Climate Change
- Thread starter Addict2sex
- Start date
There was no diddling of numbers.
Your 'opposing scientists' couldn't write a paper that would pass peer assessment, their work is shoddy but good enough to fool you.
The world has warmed 1.5ºC, as the IPCC has warned us.
We are on track for 3ºC or more.
There is no denying that the IPCC scientists, including Mann, Hansen and others, are right.
You can't even raise a single point that disputes any of this.
You want some of this?Whatever is happening to our climate I would like more of the same please.
A Quebec lender opted out of mortgages in flood zones. Experts warn it could happen elsewhere
Desjardins no longer offering mortgages in high-risk flood areas, worrying homeowners
Then keep your Hummer idling in traffic thanks to the unused bike lanes and if Al Gore and Greta Toonberg are right we will have these days all year round.
Climate change didn't create flood zones. Nature did. It's why they call it the mighty Mississippi You ever read the story about Noah's Arc. I'll give you a briefing on it. It involves a flood.
You never hear people living in warm weather climates wanting to vacation to a Nordic country.Whatever is happening to our climate I would like more of the same please.
People have built in flood zones for decades, the difference was they could pay high insurance premiums and not lose everything.
Now their houses are almost worthless because there are more floods from climate change.
Is that why they call it the Mississippi?
And Noah's ark?
You bring some serious science to the debate.
I don't know why all the science deniers aren't making use of this chance to buy flood zone and coastal property while its cheap.
Since you know so much more than the insurance industry and all of science this is the perfect time to buy while its cheap.
There's a lot of things that money has been taking care of for years. Time has come to pay up...
Same with those who lose their homes to forest fires?
How about farmers?
Do you know guns have been available forever ( well almost) , and if people don’t want to become a statistic best not to play with loaded ones? Aka no-one is forcing no-one to buy in flood zones. And yet politicians, city planers, continue to allow it.
Do you know when hurricanes blow in and flood towns on coastlines, they are still building and buying there.
And do you know when you raze fields for parking lots, not only are you removing shade and living things, and natures filters. You change both soil erosion and how water takes the path of least resistance and shit rolls down hills.
River floods in Greece
Ελλάδα σε ένα μεταβαλλόμενο κλίμα. Όλα για την κλιματική αλλαγή, τα τρωτά σημεία και στρατηγικές προσαρμογής για όλες τις ευρωπαϊκές χώρες.
www.climatechangepost.com
And do you know, that most or a lot of todays mega insurance claims are due to deforestation
River floods in Greece
Ελλάδα σε ένα μεταβαλλόμενο κλίμα. Όλα για την κλιματική αλλαγή, τα τρωτά σημεία και στρατηγικές προσαρμογής για όλες τις ευρωπαϊκές χώρες.
www.climatechangepost.com
And do you know as more and more and more people file insurance claims, premiums go up and up and up. Insurance Cos, underwriters and risk evaluators aren’t in the business of losing green stuff. Such a simple thing to solve, but no-one is.
Once again. It is inevitable. Do you understand that much? Let’s start there.
forest fires.
do you know fires are chemical reactions and need three things? Ever tried to burn a live tree vs dead tinder?
floods.
do you know water takes the path of least resistance.
have you heard the song paving paradise for parking lots. Maybe you should get a finger nail dirty, volunteer to plant trees or try to save what’s critically important and all around you, the Credit, the Humber, the Rouge, Duffins, Lynde, Harmony, Wilmot Ganaraska. I won’t include the Don, you’ve already made that a cesspool and it’s way too late….And what’s just north of you and under the ground. Almost all you can get to on the TTC or walk to. If your shit and piss polluting them don’t bother you. Maybe less snowfall should.
Do you know and this is very broadly, very loosely speaking that nature has this magical way of balancing itself. So while the prairies might get less precipitation….might somewhere else get more? If so where?
it amazes me now all of a sudden your concerned about farmers. You don’t seem two give two shits about them any other time. Whether that’s rural/small town Ontario and ubi gangs. Or western Canada wanting to separate
Either way, long before its fire and brimstone. My money will be on us doing it to ourselves first.
Last edited:
frank's only contribution to TERB is creating animosity and discord. He is universally despised because of his proclivity to call everybody else a liar while he has no compunction to lie through his teeth, his refusal to answer the simplest of questions and his poor debating ethics. He contributes nothing of value. I don't know why he's here.
Were they measuring sea levels back then? When did they start doing so? Do you have the results over that time?
Just asking some legitimate questions.
Wow, what a truly wacked post.Do you know guns have been available forever ( well almost) , and if people don’t want to become a statistic best not to play with loaded ones? Aka no-one is forcing no-one to buy in flood zones. And yet politicians, city planers, continue to allow it.
Do you know when hurricanes blow in and flood towns on coastlines, they are still building and buying there.
And do you know when you raze fields for parking lots, not only are you removing shade and living things, and natures filters. You change both soil erosion and how water takes the path of least resistance and shit rolls down hills.
.River floods in Greece
Ελλάδα σε ένα μεταβαλλόμενο κλίμα. Όλα για την κλιματική αλλαγή, τα τρωτά σημεία και στρατηγικές προσαρμογής για όλες τις ευρωπαϊκές χώρες.www.climatechangepost.com
And do you know, that most or a lot of todays mega insurance claims are due to deforestation
.River floods in Greece
Ελλάδα σε ένα μεταβαλλόμενο κλίμα. Όλα για την κλιματική αλλαγή, τα τρωτά σημεία και στρατηγικές προσαρμογής για όλες τις ευρωπαϊκές χώρες.www.climatechangepost.com
And do you know as more and more and more people file insurance claims, premiums go up and up and up. Insurance Cos, underwriters and risk evaluators aren’t in the business of losing green stuff. Such a simple thing to solve, but no-one is.
How incredibly irrelevant, incoherent and ignorant.
You really have no idea what the climate change debate is about, do you?
Were they measuring sea levels before the internal combustion engine ?
sure...... that is a legitimate question
Given how important sea travel has been through history, man has likely been studying sea levels shortly after creating mathematics
multiple ice ages would naturally affect sea levels & we are still naturally emerging from an ice age
any significant sea level rise would require massive amounts of ice melt
Bottom line
90% of the planets ice (70% of the fresh water) is entombed in the Antarctic
Antarctic Ice Sheet extends almost 14 million square kilometers (5.4 million square miles), roughly the area of the contiguous United States and Mexico combined. It also contains about 30 million cubic kilometers (7.2 million cubic miles) of ice.
The ice sheet averages 2,160 meters thick, making Antarctica the highest continent.
The average temperature in the interior throughout the year is about -57°C, with the minimum temperature being -90°C during the winter season.
The whole continent is frozen 99.9% of the time
This ice block is not going to melt anytime soon
if temperatures rise by 60 C , it will melt, however every living thing on the planet would have been roasted,
Co2 is measured in parts per million
one will be able to adjust to the naturally occurring sea level rise that might occur in a lifetime by taking a half step back from the surf
Last edited:
Its not a legitimate question, it shows you have basic understandings of paleoclimatology.
We have learned how to use multiple methods to detect historic sea levels.
Antarctic glacial melt in the transition between glacier and sea is the issue.
Do you understand how much ice is not on the surface of the antarctic but is a floating glacier attached?
sure its a legitimate question
however it was not me who asked it
i answered the question correctly
try to keep up
Ha Ha
and once again you demonstrative how you do not have the first clue about science
floating ice has no effect on volume when it melts
besides
1. Antarctica is a vast ice-covered landmass surrounded by sea (unlike the Arctic, which is an ice-covered ocean surrounded by land).
98% is on land
2. The distribution of precipitation over Antarctica is very marked, with several metres of snow falling each year near the coast but the interior only getting an annual snowfall of a few centimetres,
3. do you not understand what -57C means when you babble about Antarctic glacial melt ?
when's your next clown show ?
Last edited:
FF gets his "science facts" from memes and X posts. He's just here for entertainment purposes.
