1980?
was the average troposphere temperature 0.1 C in 1980?
you do not have a clue what you blither about
explain how an atmospheric gas CO2 can heat up the surface without heating up the atmosphere ?
do not forget to include an explanation of how your moron theory obeys the laws of thermodynamics, the Stephan- law and energy conservation
Last edited:
They are temperature anomalies of surface temperature, larue.
comparing temperature anomalies (change in temperature predicted by the models ) with temperature anomalies (change in temperature- observed by satellite / weather balloon data )
it is called a relative comparison
look at the scale, moron
Last edited:
comparing temperature anomalies (change in temperature) relative to a different reference
1979 = 0 as per Christy
1979 = looks to be -0.4 as per your fraudster Mann
you do not understand what you post
what a moron
